17:03:43 #startmeeting charms 17:03:44 Meeting started Mon Nov 28 17:03:43 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gnuoy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:03:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:03:49 The meeting name has been set to 'charms' 17:04:01 #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting 17:04:10 * gnuoy gnuoy determine which openstack release the ceilometer micro services will be introduced 17:04:23 I did not do that. Carrying forward 17:04:27 * gnuoy jamespage to identity alternate week slot and get scheduled (carried forward) 17:04:42 I have a review raised - needs a fix but lemme check time 17:04:47 You did that didn't you James ? ^ 17:05:06 Mondays 1000 UTC 17:05:09 the other monday 17:05:12 kk, thanks 17:05:18 * gnuoy all to read through the charm specs: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/charm-specs/ (carried forward) 17:05:26 I have no doubt that everyone has done that 17:05:31 so I'll close that 17:05:36 * gnuoy jamespage allocate days in month for bug squashing. (carried forward) 17:05:57 failing misreably at that 17:06:07 ok, np. I'll carry it forward 17:06:07 I was going to suggest the first thursday of every month? 17:06:11 how dows that sound? 17:06:13 sure, +1 17:06:19 +1 17:06:21 +1 17:06:29 +1 17:06:54 kk, thanks everyone 17:07:18 ok I'll sen the note 17:07:20 #topic State of Development for next Charm Release 17:07:53 anyone have something they'd like to highlight? 17:08:08 sure we have three new charms inbound 17:08:19 that is true 17:08:22 mistral, trove and murano (thanks gnuoy for raising the pc changes) 17:08:29 np 17:08:32 and I think tinwood is almost there with manila landing 17:08:35 \o/ 17:08:43 yes, manila is about to land 17:08:54 there is the charm-helper update/sync which will be required for ocata support in the non-layer/reactive charms 17:08:56 oh and I need to loop in the cloudkitty charm developer - I want to get their charm into the project as well 17:09:07 I'll reply to his mail via the list! 17:09:31 I need a pc change to pull in charm templates too fwiw 17:09:55 gnuoy, ++ pls 17:10:10 gnuoy, you're about to start on the memcache support for token caching right? 17:10:26 Right, I'll be onto that tomorrow I hopw 17:10:29 * hope 17:10:30 \o/ 17:10:48 ok, I'm about to move on if anyone wants to jump in before that... 17:11:02 #topic High Priority Bugs 17:11:02 we still have an outstanding issue where all src/layer charm repos are gate-blocked on a tox behavior change which now causes missing (undefined) tests to fail. 17:11:20 everyone should take a sec and read the last comment here real quick: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399299/ 17:11:23 beisner, to we have a pc change up to fix that? 17:11:52 beisner, ah, ok 17:11:58 which seems to say, that we will be forced to add a no-op shim for py27 in the charm repos instead of not-testing-py27 on python3-only charms /o\ 17:12:14 It's not ideal but *shrug* 17:12:37 I'm with gnuoy -- just put a comment in the tox.ini 17:12:52 so although i did get the project configs sorted in a way where we can start moving charms to the python3 only bucket as they're ready, TC isn't there just yet. 17:13:25 duct tape it is /o\ /o\ 17:14:22 :( 17:14:28 We've tripped over some bugs with Juju and secgroups and Juju and volumes. 17:14:28 what the actual.. 17:14:36 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1645298 17:14:36 Launchpad bug 1645298 in juju "unable to removed units with attached storage with OpenStack Mitaka" [Undecided,New] 17:14:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1625624 17:14:46 Launchpad bug 1625624 in juju-core "juju 2 doesn't remove openstack security groups" [Critical,Triaged] 17:14:59 seem to be mitaka+ specific 17:15:44 Anyone got any others bugs they'd like to highlight? 17:16:04 ... 17:16:12 #topic Openstack Events 17:16:35 PTG! 17:16:36 jamespage, You've got one on Thursday, right? 17:16:38 Feb 20th 17:16:41 oh yes 17:16:46 OpenStack Meetup in London 17:17:03 not speaking about charms specifically but will be doing a lighting talk on LXD containers in OpenStack 17:17:31 Sounds good. 17:17:37 jamespage, can you talk py27 retirement with tc as ptl? with our py3 push, we'll need a clear path forward. 17:17:48 I can 17:17:52 gnuoy, pls action me 17:17:53 many thanks 17:18:08 #action jamespage talk py27 retirement with tc as ptl 17:18:24 ta 17:18:26 #topic Open Discussion 17:18:40 jamespage, "just think of the virtualenvs you won't have to build for no-ops" ;-) 17:20:01 anything to openly discuss before i end the meeting? 17:20:23 ... 17:20:31 #endmeeting