20:59:59 <eglynn> #startmeeting ceilometer
21:00:00 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 26 20:59:59 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglynn. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:01 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:03 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'
21:00:27 <eglynn> hey folks, I'll be channelling jd__ this evening
21:00:31 <terriyu> o/
21:00:33 <gordc> o/
21:00:35 <llu-laptop> o/
21:00:36 <DanD_> o/
21:00:37 <ildikov_> o/
21:00:49 <gibi> o/
21:00:59 <eglynn> agenda as per usual: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
21:01:11 <eglynn> #topic Milestone status icehouse-3
21:01:27 <eglynn> folks, I suspect ttx has been bending jd__'s ear about icehouse-3 progress
21:01:28 <ildikov_> just a kind reminder: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/ceilometer+branch:master+topic:bp/complex-filter-expressions-in-api-queries,n,z :)
21:01:36 <dhellmann> o/
21:01:52 <eglynn> we're down to wire in terms of BPs making it for i3
21:02:00 <eglynn> #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/icehouse-3
21:02:42 <eglynn> anything that isn't as good as in the bag by week's end will I suspect be culled
21:03:01 <eglynn> does anyone want to draw attention to anything they consider a risk?
21:03:38 <eglynn> we have two BPs still with 'Started' status
21:04:10 <eglynn> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/monitoring-network-from-opendaylight
21:04:22 <eglynn> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/hbase-tests-on-real-backend
21:04:30 <gordc> eglynn: the first bp is actually partially implemented
21:04:38 <eglynn> gordc: cool
21:04:50 <eglynn> anyone got a status on hbase-tests-on-real-backend?
21:04:51 <gordc> the 2nd patchset needs to be reviewed.
21:05:54 <llu-laptop> any patches for the first high one https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/alarm-on-notification?
21:06:03 <eglynn> I've updated the status on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/monitoring-network-from-opendaylight to 'slow progress'
21:06:20 <eglynn> llu-laptop: yeap, litong has proposed patches
21:06:39 <eglynn> ... but there was some disagreement on the best approach to the implementation
21:06:52 <eglynn> ... so, somewhat contraversial
21:06:56 <gordc> eglynn: is that at risk for icehouse?
21:07:27 <dhellmann> gordc: given gate delays and the monday deadline, anything controversial is probably at risk
21:07:55 <eglynn> gordc: I haven't looked at the latest patch set yet, but if it's still not using the events API then I think it is a risk
21:08:41 <gordc> dhellmann: yeah, that's what i was thinking... so basically all bp patches come monday are getting red x? minus the critical item
21:09:00 <dhellmann> gordc: right, unless jd__ wants to file for a FFE for something that's close
21:09:11 <eglynn> dhellmann: agreed, we "landable" patches to be proposed to gerrit by EoD tmrw or absolute latest on Friday for it to be a realistic propospect for icehouse
21:09:32 <dhellmann> right
21:09:39 <gordc> i would suggest we target the items in 'needs code review' for now.
21:09:56 <eglynn> dhellmann: yep, there is the possibility of FFEs being negotiated
21:10:17 <eglynn> (for havana we got a couple of those, but we can't rely on that again)
21:11:39 <eglynn> so anyone with implementation work outstanding (myself included) will have to be looking at end of week as the drop-dead cut-off
21:12:35 <eglynn> ... and of course I'd encourage folks to dedicate any bandwidth they can sapre to reviewing
21:13:16 <eglynn> ... please be selective in your reviews: choose icehouse-3 focused first, and BP-oriented over bug-fixes
21:13:52 <eglynn> ... bug-fixes will be easy to land post-i3, featurefull patches not so much
21:14:25 <ildikov_> what about refactoring code? :)
21:15:02 <gordc> hmm... i thought there was a test against real db bp which was critical priority... i guess that got pulled.
21:15:09 <eglynn> ildikov_: that too, if it addressing clear and present technical debt
21:15:40 <eglynn> ildikov_: (which your db2/mongo dupe-squashing clearly is)
21:15:59 <ildikov_> gordc: that one is the third patch set, query worked for the last time
21:16:17 <eglynn> gordc: yeah, you're right, it was critical ... must have been punted to Juno
21:17:13 <eglynn> k, anything else on icehouse-3?
21:17:21 <eglynn> (other than ... ladies and gentlemen, please fire up your reviewing engines!)
21:17:36 <ildikov_> gordc: I mentioned the new in operator to tongli, he didn't say anything against, but it can be fixed, if it would not work
21:18:27 <gordc> ildikov_: which item is this? the in operator doesn't work for db2?
21:19:45 <gordc> eglynn: i think we can move on... ildikov_ we can discuss over in openstack-ceilometer.
21:19:54 <ildikov_> gordc: the in operator was merged after tongli tested the second patch, I told him that I rebased all the remaining patch sets
21:19:59 <eglynn> gordc: cool, makes sense
21:20:17 <eglynn> so a few more days in heads-down mode from us all will make a big dent in the backlog for icehouse-3
21:20:26 <eglynn> ... so I'd encourage a full-court-press if poss
21:20:32 <eglynn> k, moving on
21:20:46 <eglynn> #topic Tempest integration
21:20:50 <ildikov_> gordc: sure, we can move on
21:20:56 <eglynn> _nadya_ . There is no Tempest update on this week from our side unfortunately :( I will start work on tempest stuff on next week
21:21:23 <eglynn> anything else on tempest?
21:21:46 <sileht> eglynn, latest nova fix for notification have been merged yesterday
21:21:58 <eglynn> sileht: excellent!
21:22:49 <eglynn> #topic Release python-ceilometerclient?
21:22:59 <eglynn> I don't think there's a need for that yet
21:23:07 <eglynn> I've a couple patches in the works for the selectable aggregates
21:23:19 <ildikov_> we have some client code prepared for complex query: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/python-ceilometerclient+branch:master+topic:bp/complex-filter-expressions-in-api-queries,n,z
21:23:20 <eglynn> plus possible the new capabilities API I've proposed
21:23:29 <eglynn> ildikov_: nice!
21:24:15 <eglynn> k, let's aim to cut ceiloclient 1.0.10 once the complex query & selectable aggregate patches land
21:24:27 <ildikov_> so if anyone is interested in have look at, we will appriciate the feedback :)
21:24:56 <eglynn> as long as 1.0.10 is vaguely lined with icehouse, should be fine
21:24:59 <ildikov_> eglynn: nice release number :)
21:24:59 <ildikov_> eglynn: sounds good
21:25:12 <eglynn> s/vaguely lined/vaguely lined up/
21:25:24 <eglynn> #topic Open discussion
21:25:38 <psumkin> hi all I'm Pavel Sumkin. I work in Mirantis, you may know Nadya Privalova _nadya_ from Mirantis. We have 2 full-time developers (I'm _psumkin_ and Leonid Kornilenko _le089_) for Ceilometer. I hope we will strengthen the team soon.
21:26:11 <eglynn> psumkin: welcome! yep, we certainly do know Nadya
21:26:15 <llu-laptop> welcome, psumkin
21:26:18 <terriyu> welcome psumkin
21:26:55 <ildikov_> welcome :)
21:27:06 <psumkin> tnks!
21:28:06 <eglynn> I'd encourage everyone again to look at the Atlanta summit proposals related to ceilometer and vote for whichever ones take your fancy
21:28:12 <eglynn> #link https://www.openstack.org/vote-atlanta/SearchForm
21:28:25 <eglynn> ^^^ type ceilometer in the search box above
21:29:30 <eglynn> good for the project's visibility to have as many ceilo-related presos in the conference track as possible
21:29:58 <terriyu> eglynn: got it!
21:31:23 <eglynn> also it'll soon be time to get your thinking caps on re. design summit sessions
21:32:27 <eglynn> ok, looks like we're running out of open discussion here
21:32:31 <eglynn> ... last call?
21:32:42 <eglynn> ... going, going ...
21:32:50 <eglynn> ... gone
21:32:57 <eglynn> #endmeeting