15:09:53 <matrohon> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:09:54 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun  7 15:09:53 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is matrohon. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:09:55 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:09:57 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:10:28 <matrohon> hi all
15:10:46 <mickeys> Hi
15:10:50 <matrohon> tmorin is offline today
15:10:58 <matrohon> Hi mickeys
15:11:16 <matrohon> hi pcarver doude
15:12:51 <matrohon> we don't have much to announce today, and i'm not there has been a lot of progress on bug resolution and code
15:13:20 <matrohon> so this meeting is going to be very short if nobody has a specific topic
15:14:28 <mickeys> I just wanted to encourage people to review
15:14:31 <mickeys> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/322654/
15:14:54 <matrohon> mickeys, yep, thanks for this initiative
15:14:59 <mickeys> We will need to submit a separate RFE for the addition of the VNI to bgpvpn
15:16:11 <matrohon> mickeys, please do, but it shouldn't be a big deal as it was planed to work on it
15:16:40 <mickeys> Yes, we think it is pretty straightforward. Just need to jump through the process and submit the code for review
15:17:22 <matrohon> mickeys, because of the stadium decomposition the process might change quickly
15:17:40 <mickeys> Has neutron-api evolved to the point where it affects this?
15:17:49 <matrohon> but let us work as usual for this item
15:18:16 <matrohon> mickeys, yep, since it's a API change, we might fill a bug on neutron-api
15:20:13 <matrohon> mickeys, bug please just report a RFE bug on networking-bgpvpn for this topic
15:21:35 <mickeys> I thought we have to aim it at neutron so that neutron drivers can approve it?
15:22:23 <matrohon> We can try, but the stadium decomposition bp is still under review
15:22:31 <matrohon> mickeys, ^
15:22:49 <matrohon> mickeys, and there were still pending discussion explicitly about that
15:23:21 <mickeys> We are happy to go either way, just wondering what the right thing to do is
15:24:39 <matrohon> mickeys we still have untill ocata-1 to adopt the new process, so I wouldn't go with such a complicated use case to experiment the new process
15:24:59 <mickeys> OK, then we will aim it at networking-bgpvpn
15:25:22 <matrohon> mickeys, but if you prefer testing the new process I'm fine with it too :) as you want
15:25:48 <mickeys> Simpler to go with networking-bgpvpn :-)
15:26:06 <matrohon> mickeys, agree :)
15:28:15 <matrohon> leaving 1 more minute to talk about any other topic before closing this meeting
15:30:49 <matrohon> bye everybody
15:30:53 <matrohon> #endmeeting