16:01:20 #startmeeting cinder 16:01:21 Meeting started Wed Oct 2 16:01:20 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jungleboyj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:21 hi 16:01:21 \o 16:01:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:24 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 16:01:25 0/ 16:01:30 o/ 16:01:34 rosmaita: is impatient today. 16:01:38 @! 16:01:39 <_pewp_> jungleboyj (^▽^)/ ʸᵉᔆᵎ 16:01:41 :D 16:01:43 XDXD 16:01:46 .o. 16:01:46 o/ 16:02:04 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-meetings 16:02:13 o/ 16:02:25 o/ 16:02:30 hi 16:02:59 Hi 16:03:41 Hello everyone. 16:04:02 So, lets get started. 16:04:11 #topic announcements 16:04:27 I will actually hand off to rosmaita as it appears all the announcements are his. 16:04:29 :-) 16:04:56 ok, first, a reminder about the process to get stuff into Train at this point: 16:05:03 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-September/009816.html 16:05:21 and we are collecting potential backport candidates on an etherpad: 16:05:37 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-backport-potential 16:05:49 please put stuff on the etherpad, it may be missed otherwise 16:06:03 rosmaita: Thank you for putting that together. 16:06:08 we missed some docs that need to go in, so we will be doing an RC-2 16:06:25 maybe on monday? 16:06:36 do we need to wait for some translations? 16:06:47 Was just going to say that - translations may be coming. 16:06:49 rosmaita: That makes sense. 16:06:53 So waiting until next week should be good. 16:07:04 i have seen a few translations landing in other projects 16:07:14 e0ne: thanks for pointing that out 16:07:30 rosmaita: you are welcome! 16:07:44 it's a light agenda, so maybe we can review the backport candidates later in open discussion 16:07:58 ++ 16:08:17 ok, so quick reminder of dates 16:08:31 final RC is basically one week from tomorrow 16:08:38 train release is week after that 16:08:53 PTG for ussuri cycle is week of november 4 16:09:10 on which note, please add topics to the planning etherpad 16:09:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ussuri-ptg-planning 16:09:34 final announcement 16:09:48 i've proposed releases from the stable branches for cinder 16:10:00 none of the other components need a release right now 16:10:12 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-releases-tracking 16:10:31 Awesome. 16:10:34 that's all from me 16:11:27 So, we only had one other topic for today that was supposed to come up last week. 16:11:44 #topic Outreachy Internship Mentors 16:12:02 Well.. Outreachy is not accepting any more mentors or projects ideas. I guess the deadline was yesteday or so.. 16:12:15 I've submitted a project for tempest. The idea is to work on the tempest list https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=test-coverage (still WIP). The intern may help to improve/add test cases scenarios. 16:12:34 that sounds worthwhile 16:12:51 I'm waiting for applicants. 16:13:20 :-( Sorry we took too long. 16:13:30 don't worry :) 16:13:40 So it sounds like something we should plan for next time. 16:13:56 yep 16:14:20 :) 16:14:21 yes, maybe we can ask the Outreachy coordinator to put the deadlines on the release schedule? 16:14:41 Thanks for adding the info a bug for future rference. 16:14:43 they're not strictly release related, but a lot of people will definitely see them there 16:15:12 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=test-coverage 16:15:58 rosmaita: ++ That is a good idea. 16:16:14 I feel like the outreachy stuff often gets missed in various ways. That may be our fault though. 16:16:45 there is some kind of schedule in the web https://www.outreachy.org/... the internship should start in December 16:17:06 my email filters have still not recovered from the transition to openstack-discuss, and i wind up missing various announcements 16:17:56 enriquetaso: So are you going to keep creating bugs as necessary. 16:18:09 we can all probably help in that effort 16:18:11 or workitems. 16:18:14 yes jungleboyj 16:18:15 rosmaita: ++ 16:18:22 rosmaita++ 16:19:20 enriquetaso: Anything else then? 16:19:35 everybody is welcome to check the current tempest, I think a part of them don't check anything relevant or are failing 16:19:48 :-( 16:19:50 jungleboyj, nothing else to add. :) 16:20:06 enriquetaso: Ok. So, we can switch to open discussion 16:20:11 #topic Open-Discussion 16:21:06 kind of quiet in here 16:21:12 Are there any other topics today? 16:21:17 rosmaita: Yes. 16:21:37 if no one has anything, let's go over the train-backport-potential bugs 16:21:52 That sounds good. 16:22:30 but i notice from the timestamps that i am being really impatient today, i only waited 1 minute 16:22:42 No, you are all good. 16:23:11 ok, the etherpad to look at is: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-train-backport-potential 16:24:31 first up is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678561 16:24:49 jay already said it's good for backport if there's an RC-2, which there will be 16:24:57 Yeah, we talked about that. 16:25:13 It is limited to the driver. Think it is safe to backport. If they haven't proposed I can do one. 16:25:31 i don't think a backport was cherry-picked yet 16:25:39 Yeah, they don't have it yet. I will do that. 16:26:17 ok, next one is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672145/ 16:26:41 I think that is good to backport. It is a doc change. Low risk. 16:27:17 yes, and the reason i'd like to backport is that there might be some refactoring around this in U 16:27:30 so it would be good to have the docs available somewhere in case things change 16:27:49 Ok. So I would push up the backport and we will merge it as soon as it goes into master. 16:28:08 ok, cool 16:28:08 (doc backports are always good) 16:28:39 next is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685881/ 16:29:15 that looks important 16:29:46 Yes, I think we need to merge that and get it into RC2. 16:31:09 this one is a test fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685103/ 16:31:58 low risk, might as well backport it? 16:32:13 Agreed. 16:32:18 ok 16:32:49 next one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682780/ 16:32:58 has merged 16:33:17 and already been cherry picked, i am behind the times 16:33:27 Yep and it is docs. That should be good. 16:33:51 yes, we already had a question in IRC becasue the train release note mentions this doc! 16:34:26 ok, next one is already in the gate for stable/train (virtuozzo driver unsupported) 16:34:39 Ok, the accelerator one is now merging. 16:34:49 great 16:34:55 Yeah, this just missed reviews. 16:35:20 Should get it in as they are way out of the supported CI requirements. 16:35:39 ok, final one is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683696/ 16:36:00 It just merged this morning so would appreciate reviews on the backport. 16:37:01 jungleboyj: which one do you mean? 16:37:18 The Virtuozzo driver. 16:37:27 ok, that's in the gate now, i think 16:38:29 any opinion on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/683696/ - NetApp SolidFire: Add options for replication mode 16:38:39 it adds an option but looks pretty low impact 16:39:37 Seems like new functionality that missed the cutoff. 16:39:43 This is another one that we missed getting reviews on. 16:39:44 But yeah, low impact and limited to driver. 16:40:10 yes, my thought is that we had very low reviewer bandwidth last week, so i'm inclined to say this is ok 16:40:29 \o/ 16:40:37 Yeah, it was kind of our fault. 16:40:39 hopefully it doesn't put us on a slippery slope 16:40:47 Not happy with the release note, but that's not a blocker. 16:41:15 rosmaita: True. I think this is the last one I know that we missed somewhat. 16:41:25 Also no CI results yet. 16:41:43 smcginnis: it's running right now 16:42:16 I'll let you know when it finishes 16:42:19 So lets keep an eye on that one and say it is approved. 16:42:36 ++ 16:42:44 ++ 16:43:03 ok, the next one says "new features" in the title 16:43:14 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675929 - PowerMax Docs -  New features and supported software 16:43:35 docs, not sure if the same rules apply but adding for review 16:43:50 ok, its docs 16:43:55 that changes things 16:44:01 Documenting things that have already landed, right walshh_? 16:44:09 correct 16:44:15 Then we definitely should get that in. 16:44:20 agreed 16:44:49 i am really slow on the uptake this morning, it also says "docs" in the title of both of these 16:44:58 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682696 - PowerMax Docs -  Short host and port group name changes 16:45:14 yes, a separate review because a candidate for backporting to Stein 16:46:17 ok, walshh_ can you keep an eye on these and put up backports after they are approved and merge to master? 16:46:19 Yeah, that is fine to merge and backport. 16:46:21 Docs are good. 16:46:30 rosmaita: ++ 16:46:36 great thanks 16:46:45 Then we can keep an eye on the etherpad. 16:47:48 So I am marking both docs patches as being ok for backport. Any objections? 16:48:09 not from me, these are appropriate backports 16:48:43 rosmaita: Awesome. A bit more than we usually have but thankfully nothing that is a major oopsie. 16:48:54 ok, great ... we just need stable-maint cores to keep an eye on the etherpad to approve the backports after they land 16:49:06 rosmaita: Can do. 16:49:30 hopefully the translations will land soon and we can cut RC-2 16:50:29 ok, that's all about train-backport-potential 16:51:16 Awesome. 16:51:34 Any other questions/concerns for today. 16:52:15 Going once ... 16:53:00 Ok. Thank you for everyone helping review the backports. Feel like we can have some confidence with how Train is going out the door which is awesome. 16:53:20 Lets call it a meeting then. 16:53:25 #endmeeting