09:00:57 <masahito> #startmeeting blazar
09:00:57 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 11 09:00:57 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masahito. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:00:58 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:01:00 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'blazar'
09:01:09 <masahito> #chair priteau r-mibu
09:01:10 <openstack> Current chairs: masahito priteau r-mibu
09:01:24 <masahito> #topic Roll Call
09:01:41 <priteau> o/
09:01:43 <masahito> o/
09:01:43 <r-mibu> o/
09:02:35 <masahito> Today's agenda is...
09:02:40 <masahito> 1. ocata/branch
09:02:51 <masahito> 2. boston summit talks
09:03:05 <masahito> 3. Pike bp status check
09:03:12 <masahito> anything else?
09:03:16 <GeraldK> hi there
09:03:24 <masahito> GeraldK: hi
09:03:57 <priteau> masahito: forum?
09:04:18 <masahito> priteau: yes. thanks!
09:04:24 <masahito> 4. forum
09:04:37 <masahito> btw, hiro-kobayashi is out of town today.
09:05:23 <masahito> #topic ocata branch
09:05:37 <masahito> Just notification from my side.
09:06:04 <masahito> Gerrit is ready to create branch. then I created stable/ocata branch last week.
09:06:13 <masahito> #link https://github.com/openstack/blazar/tree/stable/ocata
09:06:47 <masahito> if there is any fix needed to backport, we can do it.
09:07:23 <masahito> any comment?
09:07:29 <r-mibu> fyi: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
09:07:35 <priteau> Do we have stable branches for blazar-nova and clients too?
09:08:36 <masahito> as we discuss before, we don't plant to have branches at client side.
09:08:58 <masahito> blazar-nova needs branch?
09:09:09 <priteau> Even if we don't backport patches, I think users may want to install blazar with devstack configured to use stable/ocata
09:09:40 <priteau> If there is no branch, it uses master, but if we make radical changes to master in the future, devstack install of stable/ocata won't work
09:09:52 <priteau> I am thinking in particular of blazar-nova
09:09:59 <r-mibu> +1 to have stable branch for blazar-nova
09:10:15 <masahito> we have release tag instead of branch now.
09:10:36 <masahito> ok, I'll create stable branch for blazar-nova.
09:11:14 <masahito> then, let's go on next.
09:11:35 <masahito> #topic Boston Summit Talks
09:11:58 <masahito> Who added the topic in agenda?
09:12:29 <priteau> I suggested last week that we should talk about it today
09:12:39 <priteau> It was +1 by several people
09:13:00 <GeraldK> we had an offline meeting related to the Promise/Blazar session preparation.
09:13:45 <GeraldK> presentation will cover a) problem statement, b) intro to Blazar and OPNFV Promise, c) Resolutions
09:14:38 <masahito> GeraldK: thanks for update.
09:14:59 <masahito> Do you need any help from this team?
09:15:55 <GeraldK> masahito: we are still in drafting phase. maybe, we will share slides prior to submission for team feedback
09:16:29 <masahito> GeraldK: got it.
09:16:54 <masahito> For project update session, I plan to start preparing this week.
09:17:43 <masahito> The speakers of this talk are priteau, hiro-kobayashi and me.  So I plan to have following three sections.
09:17:46 <priteau> masahito: What do you plan to use? Google Slides is very convenient for collaborating on a presentation
09:18:44 <masahito> a) overview and current activities of Blazar, b) Ocata release and c) Pike release priorities
09:19:37 <masahito> priteau: either Google Slides or PowerPoint sharing mail is ok for me.
09:19:49 <masahito> priteau: do you have any preference?
09:20:03 <priteau> I prefer Google to avoid a lot of back and forth by email
09:20:35 <masahito> priteau: got it.
09:21:31 <masahito> priteau: I think it's better to make outline before writing Google Slide. is it ok to discuss the outline at mail?
09:21:51 <priteau> yes, outline by email or by etherpad
09:22:24 <masahito> I'll send you the mail or etherpad page later.
09:22:41 <priteau> thanks
09:23:20 <masahito> we also have a forum session in Boston summit.
09:23:32 <masahito> #link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/124
09:25:06 <masahito> In this session, we would discuss the requirements from scientific WG. but as tom commented we could discuss "reservation" feature itself here.
09:25:44 <priteau> Do you know how long the session last?
09:25:58 <masahito> maybe 40 mins
09:26:23 <priteau> We won't have much time to discuss Blazar
09:26:52 <masahito> yes.
09:27:29 <masahito> So I'm thinking we should organize some meeting about Blazar itself in another time slots.
09:27:50 <GeraldK> +1 to have a Blazar team meeting
09:28:23 <r-mibu> +1
09:28:38 <priteau> +1
09:28:58 <masahito> I'll send a doodle to manage the time slot next week or later.
09:29:30 <masahito> after forum session time slots are fixed.
09:29:54 <priteau> I better finish planning my Boston schedule then
09:31:25 <masahito> ok.
09:31:36 <masahito> any comments?
09:32:51 <masahito> #topic Pike BP status
09:33:51 <masahito> does anyone have update?
09:34:29 <masahito> I'll start first.
09:34:46 <masahito> I wrote up overview of new instance reservation.
09:34:51 <masahito> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/new-instance-reservation
09:35:05 <masahito> and shared it in openstack-dev ML
09:35:58 <masahito> the details of implementation is still drafting, but please review the overview.
09:36:39 <priteau> Thanks masahito
09:37:07 <masahito> To be clarified why we need "reservation", I focused on motivation/problems.
09:37:44 <masahito> because there are some discussion about "reserving instances" in operators ML
09:38:40 <GeraldK> thanks. that is very useful.
09:39:28 <masahito> any other updates?
09:40:49 <masahito> #topic AOB
09:40:58 <priteau> Still catching up with reviews for me. Work is very busy at the moment
09:42:01 <masahito> priteau: np.
09:43:39 <masahito> if there're patches you want to review, please add comments about it.  we can keep it in review.
09:44:02 <priteau> ok
09:44:43 <GeraldK> masahito: I agree with your statement in one of the changes that as we have a small team, we can have more high level BP specs and do not necessarily need to deep-dive into implementation details yet
09:45:20 <priteau> +1
09:47:40 <masahito> in that case, I think the spec is ready to merge now.
09:47:43 <masahito> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451249/
09:49:17 <masahito> please add +1 if you agree specs or don't disagree specs. because it's very useful for other to check different opinions.
09:49:22 <priteau> I was just reading it this morning, I will try to go over it by the end of the day
09:49:35 <masahito> priteau: Thanks!!
09:49:52 <masahito> I'll chenge its review state
09:51:52 <masahito> if no other items we can finish this meeting earlier today.
09:52:15 <priteau> ok
09:52:32 <GeraldK> okay. thanks and bye.
09:52:45 <masahito> then thanks all!
09:52:51 <priteau> bye all
09:52:51 <masahito> #endmeeting