09:01:33 #startmeeting blazar 09:01:34 Meeting started Tue Jan 17 09:01:33 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masahito. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:01:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:01:37 The meeting name has been set to 'blazar' 09:02:18 priteau won't able to join beginning of today's meeting 09:02:27 This is today's agenda. 09:02:38 1. Action items from last call 09:02:44 hi 09:02:45 2. CFP of the Boston Summit 09:02:53 3. Pike PTL election 09:02:59 4. Status Update 09:03:03 r-mibu: hi 09:03:07 anything else? 09:03:24 r-mibu GeraldK hiro-kobayashi_: hi 09:03:31 hi 09:03:45 hi 09:03:53 tejaswi: hi 09:03:56 tejaswi: hi 09:04:05 Hi 09:04:18 ok. move on first item. 09:04:31 #topic action items from last call 09:05:05 Does anyone have any update for your action item? 09:05:36 I updated the item 2: List ideas for a presentation at Boston Summit 09:05:49 Unfortunatlly, openstack bot didn't work well in last meeting. So I lost the log ;-< 09:05:51 This will be discussed later 09:05:58 it is not on the list: I had presented the Promise gap analysis in yesterday's PWG call. people have an action item to review it by Friday. the general structure seems acceptable 09:06:07 Action items are: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109922.html 09:06:24 hiro-kobayashi_: Thanks :-> 09:06:32 Hello 09:06:42 priteau: Hello 09:06:47 Sorry for my tardiness 09:07:04 next step on the user story will then be to setup a cross-project IRC with Nova, Neutron, Blazar 09:07:52 imho, we first should reach a stable state in Blazar, so we don't have to rush that cross-project IRC 09:08:19 but it would still be good to discuss the way forward in time 09:08:50 GeraldK: +1 09:08:54 GeraldK: Who will facilitate the cross-project IRC? 09:08:54 GeraldK: Do you have the link of the action item in PWG? 09:10:00 masahito: the log of the meeting is here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2017/product_working_group.2017-01-16-21.00.log.html 09:10:24 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2017/product_working_group.2017-01-16-21.00.html 09:10:33 this is the clean version with the action items 09:11:40 GeraldK: Thanks. It's nice :-) 09:12:04 hiro-kobayashi: it should be facilitated by the user story owner, that is shamail. as he is more like an interim owner I guess he would be happy for any kind of support on it 09:12:30 GeraldK: thanks 09:13:00 i guess we may get more feedback once we have submitted this to the repo 09:13:51 Do we need to do any review as Blazar team? 09:15:08 masahito: sure. any feedback comments is appreciated and will help to improve the gap analysis 09:15:15 #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/promise_gap_analysis 09:15:32 If needed, please let us know. Some of us could support it. 09:15:48 Blazar is the main related project in this gap analysis 09:16:03 ok, good. 09:16:17 masahito: thanks for your offer. i will do so. 09:17:04 GeraldK: do you have another update? If not, move on hiro-kobayashi_, he seems to have an update. 09:17:24 no, that is from my side. 09:19:22 mashito: my updates are about CFP of Boston Summit which is next topic 09:19:33 hiro-kobayashi_: got it. 09:19:45 any update for action items? 09:20:08 masahito: I am still working on the differences between API v1 and v2 09:20:20 I am seeing typing issues using the v2 API 09:20:27 I will investigate more 09:21:05 It's possible that DB objects created by API v1 are not compatible with v2 09:22:28 priteau: meaning we need any DB update migrate v1 to v2 without schema migration? 09:23:06 Maybe, but I am hoping that we can support both if it's only little changes to the types 09:23:17 I will report when I find out more 09:23:47 priteau: ok. thanks the great work! 09:24:04 ok, move on next. 09:24:17 #action all to review Capacity mgmt story gap analysis: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/promise_gap_analysis 09:24:26 #topic CFP of the Boston Summit 09:24:31 #action priteau to investigate differences between v1 and v2 API 09:24:43 hiro-kobayashi_: thanks 09:25:13 should we put in again all actions from last meeting that are still open to have everything in one place for the next meeting? 09:25:52 GeraldK: I think so 09:26:09 okay. i will do. 09:26:14 GeraldK: including actions in etherpad? 09:26:31 no. just the ones from the meeting minutes of last time. 09:26:52 oh, got it. 09:26:54 #action all to share information about PTG if there are any updates 09:27:35 well, i got offcial approval for my business trip to PTG 09:27:39 #action Decide when to update the namespace after current in-review patches are merged 09:28:18 sorry, we are just listing action items... 09:28:57 #action Check new features related to OPNFV Promise (All) L139- at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Blazar_status_2016 09:29:04 r-mibu: good to see you at PTG! 09:29:35 I think that's it for the open actions from last meeting. let's continue with the CFPs 09:29:51 it seems we have 3 proposals. 09:30:04 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/blazar-session-boston 09:30:54 what about the proposed presenters? would you agree to this? 09:31:47 the three talks looks good to me. 09:32:01 GeraldK: +1 09:32:16 is there someone from HPE in today's meeting? 09:32:43 if not, I will ping them offline w.r.t to the 2nd talk 09:33:39 I saw tejaswi in beginning of this meeting. 09:33:44 yes 09:34:45 can we agree on a lead per talk to draft a more concrete proposal? 09:34:59 volunteers up :) 09:35:05 GeraldK: +1 09:35:40 I can draft 1 or 2 09:35:51 #action pick up a talk you want to lead from proposed talks. 09:36:34 proposal for leads: 1) hiro-kobayashi NTT, 2) HPE (tejaswi or Madhu), 4) Pierre 09:37:03 GeraldK: I'm ok to lead 1 09:37:17 hiro-kobayashi: +1 09:38:00 GeraldK: I am not sure if there is enough content for a full talk for 4) 09:38:24 I am not sure whether Madhu will be able to come to the meeting 09:38:31 I will ask and let you guys know 09:39:33 priteau, tejaswi: okay. can you please update the page by Friday? 09:40:22 and preferrably inform the team by email such that we can find another lead 09:40:33 ok 09:40:54 and the use case for Blazar in Chameleon is not HPC. It's for reproducible / repeatable computer science experiments 09:41:15 I would be happy to help with talk 1) 09:42:37 priteau: thanks. 09:42:57 I +1 the comment about merging 4) in 1) or 2) 09:43:02 priteau: thanks. 09:43:10 I assume that all proposed presenters (if they agree to be a presenter) will support the preparations. 09:43:35 yes, +1 09:43:38 GeraldK: +1 09:43:43 +1 09:44:09 of course 09:44:19 Anyway, everyone try to update the abstract in the etherpad and make it concrete. 09:45:16 Okay 09:45:23 So, finally we will make 2 proposals? 09:45:52 okay for me. 09:46:18 sounds good 09:46:23 If there is not enough content. 09:46:51 or, maybe you can merge into one depends on contents, i think 09:47:46 r-mibu: +1 09:47:53 +1 09:48:00 +1 09:48:43 +1 09:49:15 #action write down the details of the proposed talks, 1. and 2., then check the contents 09:49:30 is the action right? 09:49:39 +1 09:50:04 +1 09:50:08 +1 09:50:11 +1 09:50:38 thanks lots of +1 ;-) 09:50:43 timecheck 10mins only 09:50:46 GeraldK: 09:50:51 GeraldK: thanks 09:51:11 anything else on CFP? 09:51:57 good. move on next. 09:52:15 #topic Pike PTL election 09:52:33 It's just information for us. 09:53:25 I noticed Pike cycle PTLs self-nomination will happen in next week. 09:54:14 According to the release schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html 09:54:30 #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ 09:54:38 we need new/active PTL for blazar 09:54:43 if you're interested, don't forget to nominate it. 09:54:55 r-mibu: yup. 09:56:07 I'll ping current PTL for blazar, too. 09:57:00 any comments or questions on PTL election? 09:57:43 looks nothing. 09:57:51 #topic status update 09:58:23 last three mins, so if you have any update, feel free to write down here :-) 09:59:08 Just mentioning that we're close to having a functional DevStack installation 09:59:51 priteau: yes. we have good progress. 09:59:58 priteau: cool 10:00:07 priteau: thanks for your works 10:00:34 Thanks for the reviews :-) 10:00:56 runs out of time. 10:01:04 thanks for the work. don't forget to review the open patches. some of them need workflow 10:01:11 thanks all. 10:01:23 GeraldK: yup. 10:01:23 #action review the open patches (all) 10:01:43 #endmeeting