15:00:32 <ildikov> #startmeeting ceilometer
15:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 11 15:00:32 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ildikov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'
15:01:22 <liusheng> hi
15:02:27 <ljxiash> hi
15:02:32 <sileht> o/
15:02:46 <Guest65333> \o/
15:02:57 <cdent> /o\
15:03:15 <ildikov> _o_
15:03:19 <ljxiash> lol
15:03:45 <jd__> O_-
15:03:53 <cdent> orz
15:04:03 <ildikov> ok, I guess we can start then :)
15:04:14 <ildikov> #topic recurring: roadmap items (new/old/blockers) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Telemetry/RoadMap
15:05:06 <ildikov> we have three weeks left until the freeze
15:05:32 <liamji> o/
15:06:06 <_nadya_> I'm doing POC about Redis for transformers cache. It's quite ready, I need someone to take a look
15:06:07 <ildikov> does anyone have any new items we should dicuss?
15:06:11 <_nadya_> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276714/2
15:06:11 <patchbot> _nadya_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276714/ - ceilometer - [WIP] Add cache abstraction
15:07:43 <_nadya_> also, I'd like to ask Rohit regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
15:07:43 <patchbot> _nadya_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/ - ceilometer-specs - Propose the removal of WSME from ceilometer and aodh
15:07:45 <ildikov> _nadya_: I saw Gordon's comment on it
15:07:58 <ljxiash> I have a spec. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273475/  support collect instance port meters.
15:07:59 <patchbot> ljxiash: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273475/ - ceilometer-specs - Support collect neutron port meters
15:08:11 <ljxiash> patchbot: thanks.
15:08:56 <ildikov> _nadya_: do you want to have a discussion about the cache here or let's do that in the review?
15:09:07 <_nadya_> ljxiash: we need +1 from neutron folks first, could you please ping the to review the new version?
15:09:37 <_nadya_> ildikov: I think, it would be better to do in review
15:09:46 <ljxiash> _nadya_:  yes, I can.
15:10:09 <ildikov> _nadya_: ok, cool
15:10:45 <ildikov> _nadya_: reagrding the spec you linked, is the timing you wanted to discuss?
15:12:17 <_nadya_> ildikov: what spec :)?
15:12:33 <_nadya_> ildikov: ah, cdent's, yes
15:12:39 <ildikov> ljxiash: do you plan this for Mitaka?
15:12:50 <ildikov> _nadya_: that one :)
15:13:09 <_nadya_> ildikov: I cannot imagine how much time it may require
15:14:24 <ildikov> _nadya_: well, I'm not sure either, I think jd__ had dreams about removing WSME a while ago, maybe he has ideas :)
15:15:05 <ildikov> cdent: any idea about how much time/effort would be that change?
15:15:08 <jd__> I think it's mostly cdent dream, but I still agree
15:15:27 <ljxiash> ildikov: We plan to have this spec merged in Mitaka, then we upload the poc code, and finish it in N release.
15:15:30 <cdent> I dream of it, but won't have any chance to do the work. I think rohit was getting interested in doing at least the aodh part.
15:15:36 <cdent> It is probably quite a chunk of work.
15:15:49 <jd__> yup
15:15:55 <ildikov> jd__: ah, ok I didn't remember well then
15:16:02 <cdent> I would guess that it would be a bit foolhardy to make it mitaka unless there is a devoted person.
15:16:03 <ildikov> cdent: yeah, I got that part
15:16:03 <jd__> it might also be a good occasion to define a new version of the API though
15:16:22 <ljxiash> ildikov: does this way work?
15:16:39 <jd__> not sure porting for porting is worth it
15:16:42 <ildikov> jd__: yeah, I had that thought as well
15:17:02 <ildikov> ljxiash: it's fine to finish it in the N-release
15:17:31 <ildikov> ljxiash: I wonder whether we opened the specs for Newton already, I will check
15:18:15 <ildikov> jd__: yeah, it might worth a design session if we consider API change as well
15:18:46 <ildikov> especially as it seems to be a bit in risk for Mitaka from timing perspective
15:20:33 <ildikov> _nadya_: I think we will need to wait for Rohit's answer on the review, I'm a bit skeptic based on the brief discussion above
15:20:50 <_nadya_> ildikov: sure
15:21:30 <ildikov> anything else for blueprints?
15:21:48 <jd__> a design session to define an API? I envy your optimism ildikov
15:22:11 <_nadya_> jd__: +1
15:22:31 <_nadya_> jd__: Monasca+Ceilo ?
15:22:35 <ildikov> jd__: at least to see whether we can use this WSME removal opportunity to smth else, than proting
15:23:05 <ildikov> jd__: but maybe I'm just too optimist :)
15:23:07 <jd__> _nadya_: what's the question?
15:23:44 <ildikov> _nadya_: as a design session or new API?
15:23:44 <jd__> ildikov: yeah, I'm still waiting for someone to propose a new design :)
15:24:09 <_nadya_> I'm talking about Jay Pipes proposal
15:24:16 <ildikov> jd__: :)
15:24:18 <_nadya_> Ceilometer and Monasca are both type:service projects that are both
15:24:18 <_nadya_> performing telemetry functionality in their REST APIs. The API WG should
15:24:18 <_nadya_> work with both communities to come up with a 6-12 month plan for
15:24:20 <_nadya_> creating a ​*single*​ OpenStack Telemetry REST API that both communities
15:24:22 <_nadya_> would be able to implement separately as they see fit.
15:24:52 <jd__> _nadya_: joker
15:25:19 <_nadya_> :)
15:25:30 <ildikov> _nadya_: a-ha, I missed it I think, although I would be surprised if there wasn't any proposal like this...
15:25:35 <jd__> we can nominate cdent, he is both in Telemetry and API-WG
15:25:40 * jd__ flies away
15:26:22 <cdent> yeah, I'm also part of service catalog tng and the general consensus there is that overlapping implemenation of the same service is totally bonkers
15:26:23 <ildikov> _nadya_: when did Jay propose this?
15:26:35 <ildikov> _nadya_: just to see how much time we have left :)
15:26:54 <_nadya_> ildikov: subj is Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Proposal for having a service type registry and curated OpenStack REST API
15:27:13 <jaypipes> _nadya_: I need to write an email to gordon and roland to see what concrete steps we can take towards alignment of the REST API.
15:27:17 <ildikov> _nadya_: cool, tnx, will check
15:27:29 <jd__> this is gonna be epic
15:27:30 <jaypipes> _nadya_: nothing is gonna be done in a short time frame, don't worry ;)
15:27:50 <jaypipes> jd__: drama queen :P
15:27:57 <ildikov> jaypipes: I don't think either of us started worrying here :)
15:27:57 <jd__> lol
15:28:06 <jaypipes> ildikov: :)
15:28:13 <_nadya_> jaypipes: I understand, just wanted to let Ceilo team about this :)
15:28:20 <_nadya_> know
15:28:53 <ildikov> jd__: then it seems we will even have a joint session about API with Monasca :)
15:29:05 <jd__> why not
15:29:51 <_nadya_> one more plea regarding specs: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162167/ . JFYI, I think we will wait for POC from Igor first and I will merge this spec (if everything ok)
15:30:54 <ildikov> _nadya_: cool, sounds good
15:32:18 <ildikov> _nadya_: you can link the POC to the spec, when it's up to address concerns there if there is still any
15:32:29 <_nadya_> ildikov: ok
15:32:48 <ildikov> cool
15:32:58 <ildikov> anything else for specs or APIs?
15:33:44 <ildikov> ok, let's move to the next topic then
15:33:49 <ildikov> #topic aodh topics
15:34:13 <ildikov> liusheng: do you have any updates or heads ups here?
15:35:06 <liusheng> hi ildikov, about the composite alarm, I will upload new patchset
15:35:32 <ildikov> liusheng: ok, cool
15:35:58 <liusheng> sorry, I am almost AFK of community works this week, because of Chinese new year :(
15:35:58 <ildikov> liusheng: do you have any issues with it to raise or it goes well?
15:36:33 <liusheng> I need to address sileht's suggesion
15:36:34 <ildikov> liusheng: yeah, I know, no problem
15:36:43 <ildikov> liusheng: tnx for joining the meeting :)
15:37:03 <jd__> liusheng: happy new year then :)
15:37:07 <_nadya_> happy new year!
15:37:16 <liusheng> thanks :)
15:38:01 <ildikov> liusheng: and also happy new year :)
15:38:34 <liusheng> and also, hope we can help to review the aodhclient's patches
15:38:36 <liusheng> thanks
15:40:00 <ildikov> right, aodhclient patches: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-aodhclient+status:open
15:40:20 <ildikov> anyone who has time please take a look ^^
15:40:48 <ildikov> anything else for Aodh?
15:41:32 <ildikov> #topic ceilometer topics
15:42:12 <ildikov> anything else for Ceilometer than what we discussed above?
15:42:43 <_nadya_> yep, 1 sec
15:43:26 <_nadya_> need more eyes for metadata caching patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267078/10
15:43:46 <_nadya_> ityaptin_ uses oslo cache there, I'm not an expert
15:44:29 <ildikov> _nadya_: are there open questions regarding that one?
15:45:18 <ildikov> _nadya_: I mean what we would need to discuss explicitely
15:45:34 <_nadya_> ildikov: hmm...don't think so, may do it in review
15:45:45 <ityaptin_> ildikov: No questions from my side) it's under development now. But I will be grateful for review )
15:45:46 <liusheng> _nadya_: thanks for the change, I wonder whether that functionality can be easily disable/enable ? :-)
15:46:25 <ityaptin_> liusheng: Yes
15:46:25 <_nadya_> liusheng: yep, it should be able to disable it
15:46:35 <ildikov> ityaptin_: ok, cool, I saw it's in WIP I was just wondering whether there's anything we could move forward here
15:46:39 <liusheng> _nadya_: cool
15:48:37 <ildikov> any other items to Ceilo?
15:49:15 <ildikov> #topic gnocchi topics
15:49:21 <_nadya_> jfyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272644/2
15:50:37 <ildikov> _nadya_: tnx
15:51:32 <ildikov> jd__: sileht: have you seen the patch _nadya_ linked? ^^
15:52:14 <sileht> ildikov, +1
15:53:04 <ildikov> sileht: cool
15:53:20 <ildikov> jd__: sileht: any news about Gnocchi?
15:55:52 <ildikov> ok, I take it as a no, let's move on then :)
15:56:04 <ildikov> #topic Open discussion
15:56:27 <ildikov> anything else we would need to discuss?
15:56:46 <ildikov> you can advertise session proposals to vote on for instance ;)
15:57:13 <cdent> boycot voting, it's marketing bullshit
15:57:34 <ildikov> cdent: I know, we can vote on that too, I'm with you :)
15:57:42 <ildikov> and with jd__ :)
15:58:46 <ildikov> allright, it seems we're finished for today
15:58:54 <jd__> ildikov: sorry, was afk :)
15:59:08 <jd__> Gnocchi 2.0 coming soon!
15:59:23 <ildikov> jd__: \o/ :)
15:59:42 <ildikov> jd__: you have half minute for more news if you have
16:00:14 <jd__> I'll keep it for next week ;)
16:00:21 <ildikov> ok, thanks for joining the meeting everyone
16:00:31 <ildikov> C U next week! :)
16:00:37 <ildikov> jd__: cool ;)
16:00:42 <ildikov> #endmeeting