15:03:12 <tmorin> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:03:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 17 15:03:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:03:13 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:03:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:03:32 <tmorin> hi doude, enikher, matrohon, timirnich
15:03:36 <matrohon> hi
15:03:52 <enikher> #info Nikolas Hermanns
15:03:54 <pcarver> hi
15:03:58 <doude> hi
15:04:01 <enikher> hey
15:05:22 <tmorin> enikher: I've proposed Jan and Georg to join as well... do you know if they may come ?
15:05:42 <enikher> I will contact them internally
15:05:52 <tmorin> enikher: k, thanks
15:07:31 <enikher> georg will come, jan does not have time.
15:07:55 <tmorin> ok
15:08:00 <tmorin> let's start
15:08:58 <tmorin> for the agenda, I think we can discuss: Neutron stadium expected implications on bgpvpn (let's be shorter than last week), mitaka release, doc update, ongoing work on API new features
15:09:03 <tmorin> anything else you see ?
15:09:32 <matrohon> fine gor me
15:10:17 <tmorin> #topic Neutron stadium expected implications on bgpvpn
15:10:30 <tmorin> this is about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312199/
15:10:53 <tmorin> a clarification has been brought up: the API we have now for BGPVPN would be accepted as a starting point
15:11:03 <tmorin> no need to restart from scratch
15:11:53 <tmorin> further evolution will happen via neutron-api/neutron-lib/neutron-specs (details not settled yet), but in a way which would have net-bgpvpn core have +2 rights
15:12:04 <tmorin> +w rights would remain at the end of Neutron's cores
15:12:48 <tmorin> comments ?
15:13:24 <tmorin> as far as I can tell, I think staying in the stadium will work out fine
15:14:27 <tmorin> matrohon, enikher, doude: any comment ?
15:14:34 <enikher> I am reading :-)
15:14:46 <matrohon> nope, I'm fine with that
15:14:53 <doude> ok
15:15:39 <enikher> I am as well
15:16:03 <pcarver> I'm in favor of APIs in general and BGPVPN APIs in particular being "part of Neutron" whereas backend implementations don't need to be. I think the dicussion is headed in an acceptable direction.
15:16:27 <pcarver> networking APIs, I mean. Obviously not all APIs.
15:16:31 <tmorin> pcarver: +1
15:17:04 <tmorin> ok
15:17:09 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:17:47 <tmorin> #topic mitaka release
15:17:53 <tmorin> our mitaka release is pending
15:18:01 <tmorin> the request to release has been waiting for some time now
15:18:11 * tmorin trying to find a link
15:18:27 <tmorin> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1576384
15:18:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1576384 in neutron "Request Mitaka release for networking-bgpvpn" [Undecided,Confirmed] - Assigned to Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka)
15:19:03 <tmorin> ihrachys is assigned to it, but must have been busy post-Austin
15:19:33 <ihrachys> hm, I thought it's merged?.. lemme check
15:19:46 <ihrachys> oh it's 4.0.0
15:19:50 <tmorin> ihrachys: 3.0.1 was released
15:19:51 <ihrachys> I mixed things I guess.
15:19:54 <tmorin> ihrachys: yes
15:19:59 <ihrachys> lemme handle that now
15:20:15 <tmorin> ok, cool! :)
15:20:44 <tmorin> having a stable/mitaka branch will be handy
15:21:31 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:22:34 <tmorin> #topic Documentation
15:22:51 <tmorin> I've pushed minor doc updates today
15:23:09 <tmorin> base Nuage networks driver info
15:23:15 <tmorin> and base install/config information
15:23:33 <tmorin> pcarver: any update on what you mentioned last week ?
15:24:23 <pcarver> tmorin: Do you mean API docs? I'm still reading about Swagger and looking at examples.
15:24:37 <tmorin> pcarver: yes, that's what I meant
15:24:39 <tmorin> pcarver: ok
15:24:52 <pcarver> I think I've got the general idea but haven't started on BGPVPN APIs yet.
15:25:17 <pcarver> I need to figure out the toolchain first.
15:25:31 <pcarver> There seem to be a few different options.
15:26:18 <tmorin> ok
15:26:19 <pcarver> I haven't found a definitive step-by-step one way to do it guide, but there is a lot of info available so I should be fine
15:26:50 <pcarver> It's basically a YAML based syntax with tools to generate the dynamic web pages
15:26:52 <tmorin> don't hesitate to ping #openstack-net-bgpvpn if you think that a discussion between available options can be useful
15:28:00 <tmorin> pcarver: thanks for the update
15:28:03 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:28:43 <tmorin> #topic "advanced" routing-related new API features
15:29:16 <tmorin> we had dicussed static routes, aggregation, Port associations in Austin
15:29:49 <tmorin> Georg Kunz pinged me and Jan to proceed where our discussions had stopped
15:30:02 <tmorin> georgk1: is it you ^^ ?
15:30:09 <georgk1> yes, it is me
15:30:13 <tmorin> :)
15:30:28 <georgk1> I was basically just courious to find out about your plans on port association
15:30:33 <tmorin> the result of the restarted discussion is a summary of the things we want to address in this pad
15:30:36 <tmorin> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bgpvpn_advanced_features
15:31:12 <tmorin> the next step is to move from these use case to a list of primitives to add to the API to address the use cases
15:32:21 <tmorin> doude, enikher: don't hesitate to have a look, you may already have an idea of how these use cases may map to the controllers you know better
15:33:31 <enikher> I will discuss this with Jan and come back to you Thomas
15:33:38 <tmorin> ok !
15:33:56 <tmorin> i'll update the static routes and port association blueprints with a link to this pad
15:33:59 <georgk1> tmorin: we will have a meeting the OPNFV NetReady project at 6PM to discuss L3VPN use cases
15:34:12 <tmorin> ah, good
15:34:21 <tmorin> except I won't be able to attend
15:34:32 <georgk1> ok, that a shame
15:34:39 <tmorin> do you have a  link on where the discuss would be archived
15:34:53 <tmorin> hopefully its not gomeeting only ?
15:35:03 <georgk1> well.... mostly, i am afraid
15:35:16 <georgk1> i´ll try to take some notes
15:35:41 <georgk1> and eventually we are working on a document
15:35:56 <georgk1> so that could be something I´ll send to you later
15:36:07 <tmorin> I'll appreciate any doc/link you have, to read tomoroow
15:36:09 <tmorin> yes :)
15:36:13 <georgk1> anyway, I would be nice to get your input at some point
15:36:29 <georgk1> ok, great
15:37:38 <tmorin> yes, it's good if everyone around net-bgpvpn can comment
15:37:40 <tmorin> thanks
15:37:44 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:38:00 <tmorin> #topic open discuss
15:38:49 <tmorin> one thing I wanted to announce: we have work in progress on an Horizon plugin for the BGPVPN API, hopefully ready in a few weeks
15:40:13 <ihrachys> tmorin: https://review.openstack.org/317582 the release request
15:40:21 <ihrachys> tmorin: tag and branch are already in your repo
15:41:05 <tmorin> ihrachys: thanks a lot!
15:42:45 <tmorin> do we have anything else to discuss ?
15:42:55 <tmorin> doude, enikher, matrohon, pcarver ?
15:43:08 <matrohon> not for me
15:43:15 <doude> nop
15:43:29 <enikher> Horizon +1 that is cool!
15:44:19 <enikher> I don't have anything else
15:44:30 <pcarver> nothing for me
15:44:44 <tmorin> ok, we're done then!
15:44:54 <tmorin> thanks everyone...
15:44:59 <tmorin> #endmeeting