16:00:04 #startmeeting Cinder 16:00:05 Meeting started Wed Apr 26 16:00:04 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:08 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 16:00:17 ping dulek duncant eharney geguileo winston-d e0ne jungleboyj jgriffith thingee smcginnis hemna xyang1 tbarron scottda erlon rhedlind jbernard _alastor_ bluex karthikp_ patrickeast dongwenjuan JaniceLee cFouts Thelo vivekd adrianofr mtanino yuriy_n17 karlamrhein diablo_rojo jay.xu jgregor baumann rajinir wilson-l reduxio wanghao thrawn01 chris_morrell watanabe.isao,tommylikehu mdovgal ildikov 16:00:20 Hello 16:00:23 wxy viks ketonne abishop sivn breitz 16:00:24 Hi 16:00:25 hey 16:00:27 hi 16:00:29 o/ 16:00:30 hi 16:00:32 #topic Announcements 16:00:33 hi 16:00:33 o/ 16:00:34 hey 16:00:43 \o 16:00:58 o/ 16:01:00 hi 16:01:19 If anyone knows of folks that have left and are still in that ping list, please feel free to update the Cinder Meeting wiki to remove them. 16:01:23 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:01:28 I have a feeling there are at least a handful there. 16:01:35 o/ 16:01:38 hemna: Gettin fancy 16:01:45 hi 16:01:56 smcginnis: :-( 16:02:16 Hello :) 16:02:38 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-spec-review-tracking Review focus 16:02:47 We got a few specs approved over the last week. 16:03:11 Let's make sure those are tracked on the etherpad and that reviewers are checking there to direct their focus 16:03:52 Only other announcement I can think is just awareness of the Summit/Forum coming up real quick. 16:04:15 Hi 16:04:22 o/ 16:04:35 one week away? 16:04:35 #topic [Generalized filters] Unify API response for invalid query parameters(tommylikehu) 16:04:46 thanks, smcginnis 16:04:59 tommylikehu: Pretty much a week. I leave a week from this Saturday. 16:05:00 Have we considered this before? 16:05:25 tommylikehu: Can you give a high level summary of what that is? 16:05:27 I think it's easy just make our choice, remove or raise error : ) 16:05:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417441 API-WG guideline. 16:05:43 smcginnis: you could tell from the links 16:06:11 just about the api behaviour when we input some invalid querys 16:06:19 tommylikehu: So the idea is we should be consistent about returning 400 errors on filters? 16:06:36 IMO, API guidelines are reasonable here. 400 bad request is a good option for such cases 16:06:53 e0ne: i agree 16:06:54 or consistent in ignoring the invalid filters 16:07:11 we have different behaviours now 16:07:51 tommylikehu: we need to fix it to have the same behaviour everywhere 16:07:52 I am not a fan of ignoring. 16:07:53 we should be consistent about raising 400s 16:07:58 e0ne: ++ 16:08:06 e0ne, + 16:08:16 so, we all agreed on that :) 16:08:27 I think so. 16:08:30 tommylikehu: Looks like it. :-) 16:08:38 There's the concern that is always raised about changing behavior. 16:08:51 great! 16:08:55 sounds like a bug fix to me 16:09:00 But I think in this case, we've just been silently failing, so probably OK in most cases. 16:09:17 smcginnis: unfortunately, we can't write API once and don't change it forever:( 16:09:24 Yeah, it sounds like a big fix. 16:09:28 *bug 16:09:31 :) 16:09:37 e0ne: Yep 16:09:41 big bug fix:) 16:09:43 I would be surprised if people were counting on silent failure. 16:09:49 hemna, jungleboyj a bug fix for almost list APIs? 16:09:49 e0ne: Freudian slip. 16:09:50 <_alastor_> o/ 16:10:00 almost all the list APIs 16:10:22 yah if we are inconsistent now, then fixing that inconsistency seems like a bug fix to me. 16:10:32 hemna, ok 16:10:41 hemna: +1 16:10:45 hemna: +1 16:10:57 tommylikehu: Yeah, I think it would be good to get it consistent. That would be a good thing to work on. 16:11:08 smcginnis: I will 16:11:17 hemna (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ 16:11:28 tommylikehu: Great, thanks! 16:12:04 The table flip bot is in this channel too? 16:12:18 not yet.... 16:12:20 !! 16:12:21 smcginnis: Error: "!" is not a valid command. 16:12:24 :{ 16:12:30 but he can be 16:12:55 #topic Open Discussion 16:13:01 bswartz_: I had to copy that from another channel. 16:13:02 Anything else? Light agenda again. 16:13:12 what about beer event at the summit? 16:13:25 e0ne: Ah, the important things! :) 16:13:30 e0ne: :) 16:13:38 or is it a topic for the next meeting? :) 16:13:42 A Cinder group get together would be fun to do again. 16:13:45 e0ne: :-) The summit is a beer event. ;-) 16:13:53 Never too early to start planning that. ;) 16:13:54 jungleboyj: +2 16:14:01 Couldn't be happier about the force_detach test breaking my driver. But I think we discussed that enough yesterday. Still think the test is wrong. 16:14:05 * DuncanT is jealous and hates you all 16:14:09 Get to Fenway early. 16:14:16 And bring your badge. 16:14:35 Drink tickets and food tickets to the first 2k people 16:14:35 DuncanT, I know your feelings :( 16:14:40 DuncanT: I will have a few for you. 16:14:40 We miss you DuncanT. 16:14:49 DuncanT: No chance of attending? 16:15:01 smcginnis: Not a hope for this one :-( 16:15:04 DuncanT: might be able to get you a hotel if you can get there. 16:15:28 DuncanT: :-( 16:15:47 diablo_rojo_phon: Too late for me to sort anything I suspect, I'll look at flights after this meeting though just in case 16:16:06 There might be something unexpectedly cheap 16:16:09 Fenway ? 16:16:24 hemna: Official party is back. At Fenway 16:16:34 RedSox game? 16:16:40 DuncanT: Let me know. Otherwise start looking for cheap stuff for the next PTG in Denver 16:16:56 hemna: the game that night is away 16:17:03 boo 16:17:05 But they will be showing it on the screens 16:17:13 @! 16:17:13 hemna (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ 16:17:18 Hah 16:17:33 hemna: blame the brewers 16:17:37 OK, anything else worth being recorded as part of the meeting? :) 16:17:40 They will be in MKE 16:17:54 nobody wants to be in MKE 16:18:04 hemna: +1 16:18:08 Alright, thanks everyone. 16:18:14 @!h 16:18:14 jungleboyj (/ .□.) ︵╰(゜Д゜)╯︵ /(.□. ) 16:18:19 #endmeeting