14:10:34 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder 14:10:34 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Mar 26 14:10:34 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:10:34 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:10:34 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 14:10:50 <whoami-rajat_> Hi 14:10:53 <sfernand> hi 14:10:56 <msaravan> Hi 14:10:57 <akawai> o/ 14:10:59 <vdhakad> hi 14:11:11 <simondodsley> o/ 14:11:25 <jbernard> o/ 14:11:31 <jbernard> welcome everyone 14:11:46 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-meetings 14:12:04 <rosmaita> o/ 14:12:29 <jbernard> also 14:12:32 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-release-critical-bugs 14:12:45 <simondodsley> is there time to add to the critical bugs list? 14:13:34 <jbernard> simondodsley: whacha got? 14:13:54 <jbernard> if you have a critial bug, we should take a look 14:14:02 <jbernard> today we have an otherwise empty agenda 14:14:23 <jbernard> so I would like to process the rc-bug list as best as possible 14:14:28 <jbernard> this: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-release-critical-bugs 14:14:32 <simondodsley> I have 2 - one of which had to be reverted (yes, that one rosmaita...) and is a redo 14:14:38 <akawai> wait 14:14:45 <akawai> I'll leave Hitachi driver team this Apr. 14:14:54 <akawai> I would like to introduce you new members, hvlcchao1 and agalica. Please help them. 14:15:05 <akawai> Additionally, Hitachi CI is rebuilding in other site. so, it would not work for a while. 14:15:13 <akawai> Thank you guys! 14:15:36 <jbernard> akawai: thanks, sorry to see you go, and we wish you luck in next adventure 14:15:44 <rosmaita> thanks akawai and welcome hvlcchao1 and agalica 14:15:48 <akawai> thx! 14:16:16 <jbernard> simon is updating the doc 14:16:30 <jbernard> rosmaita: do you want to start at the top? 14:16:56 <rosmaita> ok 14:18:00 <rosmaita> i haven't reviewed 938265 yet, so will do that now 14:19:02 <jbernard> whoami-rajat_: on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/938265 14:19:26 <jbernard> whoami-rajat_: tobias raised an issue 14:20:37 <jbernard> i believe the issue raised not new, it is also the case with the current copy logic 14:21:15 <jbernard> tosky: ^ curious if you have input as well 14:21:49 <eharney> i'll leave a comment on 938265 14:22:00 <whoami-rajat_> Looking 14:22:31 <jbernard> thanks 14:23:28 <whoami-rajat_> We are reverting to the original logic, if the listed scenario is an issue, the optimisation that eharney added is the way to go i.e. use same format for image as volume 14:23:44 <whoami-rajat_> I am doing nothing new there, just adding the old logic back 14:24:54 <whoami-rajat_> Thanks eharney for your comment 14:27:28 <jbernard> that's what thought as well, this looks okay to me 14:29:27 <jbernard> done 14:30:00 <vdhakad> Hi rosmaita, I saw your note on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/925450 and I'm okay with holding off merge, I'd appreciate if you/other core reviewers could take a look at it and provide review comments if any. Thanks! 14:31:05 <rosmaita> vdhakad: thanks for understanding, we can work on that as soon as the final release candidate is out 14:33:47 <jbernard> im looking at the cgroup change from vigo, v2 support was added in cgroup-tools 2.x 14:37:17 <whoami-rajat_> I can take a look at patches that needs review 14:41:58 <jbernard> is anyone looking at alan's migration patch? 14:42:04 <jbernard> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/938827 14:45:02 <jbernard> simondodsley: what do we need to know about the two you've added? 14:46:07 <simondodsley> the first one is a redo of a patch that made it into 2025.1 but had to be reverted as another patch exposed a unit test bug. This is the redo. rosmaita had nightmares about the revert!!! 14:46:40 <rosmaita> we need a volunteer to cherry-pick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/938490 14:46:40 <rosmaita> to stable/2025.1 14:46:40 <rosmaita> you can do it in the gerrit web interface 14:46:40 <rosmaita> after you cherry pick, 14:46:40 <rosmaita> you will need to edit the commit message to add this line after the Change-Id: 14:46:42 <rosmaita> (cherry picked from commit d41586a115aabf01a756f6ee6ef58a813f87b546) 14:46:42 <simondodsley> both patches are critical for customers who are experiencing issues and one of them likes to run the latest release 14:48:02 <simondodsley> rosmaita - i can do that 14:48:13 <rosmaita> simondodsley: thanks! 14:49:07 <simondodsley> Done 14:49:18 <simondodsley> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/945614 14:55:15 <jbernard> simondodsley: you still have the CI issue, can you confirm those patches are being tested and passing? 14:55:35 <simondodsley> yes 14:55:53 <simondodsley> that CI issue is causing me real grief!! 14:56:39 <rosmaita> I did a cherry pick of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/945616 so eharney and jbernard can +2 the backport after the master patch merges 14:57:48 <rosmaita> eharney or simondodsley: can you do the cherry-pick of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/916408 so jbernard and i can +2 it 14:58:10 <eharney> will do that now 14:58:22 <rosmaita> thanks 15:01:54 <hemna> mep 15:01:59 <jbernard> hemna: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-epoxy-release-critical-bugs 15:02:16 <hemna> need reviews? 15:02:17 <jbernard> most are in good shape, the one exception is alan's migration patch 15:02:33 <jbernard> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/938827 15:02:59 <jbernard> hemna: thanks! 15:03:13 <hemna> ok I'll poke at it 15:08:05 <rosmaita> simondodsley: jbernard: i have a reservation about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/945062 , see what you think 15:08:16 <rosmaita> eharney: you too ^^ 15:09:44 <eharney> i submitted a follow-up patch that fixes that, it's in the relation chain on that patch 15:11:52 <rosmaita> cool, problem solved 15:19:27 <jbernard> simondodsley: you can backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/945062 15:30:07 <jbernard> im going to end the recorded meeting here, im not sure if this channel is used for other teams. And we can resume in our normal irc channel. thank you to everyone who participated, much appreciated 15:30:11 <jbernard> #endmeeting