10:02:03 <tinwood> #startmeeting charms
10:02:04 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Feb 11 10:02:03 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tinwood. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
10:02:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
10:02:08 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'charms'
10:02:12 <tinwood> Hi everybody
10:02:20 <fnordahl> Morning
10:02:31 <tinwood> So, first topic
10:02:39 <tinwood> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
10:02:50 <tinwood> I don't think there is anything on this one?
10:02:59 <fnordahl> Not that I am aware of
10:03:16 <tinwood> Okay, in that case, let's move on
10:03:23 <tinwood> #topic State of Development for next Charm Release
10:05:37 <tinwood> The charm-specs for the current cycle are at https://github.com/openstack/charm-specs/tree/master/specs/stein and they should be viewable on openstack.org but I'm not sure where
10:06:25 <tinwood> So we are progressing ceph-rdb mirroing, keystone-goal-state and radosgw multisite
10:07:04 <tinwood> We're also pushing ahead with renaming the lxd subordinate charm to nova-lxd to free the lxd name up for more interesting (but potentially not openstack) usage.
10:07:13 <tinwood> anyone want to add anything else?
10:08:23 <tinwood> okay, in that case:
10:08:26 <icey> Progress is being made on codifying the OpenStack Security Guide in the charms
10:08:34 <tinwood> ah good
10:08:55 <tinwood> #topic High Priority Bugs
10:09:18 <tinwood> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms/+bugs
10:09:18 <tinwood> Use stable-backport tag for bugs  http://tinyurl.com/charm-stable-backports
10:09:18 <tinwood> Critical bugs: https://tinyurl.com/osc-critical-bugs
10:09:18 <tinwood> High priority bugs: https://tinyurl.com/osc-high-priority
10:09:48 <tinwood> No criticals, however, quite a few highs.
10:09:55 <tinwood> But many of them are old.
10:10:17 <tinwood> It begs the question; if a bug is 3 years old, is it really a 'high'?
10:11:01 <fnordahl> Good point, I guess some cleaning up is due
10:11:57 <tinwood> Yes, I'm wondering if a bug discussion is needed to come up with some policies about de-prioritising bugs that sit around for a long time.  i.e. it can't actually be high if it's 3 years old -- or maybe it is.
10:12:17 <tinwood> 'High' means "fix soon"
10:13:05 <tinwood> anyway, I guess we should have a think and come back at that this topic when more people have had a chance to think about it.
10:13:14 <tinwood> Any more on bugs?
10:13:54 <fnordahl> Not from me
10:13:58 <tinwood> Okay, then we go to:
10:13:58 <icey> pass
10:13:59 <tinwood> #topic Openstack Events
10:14:11 <tinwood> I don't know of any upcoming ones? fnordahl?
10:14:18 <icey> There's an Ops Meetup coming to Berlin soon, but I don't think we'll have anybody there
10:14:31 <tinwood> And berlin is such a nice place!
10:14:47 <icey> indeed!
10:14:53 <fnordahl> We were present on the Config Mgmt camp in Ghent last week
10:15:01 <tinwood> Good point fnordahl
10:15:17 <tinwood> Unfortunately, gnuoy isn't with us today to let us know what happened.
10:15:23 <fnordahl> And I guess the next big event is Open Infrastructure Summit in April, followed by the PTG
10:15:24 <icey> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BER-ops-meetup
10:15:35 <tinwood> thanks icey
10:16:09 <tinwood> Shall we move to Open Discussion?
10:16:14 <fnordahl> Go for it
10:16:22 <tinwood> #topic Open Discussion
10:16:26 <tinwood> The floor is open
10:16:49 <fnordahl> I want to bring up the OpenStack Infra GitHub integration
10:17:00 <tinwood> sure
10:17:30 <fnordahl> We want to use that since it fits nicely with our new functional test workflow with Zaza and the actual functional tests living in GitHub
10:17:59 <fnordahl> However, it has proven a bit brittle, I brought it up in the #openstack-infra channel last week and at least we got a confirmation that it is a WIP
10:18:32 <fnordahl> If everyone could take a moment to think about how we should attack this and chime in on the ML thread that would be great http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002488.html
10:18:34 <tinwood> For the uninitiated, is this around using github hooks to do tests? or something else
10:18:50 <fnordahl> Depends-On: <github URL>
10:19:37 <tinwood> fnordahl, oh, I didn't know that was a feature
10:20:32 <fnordahl> It is, but it has some issues.  Would be great to have it work 100%
10:20:55 <tinwood> that might mean we need to delve into zuul code? :)
10:21:39 <tinwood> okay, but action to think about how to do it and chime back to ML thread
10:22:14 <tinwood> #action all read http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002488.html (zaza, zuul and depends-on: github url) and consider a response.
10:22:28 <fnordahl> thx tinwood
10:22:41 <tinwood> np
10:22:49 <tinwood> anything else for this topic?
10:23:13 <fnordahl> Not from me
10:23:31 <tinwood> okay, then let's finish up
10:23:45 <tinwood> #topic Next Chair
10:23:52 <tinwood> and it's fnordahl
10:23:55 <fnordahl> \o/
10:23:58 <icey> party time!
10:24:10 <tinwood> Are you around in 2 weeks.  Actually, aren't we all in Malta?
10:24:36 <icey> may be worth having anyways, as we'll have almost the entire core team present
10:24:51 <tinwood> Okay, 2 weeks it is.
10:25:01 <tinwood> #endmeeting