16:01:06 #startmeeting Cinder 16:01:07 Meeting started Wed Jul 25 16:01:06 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jungleboyj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:11 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 16:01:13 o/ 16:01:18 hello 16:01:19 Courtesy ping: jungleboyj DuncanT diablo_rojo, diablo_rojo_phon, rajinir tbarron xyang xyang1 e0ne gouthamr thingee erlon tpsilva patrickeast tommylikehu eharney geguileo smcginnis lhx_ lhx__ aspiers jgriffith moshele hwalsh felipemonteiro lpetrut lseki _alastor_ 16:01:20 <_alastor_> o/ 16:01:31 hi 16:01:33 hi 16:01:59 Hey 16:02:01 hi! o/ 16:02:21 @! 16:02:21 <_pewp_> jungleboyj ヘ(°¬°)ノ 16:02:57 Hey, I thought you guys might be interested in this blog by freenode staff member Bryan 'kloeri' Ostergaard https://bryanostergaard.com/ 16:02:57 or maybe this blog by freenode staff member Matthew 'mst' Trout https://MattSTrout.com/ 16:03:01 Read what IRC investigative journalists have uncovered on the freenode pedophilia scandal https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Freenodegate 16:03:01 16:03:04 This message was brought to you by Private Internet Access 16:03:04 hi 16:03:07 Give people another minute to join 16:03:11 Hey, I thought you guys might be interested in this blog by freenode staff member Bryan 'kloeri' Ostergaard https://bryanostergaard.com/ 16:03:13 hhi 16:03:14 or maybe this blog by freenode staff member Matthew 'mst' Trout https://MattSTrout.com/ 16:03:14 * jungleboyj sighs 16:03:17 Read what IRC investigative journalists have uncovered on the freenode pedophilia scandal https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Freenodegate 16:03:21 16:03:24 This message was brought to you by Private Internet Access 16:03:51 Hey, I thought you guys might be interested in this blog by freenode staff member Bryan 'kloeri' Ostergaard https://bryanostergaard.com/ 16:03:51 or maybe this blog by freenode staff member Matthew 'mst' Trout https://MattSTrout.com/ 16:03:54 Read what IRC investigative journalists have uncovered on the freenode pedophilia scandal https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Freenodegate 16:03:54 16:03:57 This message was brought to you by Private Internet Access 16:04:17 Hate people spamming IRC. 16:04:30 +1 16:05:00 Ok, lets get started. 16:05:26 Hey, I thought you guys might be interested in this blog by freenode staff member Bryan 'kloeri' Ostergaard https://bryanostergaard.com/ 16:05:40 Friendly reminder to update the PTG Planning Etherpad if you are going to be attending: 16:05:47 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ptg-planning-denver-9-2018 16:06:06 Have 6 of us on there right now. 16:06:14 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ptg-planning-denver-9-2018 16:06:33 We are at feature freeze: 16:06:44 #link https://releases.openstack.org/rocky/schedule.html 16:07:22 So, we are at Feature Freeze, Will do final client library releases. It is also Hard String Freeze and Requirements Freeze 16:07:29 It is just freezing out there. 16:07:47 We are working towards an RC-1 the week of 8/6. 16:07:58 and it's about 90F outside :( 16:08:08 e0ne: :-) 16:08:25 Does anyone still have a multi-attach patch to get in for their driver? 16:09:25 Soft string freeze actually, but still good to try to avoid any translation string changes as much as feasible. 16:09:38 Since we only translate exception strings now, that's a lot easier than it was. 16:09:56 Ok, I have been a bit lax about the freeze for the multi-attach patches. If we are missing any please let me know ASAP. 16:10:06 smcginnis: Ah, thank you. I misread that. 16:10:56 Otherwise we shouldn't approve anything but bug fixes. 16:11:10 Also, documentation changes are still safe to merge. 16:11:34 Any other comments from our fearless release manager? 16:11:52 Nope, all sounds good. 16:11:59 Ok. Cool. 16:12:19 #topic Rocky Priorities Review. 16:12:21 client libraries release this week? 16:12:42 tbarron: yes 16:12:50 tbarron: Correct 16:12:51 tbarron: Yes, I was going to take a look at which ones needed another spin and do that. 16:13:06 I haven't looked today, but we were in pretty good shape there. 16:14:08 smcginnis That was what I was thinking., 16:14:38 Hmm, this one may be an issue with the server side API schema validation now: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573622/ 16:15:45 smcginnis: Can you elaborate? 16:15:56 but we bumped the microversion? 16:17:40 jungleboyj: With this change - https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/48b8973aed73e9dc88288607aecc4da6a69d94ac 16:18:10 tommylikehu: Yeah, it will just be an issue if someone uses a MV at 3.53 or later. 16:18:19 for json schema validation in manila (just getting off the ground) we've asked that it begin at a new microversion so that at old microversions we won't raise an error when 16:18:36 junk is supplied in the body of the request 16:18:41 smcginnis: ok 16:18:44 tbarron: That's a much safer approach I suppose. 16:18:46 since we don't raise an error now 16:18:54 just fwiw 16:18:56 smcginnis: ++ 16:19:14 tbarron: We're probably too far down the road to adjust for that now. 16:19:36 smcginnis: ack, just hindsight here :) 16:19:46 ++ 16:20:16 hindsight is the best sight 16:20:18 So, it looks like we should get that change in or how do we want to go forward? 16:20:24 jgriffith: :-) 16:20:30 20/20 16:20:42 jungleboyj: I'd like to see that one go through. There's also a couple other ones there that are ready. 16:20:58 gouthamr was our prime mover on that :D 16:21:32 Ok. Lets work on getting patches needed for the client in. 16:21:56 #action smcginnis and jungleboyj to work on merging client changes after the meeting. 16:22:07 And any others that can help too! 16:22:48 smcginnis: ++ 16:22:52 * smcginnis looks at jgriffith's review numbers 16:23:07 :) 16:23:08 Wow, that isn't even passive aggressive 16:23:17 :D 16:23:22 Ok, moving on. 16:23:45 Looking at what came out of the Rocky Review priorities. 16:23:49 :) 16:24:00 We have the scheduler fixes/improvements. 16:24:08 The initial approach was abandoned. 16:24:43 now we have the proposal to move to the Placement service: 16:24:52 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559718/ 16:25:13 How do we want to proceed with this? 16:25:17 +1 16:25:36 but I don't think we'll be able to do it next two or three releases 16:25:42 I thought we had decided this wasn't so evil at the Summit but not sure that we have changed geguileo 's mind. 16:25:53 e0ne: Ok. 16:26:10 jungleboyj: nobody convinced me to do that stuff 16:26:20 jungleboyj: I still believe it's a bad idea 16:26:22 IMO, it's good to use it once placement will be moved out of nova 16:26:25 that's true 16:26:43 I believe even then it's not a good idea 16:26:51 why? 16:27:03 because we don't need all that complexity 16:27:25 it may seem easy to pass the problem to other service 16:27:35 geguileo: You going to be at the PTG? 16:27:39 so now it will no longer be "our" problem 16:27:44 jungleboyj: yes 16:27:53 * jungleboyj does a happy dance 16:27:58 lol 16:28:15 Ok, so I think we need to discuss this there with the Placement Service people in the room and nail down the path forward. 16:28:25 jungleboyj: +1 16:28:41 and if I'm the only one against it, well, that's too bad for me 16:28:47 +1 16:28:48 :-) Sounds good. 16:29:04 So, I am going to move that work forward to Stein and put it on the PTG discussion list. 16:29:05 geguileo: i've got a lot of the same concerns but want to learn more 16:29:22 #action jungleboyj To add Placement Service to PTG etherpad. 16:29:29 tbarron: yeah, they may be able to convince me and we'll all be happy 16:29:33 if there's going to be a generally available outside-nova placement service 16:29:35 tbarron: Come join the fun then! 16:30:01 jungleboyj: I believe that's already on the etherpad. 16:30:34 smcginnis: You are right. cdent added that. 16:30:40 Forgot that. 16:30:43 Ok, so we are all good. 16:31:13 The other one I had a question on was the Replication Backend Promotion. 16:31:21 It looks like we merged that. 16:31:38 The Spec was merged in Queens. Any concerns with moving it forward to the Rocky directory? 16:31:51 If we didn't merge the change until rocky we should move that forward. 16:32:16 Ok. I will push that up. 16:32:20 Like this one - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561425/ 16:32:40 Also make sure that what we implemented looks like what was documented. 16:32:46 ++ 16:33:11 :-) Ok cool. And I will look at the one you linked there. 16:34:00 Any other concerns? 16:34:37 #topic HA Development Progress: 16:34:48 #link https://review.openstack.org/571242 16:35:03 Looks like geguileo pushed up another patch. It is failing the check. 16:35:23 We should all take a quick look through the document and see if we can still get that merged in Rocky. 16:35:36 jungleboyj: I'm checking right now, but at least it should have all requested changes 16:35:38 Since it is a doc change we have a little time but want to make sure it isn't forgotten. 16:35:44 geguileo: ++ 16:36:14 Anything else to report there? 16:36:26 jungleboyj: it looks like somehow I removed the link to drivers_locking_examples :-( 16:36:36 :-( 16:36:45 I'll go fix it now 16:36:52 geguileo: Thank you. 16:37:04 So, that is all I had for topics. 16:37:15 #topic open discussion 16:37:28 Anyone have other topics for today? 16:39:04 *crickets* 16:40:16 Ok if no one has anything else I will wrap up the meeting. 16:40:35 Nothing from me. 16:40:47 Ok. Thanks everyone! 16:40:53 #endmeeting