15:14:36 #startmeeting bgpvpn 15:14:37 Meeting started Tue Sep 13 15:14:36 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:14:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:14:41 The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn' 15:15:14 hi bfernando, doude, eon`, pcarver, timirnich 15:16:28 hmm... sounds like I'm alone :-( 15:16:34 sorry 15:16:59 I was focused somewhere ^^ 15:17:02 hi bfernando :) 15:17:03 np 15:17:11 the meeting is going to be quick 15:17:17 hi ok 15:17:19 #topic announce / last week 15:17:37 last week we merged a few tempest improvements 15:17:53 the work to backport the tempest test has started 15:18:08 the stable/mitaka gate config is now ready 15:18:19 and we can thus backport tempest test to this branch 15:18:48 cool :) 15:19:29 I'm unsure if the best is to cherry-pick all the tempest changes each in its own backport change, or if we should squash'em all in one change 15:21:11 Since eon` has taken this task I don't know what is his mind 15:21:32 I'm asking now to ihar on #openstack-neutron 15:22:47 let's go back to this topic if ihar replies 15:22:53 #topic bugs 15:23:15 matrohon is working on a fix to bug #1537067 15:23:17 bug 1537067 in networking-bgpvpn "enforce constraints on "neutron router-interface-add"" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537067 - Assigned to Mathieu Rohon (mathieu-rohon) 15:23:49 doude: matrohon was wondering if you could suggest an improvement to the opencontrail driver ... any idea ? 15:25:09 tmorin: hi 15:25:23 hi doude 15:25:29 what type of improvment you talk about? 15:26:37 doude : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369413/2/networking_bgpvpn/neutron/services/service_drivers/opencontrail/opencontrail.py 15:26:58 s/improvement/make the new check work/ 15:27:48 the new non-driver specific check needs one thing from the driver: know the BGPVPNs existing for a network 15:28:47 so we need the opencontrail driver to "cooperate" :) 15:29:17 the actual bgpvpn opencontrail driver is a PoC and use a basic key/value store to maintain bgpvpn resources 15:29:38 that store does not permit to do complexe search 15:30:15 we need to reconsider all that driver and implement bgpvpn resources in contrail schema 15:30:23 s/schema/data model 15:30:45 you mean you can't find the BGPVPNs for a given network from the KV store ? 15:31:02 but the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369413/2/networking_bgpvpn/neutron/services/service_drivers/opencontrail/opencontrail.py can be done 15:31:27 the driver can retrieve all kv store and then filter to find the correct bgpvpn 15:31:38 hmm, yeah 15:31:45 not enthousiasting :) 15:31:57 it's not efficient but that's already the case when we list bgpvpn of a tenant 15:32:15 (and probably other use case I don't remember) 15:32:18 any idea when contrail schema could support BGPVPN entries ? 15:32:24 no 15:32:29 and also to list associations of a bvpvpn 15:32:45 ^^ 15:33:00 hi lewo 15:33:04 yeah... 15:33:06 hi tmorin 15:33:29 ok... 15:33:47 back to previous topic: bfernando, eon`: ihar answer is that we should cherry-pick the changes to backport one by one, each in its own change 15:34:00 eon`: this can now be started anytime 15:34:13 tmorin, ok got it ;) 15:34:27 eon`: I think the changes will need to be stacked on each other in the right order 15:39:34 anything else to cover today ? 15:39:43 not much it seems... 15:39:52 tmorin: got it 15:40:02 eon`: ok ! 16:00:50 strigazi: ready? 16:00:52 tmorin: don't forget to end the meeting :) 16:01:06 #endmeeting