09:00:26 #startmeeting blazar 09:00:27 Meeting started Tue Jul 9 09:00:26 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is priteau. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'blazar' 09:00:36 #topic Roll call 09:01:35 o/ 09:01:46 o/ 09:01:57 Hi tetsuro and bertys 09:03:39 Masahito said he was on travel today 09:04:35 #topic Code review priorities 09:05:33 tetsuro: I see you resubmitted the spec "Follow resource provider inventories" in the blazar-specs repo. Are there any functional changes to it? 09:06:14 Nope but I think I should amend the assignee and the history 09:06:40 Good idea 09:07:30 Are you planning to work on the implementation of this spec during Train? 09:09:53 Yes I am 09:10:00 Great, thanks. 09:10:15 Let's review this spec quickly then 09:10:36 What about other placement activities, do you have anything else planned? 09:13:10 If I have time I'd like to look into ironic integration. 09:14:03 That would be good especially if we need Nova changes in this cycle, freeze is going to happen soon. 09:14:32 Sorry, I haven't obtained the backtrace you requested yet. Let me send an email right now. 09:16:57 Done, I will try to get the backtrace this week 09:16:57 . 09:17:34 tetsuro: You said you had an answer for cdent's question at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666202/ ? 09:21:27 There's also a new patch from Asmita: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669079/ 09:21:44 Right. I'll have a re-review 09:23:05 Easy reviews of the day: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666924/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669144/ 09:27:02 Thanks for the reviews bertys 09:28:13 Thanks! 09:28:40 I'll take another look at the whole patch series from Asmita 09:28:52 Thanks for the patches for blazar specs tetsuro 09:29:20 thanks priteau and sorry for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/668642/. I have missed this one 09:29:24 pleasure 09:31:04 Let's move to the next topic 09:31:07 #topic Network segment reservation 09:32:01 Network segment reservation has already been implemented downstream for Chameleon (by me) and now Jacob Colleran is pushing it upstream, which is great. 09:32:09 Patch is at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/668749/ 09:32:31 There might still be some Chameleon-specific oddities in the code, I haven't reviewed fully yet. 09:32:42 It's also not passing many tests 09:33:20 I've also started working on a spec so that we can approve the API and DB schema for this feature, will try to finish it soon. 09:33:48 It's a good feature to have in Train to complete our Neutron integration. 09:37:01 ...and looks like that Chameleon has ironic support. Is it possible to upstream it or make it open somehow? 09:37:34 Chameleon relies on Nova changes that were rejected upstream (changes to how host aggregate work) 09:37:48 I see 09:37:51 Instead we've been advised to use placement aggregates 09:38:43 but we could re-use the ironic clients code? 09:39:49 The one that is in Jacob's patch? Yes, though it may need to be made smarter to detect when a host is an Ironic node. 09:40:32 It can be added back later when we have Ironic support upstream 09:40:58 I got it. 09:41:01 Thanks 09:43:38 #topic AOB 09:43:42 Anything else to cover today? 09:44:17 nope 09:44:27 nope 09:44:48 Nothing from me either so we can end early. Thanks for joining folks. 09:44:54 #endmeeting