16:00:58 <jungleboyj> #startmeeting Cinder 16:00:59 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Aug 28 16:00:58 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jungleboyj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:00 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:02 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 16:01:07 <smcginnis> o/ 16:01:25 <woojay> \o 16:01:28 <enriquetaso> o/ 16:01:31 <jungleboyj> courtesy ping: jungleboyj whoami-rajat rajinir lseki carloss pots woojay erlon geguileo eharney rosmaita enriquetaso e0ne smcginnis davidsha walshh_ xyang hemna _hemna tosky 16:01:37 <geguileo> hi! o/ 16:01:44 <jungleboyj> @! 16:01:45 <_pewp_> jungleboyj ヾ(-_-;) 16:01:54 <rosmaita> o/ 16:01:58 <davidsha> o/ 16:01:59 <eharney> hi 16:02:02 <whoami-rajat> Hi 16:02:13 <xyang> hi 16:02:19 <jungleboyj> Happy Wednesday! 16:03:00 <jungleboyj> Hope everyone is well. Will give people another minute to assemble. 16:03:59 <jungleboyj> Ok. Lets get started. 16:04:04 <davee_> o/ 16:04:06 <jungleboyj> #topic announcements 16:04:13 <jungleboyj> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderTrainMidCycleSummary 16:04:29 <jungleboyj> I have gotten the summary of last week's mid-cycle posted. 16:04:30 <tosky> o/ 16:04:41 <jungleboyj> It includes links to videos of the sessions. 16:04:45 <eharney> thanks for putting that together 16:04:53 <davidsha> Thanks! 16:05:09 <rosmaita> yeah, nicely done 16:05:11 <jungleboyj> Had some really good discussion together and appreciate all those that attended remotely. Even timezones made it challenging. 16:05:19 <jungleboyj> Thank you all. :-) 16:05:36 <jungleboyj> Please look at the Action Items and address those that are assigned to you. 16:05:44 <jungleboyj> Also check the list for the HELP NEEDED items. 16:05:55 <jungleboyj> Those are things that are free to be taken on. 16:06:21 <enriquetaso> ++ 16:06:41 <jungleboyj> Also, I think that rosmaita is planning to send out a survey on what we want to do for future mid-cycles. Please watch for that. 16:07:02 <rosmaita> will try to get that out before the weekend 16:07:09 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: Thank you. 16:07:25 <jungleboyj> Not a huge hurry, but obviously the earlier we start, the better. 16:07:48 <jungleboyj> That was all I had for announcements. 16:07:56 <jungleboyj> #topic releases update 16:08:01 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: All your's. 16:08:09 <rosmaita> ok, the Train release of os-brick has to happen next week 16:08:17 <rosmaita> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/os-brick+branch:master 16:08:26 <rosmaita> bunch of recent stuff that looks ok, some older items with no reviews, and some older items with problems 16:08:27 <whoami-rajat> jungleboyj: may i have the etherpad link ? 16:08:43 <jungleboyj> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-meetings 16:08:58 <rosmaita> would probably be a good idea to use the Review Priority to put +2RP on stuff we absolutely want to get in 16:09:07 <whoami-rajat> jungleboyj: thanks 16:09:08 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: ++ 16:09:14 <eharney> i set +RP on the cryptsetup deprecation, should really get that in for this cycle 16:09:30 <rosmaita> ok, great 16:09:34 <rosmaita> btw, cinderlib is on a different release schedule, so Train release doesn't have to happen until after the cinder Train release 16:09:56 <jungleboyj> Good. Thank you for verifying that. 16:10:03 <rosmaita> the Train release of python-cinderclient has to happen the week after (week of Sept 9) 16:10:11 <rosmaita> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/python-cinderclient+branch:master 16:10:17 <rosmaita> this is going to include bumping the client from 4.3.0->5.0.0 16:10:24 <rosmaita> so we certainly need to get all the version change stuff merged (for example, v1 support removal) 16:10:42 <jungleboyj> ++ 16:10:48 <whoami-rajat> I think the pdf generator is also a goal for train, not much important but good to get in. 16:11:03 <rosmaita> right, i think hemna said he has that working for the client 16:11:12 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: He did. 16:11:17 <rosmaita> cool 16:11:39 <rosmaita> so basically, we need all cores to pay attention to brick and the client over the next 2 weeks 16:11:47 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: ++ 16:11:57 <rosmaita> that's all from me 16:12:28 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: Cool. Thank you! 16:12:38 <jungleboyj> Appreciate you continuing to watch the releases. 16:13:04 <jungleboyj> #topic Replication. 16:13:15 <jungleboyj> This was an item of discussion from the mid-cycle. 16:13:35 <jungleboyj> Is anyone really making use of this? 16:13:39 <jungleboyj> Have customers used it? 16:13:54 <jungleboyj> Reaching out to the vendors here to see what you all know? 16:14:49 * jungleboyj hopes everyone is typing busily but guessing that isn't the case. 16:15:10 <jungleboyj> Has anyone even tested the functionality recently? 16:15:20 <eharney> a good amount of work went into getting it working with Ceph not too long ago 16:15:29 <smcginnis> Might be good to post this to -discuss and -ops too. 16:15:50 <jungleboyj> eharney: ++ That is good. So we have some confidence that it at lest works for one driver. :-) 16:16:00 <jungleboyj> smcginnis: Yeah, thinking that might be the next step. 16:16:13 <smcginnis> I've seen some vendors interested in making sure it is working, but I have not actually heard of any end users using it. 16:17:13 <jungleboyj> smcginnis: Yeah, that was what I was afraid of. 16:18:19 <jungleboyj> Ok. So I am guessing there is no more discussion to have right now then. 16:18:37 <jungleboyj> I can send an e-mail to -discuss and -ops to see if we get a response there. 16:18:50 <smcginnis> Might get more of a response than you've gotten here. :D 16:19:22 <jungleboyj> One can hope. 16:19:55 <jungleboyj> Ok. That was all that I had for topics today then. 16:20:04 <jungleboyj> #topic Open Discussion 16:20:32 <jungleboyj> Anyone have anything else to discuss today? 16:20:35 <enriquetaso> hey, I'm still looking for reviews in the bACKUP Incremental patch 16:20:49 <enriquetaso> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/627941/ 16:20:55 <enriquetaso> :P 16:21:11 <enriquetaso> I've fixed all the comments 16:21:18 <whoami-rajat> So as per geguileo 's review, my patch is ready to merge in cinderlib [1] but hasn't received any functionality reviews on the main cinder patch[2] 16:21:18 <whoami-rajat> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674826/ 16:21:19 <whoami-rajat> [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639180/ 16:21:22 <jungleboyj> Ok. I can look at that again. 16:21:36 <eharney> the rbd incr patch seemed like it was about there last time i looked at it, can take another look 16:21:48 <enriquetaso> thanks eharney 16:22:45 <jungleboyj> eharney: Good. Want to get that in but definitely want you and geguileo to weigh in. 16:23:10 <geguileo> jungleboyj: I'll try to get another grumpy look at the patch 16:23:21 <enriquetaso> geguileo++ 16:23:23 <jungleboyj> geguileo: Don't be grumpy, be happy. :-) 16:23:36 <geguileo> XD 16:25:12 <jungleboyj> https://gph.is/1tN18rB 16:25:31 <jungleboyj> So, can take a look at the requested reviews. Any other topics? 16:26:34 <zhengMa> Hi team, we have solved the 'merge' problem, I think our patch is ready for reviewing. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/668825 16:26:34 <jungleboyj> Ok. Taking silence as a no. 16:26:38 <zhengMa> Thanks! 16:27:56 <jungleboyj> On that note it appears we could all use 30 minutes to go do code reviews. 16:28:13 <rosmaita> yes! 16:28:25 <jungleboyj> :-) Ok. Go forth and review. 16:28:28 <smcginnis> Thanks! 16:28:32 <jungleboyj> Thanks all for attending. 16:28:38 <jungleboyj> #endmeeting