16:01:20 <jungleboyj> #startmeeting cinder
16:01:21 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Oct  2 16:01:20 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jungleboyj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:21 <e0ne> hi
16:01:21 <lseki> \o
16:01:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
16:01:25 <davee_> 0/
16:01:30 <rosmaita> o/
16:01:34 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  is impatient today.
16:01:38 <jungleboyj> @!
16:01:39 <_pewp_> jungleboyj (^▽^)/ ʸᵉᔆᵎ
16:01:41 <rosmaita> :D
16:01:43 <geguileo> XDXD
16:01:46 <smcginnis> .o.
16:01:46 <woojay> o/
16:02:04 <jungleboyj> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-meetings
16:02:13 <enriquetaso> o/
16:02:25 <davidsha> o/
16:02:30 <walshh_> hi
16:02:59 <xyang> Hi
16:03:41 <jungleboyj> Hello everyone.
16:04:02 <jungleboyj> So, lets get started.
16:04:11 <jungleboyj> #topic announcements
16:04:27 <jungleboyj> I will actually hand off to rosmaita  as it appears all the announcements are his.
16:04:29 <jungleboyj> :-)
16:04:56 <rosmaita> ok, first, a reminder about the process to get stuff into Train at this point:
16:05:03 <rosmaita> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009816.html
16:05:21 <rosmaita> and we are collecting potential backport candidates on an etherpad:
16:05:37 <rosmaita> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-backport-potential
16:05:49 <rosmaita> please put stuff on the etherpad, it may be missed otherwise
16:06:03 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  Thank you for putting that together.
16:06:08 <rosmaita> we missed some docs that need to go in, so we will be doing an RC-2
16:06:25 <rosmaita> maybe on monday?
16:06:36 <e0ne> do we need to wait for some translations?
16:06:47 <smcginnis> Was just going to say that - translations may be coming.
16:06:49 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  That makes sense.
16:06:53 <smcginnis> So waiting until next week should be good.
16:07:04 <rosmaita> i have seen a few translations landing in other projects
16:07:14 <rosmaita> e0ne: thanks for pointing that out
16:07:30 <e0ne> rosmaita: you are welcome!
16:07:44 <rosmaita> it's a light agenda, so maybe we can review the backport candidates later in open discussion
16:07:58 <jungleboyj> ++
16:08:17 <rosmaita> ok, so quick reminder of dates
16:08:31 <rosmaita> final RC is basically one week from tomorrow
16:08:38 <rosmaita> train release is week after that
16:08:53 <rosmaita> PTG for ussuri cycle is week of november 4
16:09:10 <rosmaita> on which note, please add topics to the planning etherpad
16:09:20 <rosmaita> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ussuri-ptg-planning
16:09:34 <rosmaita> final announcement
16:09:48 <rosmaita> i've proposed releases from the stable branches for cinder
16:10:00 <rosmaita> none of the other components need a release right now
16:10:12 <rosmaita> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-releases-tracking
16:10:31 <jungleboyj> Awesome.
16:10:34 <rosmaita> that's all from me
16:11:27 <jungleboyj> So, we only had one other topic for today that was supposed to come up last week.
16:11:44 <jungleboyj> #topic Outreachy Internship Mentors
16:12:02 <enriquetaso> Well.. Outreachy is not accepting any more mentors or projects ideas. I guess the deadline was yesteday or so..
16:12:15 <enriquetaso> I've submitted a project for tempest. The idea is to work on the tempest list https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=test-coverage (still WIP). The intern may help to improve/add test cases scenarios.
16:12:34 <rosmaita> that sounds worthwhile
16:12:51 <enriquetaso> I'm waiting for applicants.
16:13:20 <jungleboyj> :-(  Sorry we took too long.
16:13:30 <enriquetaso> don't worry :)
16:13:40 <jungleboyj> So it sounds like something we should plan for next time.
16:13:56 <enriquetaso> yep
16:14:20 <enriquetaso> :)
16:14:21 <rosmaita> yes, maybe we can ask the Outreachy coordinator to put the deadlines on the release schedule?
16:14:41 <jungleboyj> Thanks for adding the info a bug for future rference.
16:14:43 <rosmaita> they're not strictly release related, but a lot of people will definitely see them there
16:15:12 <enriquetaso> #link  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=test-coverage
16:15:58 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  ++ That is a good idea.
16:16:14 <jungleboyj> I feel like the outreachy stuff often gets missed in various ways.  That may be our fault though.
16:16:45 <enriquetaso> there is some kind of schedule in the web https://www.outreachy.org/... the internship should start in December
16:17:06 <rosmaita> my email filters have still not recovered from the transition to openstack-discuss, and i wind up missing various announcements
16:17:56 <jungleboyj> enriquetaso:  So are you going to keep creating bugs as necessary.
16:18:09 <rosmaita> we can all probably help in that effort
16:18:11 <jungleboyj> or workitems.
16:18:14 <enriquetaso> yes jungleboyj
16:18:15 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  ++
16:18:22 <enriquetaso> rosmaita++
16:19:20 <jungleboyj> enriquetaso:  Anything else then?
16:19:35 <enriquetaso> everybody is welcome to check the current tempest, I think a part of them don't check anything relevant or are failing
16:19:48 <jungleboyj> :-(
16:19:50 <enriquetaso> jungleboyj, nothing else to add. :)
16:20:06 <jungleboyj> enriquetaso:  Ok.  So, we can switch to open discussion
16:20:11 <jungleboyj> #topic Open-Discussion
16:21:06 <rosmaita> kind of quiet in here
16:21:12 <jungleboyj> Are there any other topics today?
16:21:17 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  Yes.
16:21:37 <rosmaita> if no one has anything, let's go over the train-backport-potential bugs
16:21:52 <jungleboyj> That sounds good.
16:22:30 <rosmaita> but i notice from the timestamps that i am being really impatient today, i only waited 1 minute
16:22:42 <jungleboyj> No, you are all good.
16:23:11 <rosmaita> ok, the etherpad to look at is: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-backport-potential
16:24:31 <rosmaita> first up is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678561
16:24:49 <rosmaita> jay already said it's good for backport if there's an RC-2, which there will be
16:24:57 <jungleboyj> Yeah, we talked about that.
16:25:13 <jungleboyj> It is limited to the driver.  Think it is safe to backport.  If they haven't proposed I can do one.
16:25:31 <rosmaita> i don't think a backport was cherry-picked yet
16:25:39 <jungleboyj> Yeah, they don't have it yet.  I will do that.
16:26:17 <rosmaita> ok, next one is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672145/
16:26:41 <jungleboyj> I think that is good to backport.  It is a doc change.  Low risk.
16:27:17 <rosmaita> yes, and the reason i'd like to backport is that there might be some refactoring around this in U
16:27:30 <rosmaita> so it would be good to have the docs available somewhere in case things change
16:27:49 <jungleboyj> Ok.  So I would push up the backport and we will merge it as soon as it goes into master.
16:28:08 <rosmaita> ok, cool
16:28:08 <tosky> (doc backports are always good)
16:28:39 <rosmaita> next is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685881/
16:29:15 <rosmaita> that looks important
16:29:46 <jungleboyj> Yes, I think we need to merge that and get it into RC2.
16:31:09 <rosmaita> this one is a test fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685103/
16:31:58 <rosmaita> low risk, might as well backport it?
16:32:13 <jungleboyj> Agreed.
16:32:18 <rosmaita> ok
16:32:49 <rosmaita> next one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682780/
16:32:58 <rosmaita> has merged
16:33:17 <rosmaita> and already been cherry picked, i am behind the times
16:33:27 <jungleboyj> Yep and it is docs.  That should be good.
16:33:51 <rosmaita> yes, we already had a question in IRC becasue the train release note mentions this doc!
16:34:26 <rosmaita> ok, next one is already in the gate for stable/train (virtuozzo driver unsupported)
16:34:39 <jungleboyj> Ok, the accelerator one is now merging.
16:34:49 <rosmaita> great
16:34:55 <jungleboyj> Yeah, this just missed reviews.
16:35:20 <jungleboyj> Should get it in as they are way out of the supported CI requirements.
16:35:39 <rosmaita> ok, final one is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683696/
16:36:00 <jungleboyj> It just merged this morning so would appreciate reviews on the backport.
16:37:01 <rosmaita> jungleboyj: which one do you mean?
16:37:18 <jungleboyj> The Virtuozzo driver.
16:37:27 <rosmaita> ok, that's in the gate now, i think
16:38:29 <rosmaita> any opinion on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683696/ -  NetApp SolidFire: Add options for replication mode
16:38:39 <rosmaita> it adds an option but looks pretty low impact
16:39:37 <smcginnis> Seems like new functionality that missed the cutoff.
16:39:43 <jungleboyj> This is another one that we missed getting reviews on.
16:39:44 <smcginnis> But yeah, low impact and limited to driver.
16:40:10 <rosmaita> yes, my thought is that we had very low reviewer bandwidth last week, so i'm inclined to say this is ok
16:40:29 <lseki> \o/
16:40:37 <jungleboyj> Yeah, it was kind of our fault.
16:40:39 <rosmaita> hopefully it doesn't put us on a slippery slope
16:40:47 <smcginnis> Not happy with the release note, but that's not a blocker.
16:41:15 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: True.  I think this is the last one I know that we missed somewhat.
16:41:25 <smcginnis> Also no CI results yet.
16:41:43 <lseki> smcginnis: it's running right now
16:42:16 <lseki> I'll let you know when it finishes
16:42:19 <jungleboyj> So lets keep an eye on that one and say it is approved.
16:42:36 <lseki> ++
16:42:44 <dviroel> ++
16:43:03 <rosmaita> ok, the next one says "new features" in the title
16:43:14 <rosmaita> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675929 - PowerMax Docs -  New features and supported software
16:43:35 <walshh_> docs, not sure if the same rules apply but adding for review
16:43:50 <rosmaita> ok, its docs
16:43:55 <rosmaita> that changes things
16:44:01 <smcginnis> Documenting things that have already landed, right walshh_?
16:44:09 <walshh_> correct
16:44:15 <smcginnis> Then we definitely should get that in.
16:44:20 <rosmaita> agreed
16:44:49 <rosmaita> i am really slow on the uptake this morning, it also says "docs" in the title of both of these
16:44:58 <rosmaita> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682696 - PowerMax Docs -  Short host and port group name changes
16:45:14 <walshh_> yes, a separate review because a candidate for backporting to Stein
16:46:17 <rosmaita> ok, walshh_ can you keep an eye on these and put up backports after they are approved and merge to master?
16:46:19 <jungleboyj> Yeah, that is fine to merge and backport.
16:46:21 <jungleboyj> Docs are good.
16:46:30 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  ++
16:46:36 <walshh_> great thanks
16:46:45 <jungleboyj> Then we can keep an eye on the etherpad.
16:47:48 <jungleboyj> So I am marking both docs patches as being ok for backport.  Any objections?
16:48:09 <rosmaita> not from me, these are appropriate backports
16:48:43 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  Awesome.  A bit more than we usually have but thankfully nothing that is a major oopsie.
16:48:54 <rosmaita> ok, great ... we just need stable-maint cores to keep an eye on the etherpad to approve the backports after they land
16:49:06 <jungleboyj> rosmaita:  Can do.
16:49:30 <rosmaita> hopefully the translations will land soon and we can cut RC-2
16:50:29 <rosmaita> ok, that's all about train-backport-potential
16:51:16 <jungleboyj> Awesome.
16:51:34 <jungleboyj> Any other questions/concerns for today.
16:52:15 <jungleboyj> Going once ...
16:53:00 <jungleboyj> Ok.  Thank you for everyone helping review the backports.  Feel like we can have some confidence with how Train is going out the door which is awesome.
16:53:20 <jungleboyj> Lets call it a meeting then.
16:53:25 <jungleboyj> #endmeeting