14:06:20 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder
14:06:20 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Oct  8 14:06:20 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:06:20 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:06:20 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
14:06:33 <jbernard> courtesy ping: jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley  zaubea nileshthathagar flelain
14:06:51 <jbernard> note: meeting in #openstack-cinder (here)
14:06:57 <jbernard> #topic roll call
14:06:59 <jbernard> o/
14:07:45 <wizardbit> o/
14:08:18 <sfernand> hi
14:09:12 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-meetings
14:09:41 <rosmaita> o/
14:10:00 <jbernard> #topic annoucements
14:10:14 <jbernard> first, welcome to the G release cycle
14:10:20 <agalica> o/
14:10:27 <jbernard> the PTG is coming in a few weeks
14:10:37 <jbernard> specifically teh week of October 27
14:10:43 <opendevreview> Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: DNM: tempest-full plus cinder-tempest-plugin  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/949742
14:10:54 <jbernard> we will likely meet on Tuesday
14:10:59 <jbernard> we have a planning etherpad here
14:11:05 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-cinder-planning
14:11:25 <jbernard> i will be working to populate that this week
14:11:35 <jbernard> please add topics there so that I can plan and schedule time
14:12:53 <jbernard> #topic netapp clone across pools support
14:12:55 <jbernard> rosmaita: ^
14:14:37 <rosmaita> hello
14:15:02 <rosmaita> just need someone from NetApp to answer my question on the patch
14:15:24 <rosmaita> hopefully there is someone here today
14:15:58 <Anoop_Shukla> Hello. I am here
14:16:08 <rosmaita> great!
14:16:24 <rosmaita> please take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388
14:17:05 <Anoop_Shukla> yep, we are testing this patch on our side. once we have tested the cross pool caching works, we will respond
14:17:22 <rosmaita> thanks, just wanted to make sure you are aware
14:19:13 <rosmaita> ok, that's all from me
14:19:39 <jbernard> thanks brian
14:19:53 <jbernard> #topic driver ci
14:20:17 <jbernard> im very much hoping we can get 3rd party ci reporting sorted this cycle
14:20:24 <Anoop_Shukla> Have a patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/956221. This needs +2 and is ready for submission once received. Can anyone from core help with this patch?
14:21:25 <jbernard> im happy to use a time slot at the PTG to allow collaboration on CI setups, tips, etc
14:21:50 <simondodsley> definately need that
14:21:54 <jbernard> ok
14:23:03 <jbernard> i don't want to have CI exceptions become the majority, and we are definately trending in that direction
14:23:46 <jbernard> so maybe we can share information and help everyone get this sorted at the PTG
14:23:50 <jayaanand> hi
14:23:54 <simondodsley> we do need some concensus on what should be reported and how/where
14:24:04 <jbernard> if you have a working setup and you have time to document or discuss at the PTG, that would be very helpful
14:24:20 <simondodsley> working is a variable term :D
14:24:25 <jbernard> true
14:24:42 <simondodsley> did the the novnc issue get fixed as that was causing all sorts of havoc in the CIs
14:25:01 <jbernard> not sure, that would be a good bullet on the planning etherpad
14:28:16 <agalica> When is the PCG meeting?  We might find that CI information useful as well
14:28:28 <agalica> Oh, Oct 27
14:28:34 <agalica> week
14:28:34 <jbernard> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-cinder-planning
14:28:40 <jbernard> see the header there
14:29:00 <agalica> Super, thank you.
14:29:07 <jbernard> it is the entire week for everyone, but each project will define a schedule what makes sense for them
14:29:13 <agalica> ok, thank you
14:30:00 <jbernard> it mostly depends on the content of the planning etherpad, i will schedule time to cover those topics and try maximize our time together
14:30:48 <jbernard> historically, we meet on tuesday (and possibly wednesday depending on demand)
14:31:20 <jbernard> we have a cross-project with ironic that i need to coordinate, ill have a concrete schedule by next meeting
14:34:44 <wizardbit> May I bring up a patch now?
14:34:44 <jbernard> that is all that I have for annoucments and topics
14:35:10 <agalica> is there a new etherpad for Gazpacho reviews?
14:35:14 <simondodsley> yes - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-reviews
14:35:31 <agalica> haha, guess you just created it
14:35:34 <jbernard> wizardbit, agalica you can put requests there ^
14:35:45 <jayaanand> We have multiple NetApp back porting patches. Can we bring to your attenction
14:36:19 <simondodsley> there are manu backport patches out there waiting for stable cores to review
14:36:38 <jayaanand> These are critical for ROSHO certification
14:36:41 <agalica> We are looking for reviews here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344  We are willing to review other patches too
14:36:57 <jbernard> im looking here: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/cinder+branch:stable/2025.2
14:37:03 <agalica> We also need this for critical backporting
14:37:16 <jbernard> simondodsley: is there a better filter i should be using?
14:37:24 <simondodsley> look at 2025.1...
14:37:41 <jbernard> ahh, there we go
14:38:07 <jayaanand> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961437 and review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961436
14:38:10 <jbernard> rosmaita: can i filter across multiple branches? what is the query string (do you know?)
14:38:18 <simondodsley> there are a lot for 2024.2 as well, which will only increase when the 2025.1 patches are merged
14:40:09 <simondodsley> 15 open for 2025.1 and 10 for 2024.2
14:41:59 <rosmaita> i think maybe we have a dashboard you can use
14:42:12 <agalica> @simondodsley do you still need a reviewer for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958569 ?
14:42:28 <rosmaita> http://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained
14:42:31 <simondodsley> I need core reviewers
14:42:35 <agalica> ok, thanks
14:42:45 <wizardbit> I copied the patch from 2025.2 over to 2026.1. Is it fine to have it in both docs?
14:42:47 <agalica> @wizardbit need a regular reviewer for your patch?
14:43:05 <simondodsley> nice @rosmaita
14:43:17 <rosmaita> :D
14:43:30 <wizardbit> @agalica I believe we just need a code review
14:44:00 <agalica> I can do that for you.  It would be appreciated if you could look at our patch too, but I will review yours regardless
14:44:02 <rosmaita> just noticed that it's missing Flamingo
14:44:50 <simondodsley> can you get it to ignore the WIPs as well
14:44:54 <wizardbit> Thank you @agalica!
14:45:21 <agalica> @wizardbit are you sure you don't need a core reviewer for +2 here?  I see you have two +1s for reviews
14:46:05 <rosmaita> simondodsley: not sure, got an example?
14:46:28 <simondodsley> there are many in Caracal that are status:WIP
14:46:49 <simondodsley> they all look like storpool backports.
14:47:03 <simondodsley> Not sure how a backport can be WIP
14:47:05 <wizardbit> @agalica Sorry I'm not familiar with the process. I'm here on behalf of Erlon. I think you're right, we just need a core reviewer
14:47:06 <rosmaita> oh, i see
14:47:24 <wizardbit> Not sure if more reviews would help
14:47:33 <simondodsley> @wizardbit - you need two cire reviewers and a workflow
14:47:42 <agalica> ok, @wizardbit.  I'm somewhat new as well and am not a core reviewer.  I am pretty sure that's waht you need.  If Erlon can review our patch it would be highly appreciated, but I don't think we can review yours as we don't have a core reviewer :(
14:48:11 <simondodsley> anyone can review anything. to merge it needs core reviewers
14:48:48 <simondodsley> if you review someone elses patch you are more likely to get your patches reviewed. it's a complimentary thing
14:49:20 <agalica> Yeah simon, that's what I'm trying to do.  But there's only 3 patches listed there
14:49:27 <agalica> you need core and so does he
14:49:37 <agalica> are there other patches we can review?  The problem isn't lack of desire :)
14:49:55 <simondodsley> we are at the start of a cycle - so there are very few patches currently.
14:50:05 <wizardbit> We just need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/955379 to at least be accepted  (not necessarily merged) by the core reviewers, so that we can put it into our packages and expect this to be in a future release
14:51:56 <jbernard> ok, that's all i have; anything else?
14:52:06 <simondodsley> you did have one +2 for this but your latest upload (fixing the commit) lost that. You have to start again with the cores
14:52:37 <simondodsley> Also you should get @whoamirajat to clarify his previous -1
14:52:39 <jbernard> rajat should circle back for that
14:52:58 <jbernard> other cores will wait for rajat to confirm his concerns have been addressed
14:53:39 <agalica> Ok.  What's the best path forward to alert Rajat?  Add him to the patch?  Reply int he now-abandoned patch?
14:53:59 <jbernard> he's in IST timezone,
14:54:16 <jbernard> because he reviewed it once, he's in the CC, so a comment on the patch should reach his inbox
14:54:21 <agalica> ok, thank you
14:55:38 <jbernard> no problem
14:55:41 <jbernard> ok, last call
14:56:01 <jbernard> thanks everyone
14:56:04 <jbernard> #endmeeting