15:03:11 <tmorin> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:03:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar  1 15:03:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:03:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:03:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:03:27 <tmorin> hi doude, enikher, matrohon, pcarver, timirnich
15:03:31 <pcarver> hi
15:03:37 <tmorin> bgpvpn meeting starting now :)
15:03:47 <enikher> BGPVPN YEAH!!!
15:05:05 <tmorin> enikher: :)
15:05:08 <enikher> so is there a new bank holiday in france after the heat contribution?
15:05:44 <tmorin> not sure I follow you ... :)
15:05:52 <tmorin> I'm bad at getting jokes
15:06:41 <enikher> 24 Feb. HEAT contribution day - Everyboby get free beer
15:07:15 <tmorin> getting free beer sounds more German than French, doesn't it ?  ;)
15:07:31 <tmorin> matrohon does not seem around
15:07:43 <enikher> Mhhh I am not good in wines
15:08:03 <tmorin> ok let's start
15:08:09 <tmorin> #topic announce
15:08:33 <tmorin> #info Heat contribution from enikher was merged last week
15:08:47 <tmorin> Heat support for router associations is in progress (matrohon)
15:09:03 <tmorin> thanks a lot for this Heat support enikher !!
15:09:19 <enikher> your are welcome
15:09:19 <tmorin> do we have other announces ?
15:10:05 <tmorin> ok...
15:10:07 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:10:22 <tmorin> #topic static routes
15:10:49 <tmorin> static routes is somethings that would be nice to progress
15:11:49 <enikher> yes, is the blueprint already acknowledged?
15:11:59 <tmorin> timirnich, enikher: I'll try to restart the discuss with jan this week or next week, feel free to pass him the word that trying to move forward with that would be nice
15:12:19 <tmorin> enikher: not yet, Jan and me have been trying to sort out what a good API would look like
15:12:33 <enikher> mhhh ok
15:13:12 <enikher> is the etherpad up to date?
15:13:24 <enikher> of your lates discussions?
15:15:09 <tmorin> nope
15:15:13 <tmorin> it's not
15:16:18 <tmorin> hopefully, me and Jan may find some time to work on this...
15:16:21 <enikher> ok, would be nice if we could manage to have this. it is difficult for me to help here otherwise
15:17:18 <tmorin> yes, but we haven't frozen our understanding enough to write things down in the pad
15:18:03 <tmorin> perhaps having a chat with Jan will help you
15:18:06 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:18:30 <tmorin> #topic bagpipe driver
15:18:46 <tmorin> the Neutron change to allow extensions to access the OVS bridge objects has been merged yesterday
15:18:57 <enikher> tmorin: ok
15:19:08 <tmorin> the patch to apply that to do a clean bagpipe extension is in progress
15:19:33 <tmorin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281358/
15:19:40 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:19:47 <tmorin> #topic move to neutron-lib
15:19:57 <tmorin> this is a topic I haven't investigated yet
15:20:11 <tmorin> I suspect we may have many (simple) things to update in networking-bgpvpn
15:20:20 <tmorin> to follow the things that move from neutron to neutron-lib
15:20:28 <tmorin> any help around that will be welcome
15:20:45 <enikher> can you give more info here?
15:21:06 <enikher> is the python code just named differently?
15:21:36 <tmorin> let me find an example
15:21:52 <tmorin> "a good picture is worth 1024 words"
15:22:57 <tmorin> here is what had to be done for neutron-lbaas:
15:22:58 <tmorin> https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas/commit/2a74aa29d4480972d31a4b39c13790f4bd3aaf25
15:23:17 <tmorin> exception and constant definition moving out of neutron module, into neutron-lib module
15:23:53 <tmorin> we'll have to keep an eye on that and see what impacts our code
15:23:53 <enikher> whould have benn nice if they called it networking_lib
15:23:56 <tmorin> maybe nothing yet
15:24:26 <enikher> do you know in which release the modules are removed from neutron?
15:25:09 <tmorin> mitaka
15:25:25 <tmorin> some things are incrementally moved from neutron to neutron-lib
15:25:32 <tmorin> during the mitaka cycle
15:25:36 <enikher> oh realy... that would mean we need to have it before the release?
15:25:42 <tmorin> maybe that will continue afterwards
15:26:01 <tmorin> whatever moves during mitaka cycle we'll have to follow for our mitaka release, es
15:26:02 <tmorin> yes
15:26:35 <tmorin> it's essentially a matter of doing a python test and a DVSM check regularly and confirming things still work
15:26:48 <tmorin> and fixing whatever needs to if things fail
15:27:22 <enikher> mmhhh
15:27:29 <enikher> I think that is enough
15:27:34 <tmorin> this job is here to do these tests
15:27:38 <tmorin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232451/
15:28:07 <tmorin> assuming our unit test trigger an import of all modules, yes, that should be enough
15:30:11 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:30:22 <tmorin> I don't have one in mind
15:30:33 <tmorin> #topic open discussion
15:30:42 <tmorin> enikher ?
15:31:08 <enikher> yes
15:31:10 <enikher> I have one
15:31:57 <enikher> #info SDN VPN for C Release
15:32:21 <tmorin> #topic OPNFV: SDNVPN for C release
15:32:31 <tmorin> go ahead
15:32:44 <enikher> but it does not realy make sense since only so few people are her
15:32:46 <enikher> here
15:33:02 <enikher> I would like to invite everyone to the C Release planning:
15:33:05 <tmorin> enikher: yeah, it seems like if it's really between the two of us
15:33:06 <enikher> #info https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/SDN_VPN_roadmap
15:34:28 <enikher> my be it is a good idea to include static routes in the OPNFV C release
15:34:31 <tmorin> ok, I'll try to spend some time on that this week
15:34:32 <enikher> what do you think?
15:35:09 <enikher> Our main objective is testing at the moment, so that should serve BGPVPN as well
15:35:10 <tmorin> enikher: well, yeah, but it only makes sense if we can do this in time for mitaka, right ?
15:35:41 <enikher> yes I think so. I am not sure about the release dates of OPNFV
15:35:54 <tmorin> enikher: maybe putting it in the SDNVPN roadmap can help having people spend time on it ?
15:36:11 <enikher> yes that could happen
15:36:22 <tmorin> enikher: I guess C must be around september (??)
15:36:41 <enikher> yes something like that...
15:37:12 <enikher> that just it :-) we can continue
15:37:47 <tmorin> ok
15:37:59 <tmorin> then it means we are done AFAICT
15:38:00 <tmorin> :)
15:38:52 <enikher> ok :-)
15:39:46 <tmorin> thank you folks
15:39:48 <tmorin> !
15:39:55 <tmorin> or let's say folk_
15:39:56 <tmorin> :)
15:40:00 <enikher> :-)
15:40:05 <tmorin> #endmeeting