15:02:24 <tmorin> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:02:25 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 19 15:02:24 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:02:26 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:02:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:02:36 <tmorin> o/  hi everyone !
15:03:18 <tmorin> let's see who's around... doude ? pcarver ? matrohon ?
15:03:41 <doude> Hi, sorry I could not attend the meeting
15:04:01 <pcarver> hi
15:06:30 <tmorin> hi pcarver
15:06:37 <tmorin> hi doude: np
15:07:44 <tmorin> doude: perhaps time for a short update ? (e.g. an idea on when you could have a look at the firsts port-routes change, confirm you can work on implementing the CLI for port-routes ?)
15:07:53 <tmorin> doude: if not, ok to update on that next wekk...
15:08:26 <tmorin> here is what I had in mind for an agenda:
15:08:33 <tmorin> a) update on port-routes blueprint
15:08:41 <tmorin> b) update on vni API extension
15:08:51 <tmorin> c) CI status
15:09:07 <tmorin> d) dashboard bugs with fixes in progress
15:09:17 <tmorin> e) tempest tests
15:09:29 <tmorin> pcarver: anything you'd like to add ?
15:10:06 <pcarver> tmorin: unfortunately I'm almost completely occupied with Contrail, so no, not really.
15:10:27 <pcarver> Oh, except maybe just an FYI about a review I haven't looked at related to Contrail
15:11:20 <tmorin> pcarver: ok, we'll cover this
15:11:29 <pcarver> Sukdev Kapur did create a review that is related to support for networking-bgpvpn in networking-opencontrail
15:11:47 <tmorin> pcarver: do you have a link ?
15:11:56 <pcarver> I'm looking for it
15:12:39 <pcarver> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499600/
15:12:50 <pcarver> actually from Piotr Zalas, not Sukdev
15:13:21 <tmorin> ok
15:13:42 <tmorin> I guess the implication for networking-bgpvpn would be: doc update ?
15:14:08 <tmorin> another implication could be: run bgpvpn tempest suite as part of networking-opencontrail CI jobs ?
15:15:21 <pcarver> Yes, that's a good idea, but need to see if it should run in the OpenStack CI system or the OpenContrail CI system that we're currently overhauling
15:15:36 <tmorin> true
15:15:54 <pcarver> I'll make a note of that. I need to do further thinking and discussion.
15:16:09 <tmorin> but I guess you need some *voting* CI in openstack, even if its third party (assuming third party can be voting)
15:16:13 <tmorin> ok
15:16:17 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:16:40 <tmorin> #topic ^^ opencontrail bgpvpn driver
15:16:50 <tmorin> #topic update on port-routes blueprint
15:17:04 <tmorin> not much progress on this during the last week (PTG)
15:17:46 <tmorin> an implementation of port association is still waiting for reviews : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481125/
15:17:53 <tmorin> #topic update on vni API extension
15:18:03 <tmorin> this one has seen good progress during last wekk
15:18:04 <tmorin> week
15:18:55 <tmorin> with a few changes pushed by deepthi
15:19:12 <tmorin> https://review.openstack.org/503954 (API definition) and https://review.openstack.org/503951 (CLI)
15:19:29 <tmorin> I think those two are not far from landing
15:19:39 <tmorin> #topic CI status
15:20:14 <tmorin> a failure of a tripleo job has been preventing us from merging during the past 5 days
15:20:30 <tmorin> not a big deal because this was PTG, then week end
15:20:56 <tmorin> the issue is supposed to be resolved by https://review.openstack.org/504977
15:21:31 <tmorin> test in progress to confirm that
15:22:54 <tmorin> EmilienM: if you're around, we (n8g-bgpvpn) would have loved to be able to track the resolution of the failure for job gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario004-multinode-oooq-puppet , which broke our CI -- hopefuly this is resolved now (see ^^)
15:23:15 <tmorin> #topic dashboard bugs with fixes in progress
15:23:36 <tmorin> a few issues in the horizon plugin have been uncovered, and are being tested
15:23:44 <tmorin> #topic tempest tests
15:23:56 <tmorin> the tempest testsuite is being enriched
15:24:17 <tmorin> this is of course good in theory, but also helped uncover a bug in the reference driver
15:24:52 <tmorin> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bgpvpn/+bug/1716893
15:24:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1716893 in networking-bgpvpn "Update of BGPVPN Route Targets breaks connectivity" [Undecided,New]
15:25:11 <tmorin> #topic open discussion
15:25:17 <tmorin> if anything to add ?
15:25:20 <tmorin> pcarver:  ?
15:25:34 <pcarver> nothing for me beyond the Contrail review I shared
15:28:43 <tmorin> pcarver: ok, thanks
15:28:46 <tmorin> we're done then !
15:29:17 <tmorin> rendezvous next week !
15:29:18 <tmorin> bye...
15:29:22 <tmorin> #endmeeting