15:24:06 <tmorin1> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:24:07 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun  6 15:24:06 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:24:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:24:10 <tmorin1> hi everyone
15:24:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:24:14 <tmorin1> sorry for starting late
15:24:19 <tmorin1> let's see who is here
15:24:36 <tmorin1> matrohon ? pcarver ? doude ?
15:25:21 <pcarver> hi
15:25:25 <tmorin1> hi paul
15:25:39 <pcarver> Totally lost track of time, but I guess I didn't miss much
15:25:49 <tmorin1> I don't have an overwhelming amount of items that I see we should discuss today
15:25:58 <tmorin1> we didn't even start
15:26:04 <tmorin1> I was very late as well
15:26:14 <tmorin1> #topic bugs/gate
15:26:18 <tmorin1> not much to say here
15:26:31 <tmorin1> we merged minor bugfixes
15:26:57 <tmorin1> including a change to pin our dependency to networking-odl, which was (again) causing our functional test to break
15:26:59 <tmorin1> this is solved
15:27:07 <tmorin1> details at : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471230/
15:27:15 <tmorin1> #topic BGPVPN port associations and static routes
15:27:41 <tmorin1> there have been useful/positive reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467277/
15:27:43 <tmorin1> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467277/
15:27:57 <tmorin1> my understanding is that all comments have been addressed
15:28:08 <tmorin1> but I think that more reviews would be useful to have before we merge
15:28:20 <tmorin1> I've asked Nuage folks to review
15:28:40 <tmorin1> having feedback from ODL crowd would be nice as well
15:28:48 <pcarver> I plan to give it another look
15:28:56 <tmorin1> pcarver: this will be welcome
15:29:34 <tmorin1> there is one area where I think the doc is too implicit: what happens when a Port is associated to BGPVPNs and its Network is also associated to a different set of BGPVPNs... ?
15:30:03 <tmorin1> my idea is that the Port should inherit, and hence end up being associated with all which is above it
15:30:20 <tmorin1> and I think we could discuss generalizing this to Port/Network/Router
15:30:23 <pcarver> That seems like a logical approach
15:30:35 <tmorin1> even though, until now, we have prevented doing both Network and Router associations
15:30:59 <tmorin1> https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/networking/v2/#association-constraints
15:31:08 <tmorin1> I think we may want to revisit this constraint
15:31:42 <tmorin1> I'm not sure that the restriction is actually strongly relevant, and we know that it is actually hard to ensure this constraint in backends
15:31:58 <tmorin1> at least in some of them: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1648510
15:31:59 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1648510 in networking-bgpvpn "Constraint enforcment might not work for contrail driver" [Undecided,New]
15:32:07 <tmorin1> so well, food for thought...
15:32:14 <tmorin1> pcarver: anything else to add ?
15:32:49 <pcarver> tmorin1: no, not really. I know there are a few Gerrit notifications from you in my inbox that I need to get to.
15:33:13 <tmorin1> possible, I don't have any specific one in mind though
15:33:19 <tmorin1> I've got (non network related) constraints today, so if nothing else, I would close the meeting.... ?
15:33:21 <tmorin1> ok for you ?
15:33:30 <pcarver> sounds good
15:33:59 <tmorin1> ok, thank you
15:34:10 <tmorin1> let's follow up next week
15:34:11 <tmorin1> bye!
15:34:18 <tmorin1> #endmeeting