14:01:59 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder 14:01:59 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Oct 2 14:01:59 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:59 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:59 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 14:02:03 <jbernard> #topic roll call 14:02:05 <jbernard> o/ 14:02:10 <rosmaita> o/ 14:02:10 <simondodsley> o/ 14:02:14 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-dalmatian-meetings 14:02:17 <jungleboyj> o/ 14:02:24 <eharney> o/ 14:03:48 <tosky> o/ 14:04:46 <jbernard> thanks for joining everyone 14:04:56 <jbernard> this is the final week of the dalmatian cycle 14:05:12 <jbernard> thanks to everyone who contributed! 14:05:56 <jbernard> our rc candidates are in good shape, so there is no stress going into the final release (that I'm aware of) 14:06:09 <jbernard> next week we start the Epoxy cycle 14:06:23 <jbernard> specs, ptg topics, planning, etc 14:07:54 <jbernard> im working on the cinder-specific milestones for epoxy, im trying to match as close as I can to what we had for dalmatian 14:08:17 <jbernard> that being said, if there is any scheduling/deadline feedback, im happy to hear it 14:08:33 <jbernard> wrt spec freeze, feature freeze, etc 14:08:48 <jbernard> otherwise it's a relatively quiet week 14:09:06 <jbernard> no shortage of reviews however ;) 14:09:59 <jbernard> there is an openinfra live event tomorrow morning 14:10:10 <jbernard> im going to provide a cinder summary there 14:10:49 <rosmaita> \o/ 14:10:51 <jbernard> that's about all I have, personally 14:11:02 <jungleboyj> Cool. 14:11:29 <jbernard> the floor is open 14:11:34 <jbernard> #topic open discussion 14:12:12 <tosky> I wanted to thank everyone for the reviews on the open cinder-tempest-plugin patches in the last days 14:12:12 <simondodsley> anyone going to Indianapolis for the OpenInfra thing in a couple of weeks? 14:12:50 <tosky> I just have one more as you can see in the agenda, which is a bit tricker but covers a "tech debt" in terms of implementation (and then we can later discuss if we want to move those clients into tempest proper) 14:13:16 <mmalchuk> any chance to get backports merged? 14:13:16 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/917728 14:13:46 <mmalchuk> 5 months on review( 14:14:03 <eharney> needs review by the unmaintained- branch team 14:14:24 <eharney> (917728) 14:14:30 <mmalchuk> could you please add them to the review? thanks 14:14:50 <rosmaita> mmalchuk: there's an #openstack-unmaintained irc channel, you should probably ask in there 14:15:09 <jungleboyj> ++ 14:15:23 <eharney> will that be the standard place to route those? 14:15:43 <rosmaita> probably? 14:16:06 <mmalchuk> rosmaita ask again there 14:16:08 <rosmaita> we should probably watch for an "unmaintained" session at the PTG 14:16:38 <rosmaita> or i will ask them to schedule something, so we have a better idea how to handle these 14:17:27 <mmalchuk> no answer last month. I've asked already a month ago 14:18:03 <rosmaita> ok, we need to get some kind of clarity ... i will follow up 14:18:15 <jbernard> i added a note to the ptg etherpad 14:18:18 <jbernard> as well 14:18:28 <rosmaita> jbernard: ++ 14:22:46 <jbernard> alright, i think that's it then 14:22:49 <jbernard> thanks everyone 14:22:55 <jbernard> #endmeeting