14:02:54 #startmeeting cinder 14:02:54 Meeting started Wed Jan 22 14:02:54 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:02:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:02:54 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 14:02:59 #topic roll call 14:03:00 o/ 14:03:01 o/ 14:03:09 o/ 14:03:13 o/ 14:03:23 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-meetings 14:03:47 o/ 14:03:55 o/ 14:04:08 hello 14:04:21 o/ 14:05:12 o/ 14:07:05 welcome everyeone 14:07:19 #topic annoucements 14:07:28 not too much really 14:07:38 o/ 14:07:43 next week is allocated for midcycle 14:08:18 #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html 14:08:44 with that, we can move into topics 14:09:02 #topic Possibility of doing another os-brick preliminary Epoxy release 14:09:22 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/939776 14:09:38 hi jbernard, that's me 14:09:44 hi 14:10:40 sp-bmilanov: go ahead 14:10:48 just asking, although I saw how much effort is releasing a new version (just looking at how many repos and people are involved) 14:11:52 we have a few changes that are not yet merged, and without this change merged, managing those will be more difficult 14:11:58 a release is not really a big deal, especially during "in between" times for openstack as a whole 14:12:26 the release team tends to do releases on thursdays, i think 14:13:05 it sounds like a release need not be immediate, just that this patch make into the next one (prior to the final epoxy release) 14:13:09 is that right? 14:13:42 yes.. and definitely before https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847536 14:14:31 if rosmaita says so :) 14:14:51 ideally you would have a dependency chain that enforced this, but it's not a big deal, i think we can get this sorted 14:16:49 i think the key thing will be to make sure you have a release note on your os-brick patches, so when we do an early release, it's clear that the only change is to the storpool connector, so other people dont' need to upgrade 14:17:31 ahh, that's a good point 14:18:05 jbernard: rosmaita: thanks ... I will upload something up in a bit, probably won't get it right the first time but as a conversation starter 14:18:16 that works 14:18:18 s/something/a draft release note/ 14:18:48 thank you very much! :) 14:20:10 ok, sounds good 14:20:15 no problem 14:20:33 #topic open discussion 14:20:58 felipeafv: i belive you have an os-brick bug that needs attention? 14:21:13 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-brick/+bug/2091104 14:22:32 otherwise that's all for pre-planned topics, feel free to bring up any issues or concerns 14:22:48 or really good things too :) that's always an option 14:23:59 Hello team, I a new contributor for IBM cinder driver and we have developed a new feature for volumegroup and this is a base patch required for all the subsequent patches. I already have it reviewed by few people and would appreciate reviews from core members to proceed with merge. Thank you! https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/925450 14:25:01 vdhakad: welcome 14:25:23 ok, i see it's in the review list on the etherpad 14:29:16 ok, anything else? last call 14:30:14 thanks everyone, have a good rest of your week! 14:30:18 #endmeeting