14:08:18 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder 14:08:18 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed May 21 14:08:18 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:08:18 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:08:18 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' 14:08:31 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-flamingo-meetings 14:08:36 <jbernard> #topic roll call 14:08:37 <whoami-rajat> hi 14:08:41 <jbernard> o/ 14:08:48 <hvlcchao1> hi 14:08:51 <gireesh> hi 14:08:53 <simondodsley> o/ 14:08:55 <rosmaita> o/ 14:09:04 <tosky> o/ 14:09:18 <Sai> o/ 14:09:49 <jbernard> we do not have any pre-planned content for today's meeting, so this may be a short one 14:09:57 <jbernard> welcome everyone 14:10:30 <jbernard> #topic open discussion 14:11:58 <jbernard> if anyone is looking for things that need attention, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-flamingo-reviews 14:12:15 <jbernard> and of course the reviews submitted that haven't been explicitly added to the list 14:14:51 <rosmaita> if tosky has some time, we can talk about the nfs CI job 14:14:59 <rosmaita> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965 14:19:21 <tosky> sure 14:19:56 <tosky> I simply rebased the review to not have it stale, but I need to change it to run at least the slow tests separately 14:20:05 <rosmaita> ok, that is what i was going to ask 14:20:09 <tosky> a related problem is none of the cinder-tempest-plugin test is marked as slow 14:20:24 <rosmaita> yes, i was going to do the marking on those 14:20:26 <tosky> so I could simply use concurrency 1 or 2 just for those, together with the slow ones from tempest 14:20:35 <tosky> oh, nice to hear (the marking) 14:21:02 <rosmaita> eharney suggested we should use the label 'enhanced' instead of 'slow' for cinder-tempest-plugin 14:21:21 <rosmaita> what do you think of that? 14:21:23 <tosky> uhm, but the standard is "slow" 14:21:34 <eharney> yeah i wasn't sure if marking tests slow was going to result in some important tests not being run when they should be 14:21:37 <tosky> it is just to say that it takes more time than a few seconds, that would be a fast test 14:21:39 <eharney> since some jobs skip those i think? 14:22:02 <tosky> yes, some jobs skip them, but I think we run them right now - and if we don't, we should fix that 14:22:16 <rosmaita> i think we do run them all right now 14:22:43 <rosmaita> ok, i will put up a patch with the slow label 14:23:10 <rosmaita> and we can merge that independently of whether anything is actually consuming the label, right? 14:23:19 <tosky> yes, correct 14:23:46 <rosmaita> ok, i'll work from the list here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965/15#message-dea6ee763866c4b4b6dca714b463b2e6e945449c 14:24:22 <rosmaita> i'll double-check, but i think the non-cinder-tempest-plugin tests on that patch already have the label 14:24:47 <rosmaita> at least the first one (21 failures/60 runs) does 14:27:59 <rosmaita> ok, looks like we have a way forward on getting this job more stable and also having more coverage 14:28:08 <rosmaita> thanks, tosky! 14:29:01 <tosky> :) 14:31:05 <jbernard> anyone have anything else? 14:32:36 <jbernard> alright, thank you everyone 14:32:41 <jbernard> #endmeeting