17:05:57 #startmeeting charms 17:05:58 Meeting started Mon Jun 12 17:05:57 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is coreycb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:05:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:06:01 The meeting name has been set to 'charms' 17:06:02 o/ 17:06:09 #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting 17:06:24 Dmitrii-Sh track the network-binding not being able to be changed after deploy/add-unit. 17:06:48 Dmitrii-Sh: do you have an update on that? 17:07:16 coreycb: it is still deep in the backlog 17:07:28 coreycb: haven't seen any activity on the feature 17:07:39 Dmitrii-Sh: ok should we keep that as an action? 17:07:52 coreycb: I don't think so 17:08:01 Dmitrii-Sh: ok 17:08:17 coreycb: I will track it separately as it seems like a difficult feature to implement 17:08:22 Dmitrii-Sh: thanks 17:08:23 that might end up a won't fix 17:08:31 #topic State of Development for next Charm Release 17:08:31 coreycb: besides, MAAS is agentless 17:09:04 sorry, feel free to continue discussing the prior item 17:09:33 coreycb: MAAS doesn't have agents, so technically you cannot change the network config on a node 17:09:50 yup it is what it is from the point of being provisioned 17:09:50 however, there are other possibilities like SDN or VPN connections 17:10:04 where you can add interfaces dynamically 17:10:09 it might happen to have a connection, but its not assured unless specified during deployment I think 17:10:10 same with vlan interfaces by the way 17:10:29 jamespage: yes 17:10:58 Dmitrii-Sh: ack alright well keep us posted 17:11:09 coreycb: thx 17:11:32 there are some prior items listed for "State of Development for next Charm Release" but not sure i need to paste or not 17:11:52 well i will 17:11:57 zesty amulet? how's that? 17:12:02 One to go! 17:12:14 thedac: w00t! 17:12:19 the LXD charm has small bug still 17:12:35 thedac: keeping with you, next is Snaps in charms 17:13:01 Still working on the keystone PoC workging. Getting all the dependencies to use session based auth 17:14:13 fnordahl: hi, would you be able to comment on our policy.json work? 17:14:14 thedac: ok. i want to get to the bottom of that. i wonder if it's related to the issue i'm debugging with oslo.config's default config paths. 17:14:31 coreycb: could be, we can touch base after the meeting 17:14:47 thedac: ok 17:14:59 next item is Internal-DNS 17:15:00 are we going to get a spec for snaps in charms? 17:15:02 thedac: yes. so far I have determined that it is a pure Horizon issue. 17:15:36 wolsen: you and your perfectly reasonable requests. Yes, I'll start working on that 17:15:58 for internal-dns, code has been implemented and has landed - still need amulet and mojo tests... my load has lightened a bit I should be able to get some progress on those this week 17:16:11 wolsen: awesome, congrats 17:16:12 fnordahl: thanks for working on that. I suppose that is relatively good news. Though fixing it in horizon may be difficult 17:16:34 its available in master, so if anyone wants to use it for their own fun clouds... bugs welcomed 17:16:51 thedac: I'll look into it. Have previous experience on inner workings of Horizon. I did some networking code in the past (I implemented the subnet-pool support) 17:17:07 fnordahl: fantastic. Thanks. 17:17:07 thedac: fnordahl: want me to add policy.json to the agenda list for state of dev? 17:17:19 coreycb: sure 17:17:50 ok done 17:18:04 anything else for state of development? 17:18:09 need to add glusterfs charm 17:18:30 wolsen: yes, let's do 17:18:48 wolsen: i'll add that. cholcombe are you around for an update on glusterfs charm? 17:18:59 coreycb: yeah what's up? 17:19:23 cholcombe: just getting updates on state of charm development. have short summary? 17:19:50 i'm working through the review on the charm and doing test deployments. it hasn't gotten much further than installing the packages and formatting the drives 17:20:14 i'm thinking about a publishing a spec to formalize things a bit more but i'm under a very tight deadline 17:21:16 cholcombe: ok thanks for the update 17:21:24 :) 17:21:57 #topic High Priority Bugs 17:22:07 https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms/+bugs 17:22:14 does anyone know in which state were the merge proposals for https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/glance-simplestreams-sync/+bug/1611987 left in? 17:22:16 Launchpad bug 1611987 in OpenStack glance-simplestreams-sync charm "glance-simplestreams-sync charm doesn't support keystone v3" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Liam Young (gnuoy) 17:22:18 Use stable-backport tag for bugs http://tinyurl.com/charm-stable-backports 17:23:04 yes, they need to be rebased but feature-wise 17:23:09 Dmitrii-Sh: smoser was asking about those this morning. I need to get a handle on what needs doing still 17:23:40 ok 17:23:45 fyi, my response wasn't in response to Dmitrii-Sh 17:23:52 just from the agenda skeleton 17:23:56 ack 17:25:00 do we have any status on the critical bugs? 17:25:54 cholcombe: do you have any news on bug 1675186? 17:25:56 bug 1675186 in OpenStack ceph-osd charm "ceph-osd storage-attached hook fails" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1675186 - Assigned to Chris Holcombe (xfactor973) 17:26:06 coreycb: I do not. If anyone is free to look at those it would be appreciated 17:26:27 also there is bug 1478980 17:26:27 bug 1478980 in OpenStack hacluster charm "If the principle updates a resource parameter of an already configured resource hacluster ignores it" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1478980 17:26:31 coreycb: i don't have any updates on it no. 17:26:35 the other 2 critical bugs have fixes commited 17:26:48 yeah a couple need reviews, I'll take a look at those 17:27:56 ok moving on 17:28:04 #topic Openstack Events 17:28:15 coreycb: the hooks/install has netifaces in the dependencies. i think i can close that bug 17:29:01 cholcombe: cool :) 17:29:06 cholcombe: storage attached hook runs before install iirc 17:29:12 PTG in September 17:29:15 cholcombe: you may want to just confirm it 17:29:19 any other events? 17:29:24 wolsen: oh that's right. nvm 17:29:29 wolsen: i will 17:30:02 ok moving on 17:30:04 #topic Open Discussion 17:30:15 does anyone have anything else to discuss? 17:30:35 Question: have anyone looked at supporting partitions for ceph osd journals yet? Can I safely assume that this is free for taking? 17:31:06 Dmitrii-Sh: feel free 17:31:23 Dmitrii-Sh: specifying a specific partition for the osd journal other than what is created w/ external journals? 17:31:49 ok, my customer's use-case is splitting an ssd into two partitions and using one for journaling and another for read optimization with bcache 17:31:49 * wolsen trying to understand which level of support is being targeted 17:31:57 ok 17:32:17 Dmitrii-Sh: yeah there's nothing on the roadmap for that yet 17:32:43 ok, thx for the info 17:32:46 the ceph charms are not getting any major additions this cycle so snaps can be focused on 17:33:15 Dmitrii-Sh: outside contributions are always encouraged though :) 17:33:45 Dmitrii-Sh: I'm curious if you'd be able to get away with that today actually 17:33:56 oh except for the journal zapping thing 17:34:07 nevermind me, explore at your own leisure 17:34:15 wolsen: I will take a look today 17:34:36 wolsen: I don't have much time on it anyway, so I might need to get it done fast :^) 17:34:40 Dmitrii-Sh: k, if the journal isn't zapped I think you can probably do it with the current charms :) 17:34:56 we can talk after if needed 17:35:02 yes, let's do it 17:35:12 #topic Next Chair 17:35:14 jamespage 17:35:19 is the next chair 17:35:26 thanks everyone! 17:35:28 #endmeeting