15:07:42 #startmeeting bgpvpn 15:07:45 Meeting started Tue Oct 11 15:07:42 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tmorin1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:07:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:07:48 The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn' 15:08:13 hi everyone 15:08:47 hi bfernando, doude, lewo, matrohon, pcarver, timirnich ... 15:09:02 hi 15:09:33 hi 15:11:09 hi 15:13:27 we'll wait a bit for matrohon 15:13:47 but I can start with what he already knows 15:13:55 #topic announcements 15:15:13 I've triggered yesterday a last mitaka release 4.0.2, including a pile of fixes among which the one merged end of last week (doude) 15:15:35 and after merges the last pending things for our newton.0 release, we've just asked for a release 15:15:42 thanks for the backport tmorin1 15:15:50 you're welcome :) 15:16:18 I expect our 5.0.0 to be out very soon (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383624/) 15:17:52 hieulq_, sorry 15:17:56 hieulq_, sorry 15:18:06 we have one small horizon bug, but which can be fixed in a 5.0.1 (bug 1632264) 15:18:06 bug 1632264 in networking-bgpvpn "horizon admin GUI: failure if there is one BGPVPN with non-existant tenant" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1632264 15:18:06 hi sorry 15:18:09 :) 15:18:11 :) 15:18:28 I just explained the release work done/in progress 15:19:41 next topic ? 15:19:44 odl driver ? 15:19:50 #topic ODL driver 15:20:10 we've hit an issue yestreday, where our gate was broken because of a broken DB migration script in ODL 15:20:43 because we have odl as a test-requirement and we have a db migration test that runs every db hook installed in the venv 15:20:54 all this was quite easily worked around 15:21:14 yamahata, is on the patch too 15:21:21 but lead us to think that its probably time for ODL driver to move in networking-odl 15:21:35 it is targeted for ocata : 15:21:39 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1632117 15:21:39 Launchpad bug 1632117 in networking-bgpvpn "odl driver for bgpvpn should be moved to networking-odl and v2 type driver is needed" [Undecided,Confirmed] 15:22:57 see bug 1632117 15:22:57 bug 1632117 in networking-bgpvpn "odl driver for bgpvpn should be moved to networking-odl and v2 type driver is needed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1632117 15:22:57 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1632117 15:23:12 openstack bot doing funky things :) 15:23:58 we currently also have bagpipe bgpvpn driver sitting partly in networking-bgpvpn and partly in networking-bagpipe, we'll consider changing that in ocata as well 15:24:15 but we'll have other things to do for ocata... 15:24:27 ... next topic : stadium ? 15:24:42 #topic networking-bgppvn in stadium 15:24:46 well, this way we would avoid assessment for bagpipe... 15:25:36 matrohon: perhaps, but perhaps not, it would still be a dependency ... 15:26:00 anyhow, the goal for bagpipe is to meet the stadium criteria as well 15:26:10 I mean avoid assesment for net-bagpipe 15:26:19 maybe others wonder what assessment we are talking about 15:26:29 maybe :) 15:26:33 matrohon: yes, but I'm not sure we can/want avoid it :) 15:26:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/383906 15:26:58 it's basically a checklist of things we should do 15:27:06 we do a fair number of them, but not all 15:27:24 here is an HTML version 15:27:28 #link http://docs-draft.openstack.org/06/383906/2/check/gate-neutron-specs-docs-ubuntu-xenial/5191893//doc/build/html/specs/stadium/ocata/networking-bgpvpn.html 15:28:15 we pretty good on N.* 15:28:28 we are also pretty good for D.* 15:28:59 tmorin1: we are partially meeting C.* criteria 15:30:05 the parts missing are: C4 (fulstack), do better on C3 (functional), C6 (grenade), C7 (multinode: does it apply for us?), C8 (python3) 15:30:45 and C1 is missing as well (grafana) 15:31:17 R1 and R2 are ok 15:31:38 S1 ok as well 15:32:04 I think we can emulate multinode with fullstack... 15:32:11 possibly 15:32:27 AFAIR, neutron does that 15:33:37 neutron has also grenade... multinode tests 15:33:51 last criteria is " L1. If the project requires a client library, how does it implement CLI and API bindings? " 15:33:55 neutron has a lot of dev... 15:34:12 I think our answer won't be in our favor until we support openstack client 15:34:58 armax: we're discussing about networking-bgpvpn scorecard 15:36:29 armax: how are we expected to update it ? first merge the empty score card then we push changes with real content ? or we push PS2..PS3... to the current change (https://review.openstack.org/383906) ? 15:36:58 tmorin1: I’ll have a first pass, then you can review/comment and go from tehre 15:37:39 armax: ok, is it helpful if we comment on certain items 15:37:47 armax summed it up in : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383907/ 15:38:10 armax, ok 15:38:49 matrohon: ok, thanks for the pointer 15:38:52 armax: thanks 15:42:11 so quite obviously, the better we fare on this scorecard at ocata-1 deadline, the better 15:42:47 we'll need willing contributors to help improve on the criteria that we don't meet yet 15:44:07 in particular (no order): openstack client (L1), grafana (C1), fullstack (C4), python3, grenade (C6), multinode (C7) 15:45:50 I have a colleague with whom we've already started looking at adding fullstack testing for networking-bgpvpn and networking-bagpipe 15:46:12 cool! 15:47:11 pcarver, doude, lewo/bfernando, timirnich: don't be shy, don't hesitate to take on one of these items ! 15:47:25 :) 15:48:24 doude: I'm sure doing the openstack client stuff, or adjusting code for python 3, are the kind of things that would take you only 2-3 hours :) 15:48:42 sorry, I don't follow all the OpenStack neutron activities. What is fullstack? Or perhaps is no the place to discuss it, but do you have doc link? 15:49:00 http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/fullstack_testing.html 15:49:10 certainly 15:49:13 not 15:49:18 thanks tmorin1 15:49:51 in Barcelona, i'll buy drinks to whoever has started work on any of these ! ;) 15:50:11 I take the openstaclient one 15:50:17 Ill buy nachos and tacos! 15:50:18 do you have a bug , 15:50:20 ? 15:50:22 goood :) 15:50:25 let me check 15:50:28 tmorin1: I don't expect to have any time before the summit, but will hopefully be able to help with some of this after 15:50:31 I think that we do 15:50:53 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1561993 15:50:53 Launchpad bug 1561993 in networking-bgpvpn "support for openstack CLI" [High,Confirmed] 15:51:03 pcarver: ok... ocata-1 is November 17th, so we won't have /that/ much time after Barcelona 15:51:58 doude ^ for the openstack client bug 15:52:05 ok 15:52:07 thanks matrohon 15:52:30 #topic barcelona 15:52:34 about Barcelona 15:52:58 we didn't check yet where to "ask" for a design summit slot 15:53:05 or did anyone ? 15:53:08 matrohon: ? 15:53:30 not really 15:53:41 I thinks we will do as previous summit 15:54:33 doude, this is a better link on fullstack : http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/development.environment.html#fullstack-tests 15:54:46 tmorin1: yes thanks 15:54:54 matrohon: yes 15:55:22 which means meeting at sometime in the week, and then on Friday morning if need be 15:56:40 ok 15:56:45 anything else for today ? 15:56:54 #topic open discussion, wrap up... 15:57:38 ok, thanks everyone 15:57:40 bye bye... 15:57:45 #endmeeting