14:03:22 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder
14:03:22 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Oct 15 14:03:22 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:22 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:22 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
14:03:37 <jbernard> courtesy reminder: jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley  zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit
14:03:44 <jbernard> #topic roll call
14:03:51 <rosmaita> o/
14:03:53 <jbernard> o/
14:03:53 <sfernand> hi
14:03:54 <hemna> doink
14:03:56 <yuval> 0/
14:04:00 <raineszm> o/
14:04:01 <hvlcchao1> hi
14:04:01 * jungleboyj lurks
14:04:02 <jbernard> notes and agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-meetings
14:04:13 <gireesh> o/
14:04:26 <wizardbit> o/
14:06:57 <jbernard> welcome everyone
14:07:10 <jbernard> short agenda today,
14:07:38 <jbernard> quick ptg planning update, im hoping to have a firm-ish schedule posted soon
14:08:00 <jbernard> it's likely going to be tues and wed
14:08:16 <jbernard> nova cross-project on wednesday, ironic still to schedule, and possibly glance
14:08:31 <rosmaita> we will need one with glance
14:08:44 <jbernard> k, ill reach out to cyril for that
14:09:22 <jbernard> #topic stable caracal (rosmaita)
14:09:31 <rosmaita> hello
14:09:45 <rosmaita> stable/2024.1 goes to 'unmaintained' mode at the end of next week
14:10:14 <rosmaita> there are some merged but unreleased patches, so we should do a final caracal release first
14:10:26 <jbernard> yes
14:10:32 <rosmaita> we also have some open reviews, that you can see in the dashboard:
14:11:47 <rosmaita> http://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained
14:11:57 <rosmaita> caracal is at the bottom
14:12:43 <rosmaita> so we have those that need review, and then if there are other patches that haven't merged to more recent branches, those would have to merge and be proposed
14:13:00 <hemna> we are working on upgrading to epoxy, currently on antelope
14:13:07 <rosmaita> so probably not, unless someone has an overwhelming interest in caracal?
14:15:19 <simondodsley> You should ask the guys at canonical
14:15:44 <rosmaita> ok, so to summarize: we do need to do a release from stable/2024.1 before next friday, if there are particular patches you'd like to see in there, you need to let us know right away
14:16:17 <rosmaita> for instance, this one seems innocuous enough, but in needs to merge to D and E first: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963701
14:17:11 <agalica> o/
14:17:18 <wizardbit> o/
14:17:28 <jbernard> rosmaita: i can work on that one
14:17:42 <jbernard> rosmaita: are there others that we know we want?
14:18:00 <VolodymyrBoiko[m]> o/
14:18:14 <hemna> are you trying to get that netapp driver patch in ?
14:18:30 <jbernard> hemna: which one?
14:18:34 <rosmaita> no, there's nothing open for os-brick, there is one un released patch, so we will release os-brick too
14:18:53 <hemna> ok
14:18:57 <hemna> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388
14:19:22 <erlon> \o
14:19:26 <rosmaita> actually, i take that back, there are no brick commits to stable/2024.1 since the 6.7.3 tag
14:19:47 <agalica> Is this the open section of the meeting? (sorry, I was in the openstack-alt channel)
14:20:15 <rosmaita> hemna: i am still waiting on a response from NetApp on that one
14:20:29 <rosmaita> maybe i need to -1 instead of +1
14:20:51 <rosmaita> there's no problem i see with the patch itself, just depends on how the backend works
14:21:40 <rosmaita> i mentioned it last week, i thought someone from netapp was going to take a look
14:22:23 <rosmaita> at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388 to be completely specific
14:22:28 <hemna> ok.  are the netapp guys still around?
14:23:24 <rosmaita> there's usually a few here
14:23:47 <jbernard> jayaanand: ^ are you here?
14:24:20 <jbernard> gireesh: ^
14:25:47 <jbernard> while we wait,
14:26:01 <jbernard> we have a new driver (vast) waiting on core reviews: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/939005
14:26:20 <hemna> I can take a look
14:26:26 <jbernard> if any cores could commit some time to looking at that, it would be nice to pull that in
14:26:35 <jbernard> hemna: thanks
14:26:48 <hemna> I presume they have CI ?
14:27:09 <jbernard> VolodymyrBoiko[m] is the author, and i believe CI is reporting on the patch
14:27:25 <rosmaita> yes, CI is reporting
14:27:27 <VolodymyrBoiko[m]> Yes we have (VASTData CI)
14:27:50 <rosmaita> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/939005/44#message-94be7c6d6a062238857635b645ffa35119ac0ea3
14:27:53 <hemna> ok great.
14:28:14 <gireesh> yes jbernard, tell me
14:28:31 <rosmaita> jbernard: i wonder if we should use the thursday and friday PTG slots for driver reviews?
14:28:49 <jbernard> gireesh: see rosmaita's above query about the netapp patch
14:28:51 <hemna> anyone have the url to the PTG ?
14:29:26 <jbernard> hemna: our planning etherpad, the official etherpad, or the ptg site in general?
14:29:36 <rosmaita> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-cinder-planning
14:29:41 <hemna> ty
14:29:49 <rosmaita> planning ^^ has links to the other stuff (i think)
14:30:08 <jbernard> gireesh: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388
14:30:19 <gireesh> Regarding patch, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388, @rosmaita, jayaanand is working on this, he will get back to you on this
14:30:36 <gireesh> I will also review this patch
14:30:39 <rosmaita> gireesh: thank you
14:30:58 <rosmaita> gireesh: it would help to leave a comment on the patch saying that you'll be back with more info
14:31:42 <rosmaita> hemna: sounds like that patch may be delayed a bit, don't see it making it to caracal for sure
14:32:08 <jbernard> rosmaita: re thu and fri for reviews, sounds good
14:32:18 <hemna> ok thanks for the update
14:32:43 <rosmaita> cool, it's good to have the time blocked off so people can tell their managers they are committed to upstream work for that time
14:32:53 <rosmaita> and hopefully we can get a bunch of driver reviews done
14:33:06 <jbernard> i agree, will do
14:35:32 <agalica> Are we in the open section of the meeting, or is that still upcoming?
14:35:55 <jbernard> i think we are now, unless there is anything else from brian
14:36:09 <jbernard> #topic open discussion
14:36:16 <agalica> Thank you
14:36:30 <rosmaita> nothing more from me!
14:36:31 <agalica> We are still waiting on Rajat (or anyone) to review/reply to our patch here:  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344 - it addresses Rajat's concerns from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/959901 .  Would it be possible to get a different core to look at it? We need to do a back port on this patch
14:36:54 <erlon> jbernard: put me in the line too
14:37:14 <agalica> We have our CI running with logs on the patch, etc.  But we haven't gotten a reply since the 10th of last month; we now have produced a new patch and still no replies
14:37:34 <agalica> erlon: do you need non-core reviews?  I can review your code if so
14:37:57 <gireesh> @rosmaita, we are testing the patch, parallelly we will start the review
14:38:07 <wizardbit> Same, we have been waiting on Rajat since Aug 13th for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/955379
14:38:21 <erlon> I actually need, to get a hold on rajat to discuss something but it's been hard to find him around
14:38:56 <rosmaita> gireesh: thanks!
14:39:53 <jbernard> agalica: i msg'd rajat internally (he should be asleep right now though), if there is no movement soon I can take a look
14:40:09 <agalica> jbernard: thank you very much
14:40:11 <gireesh> I have couple of patches, can some review those also, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961525 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/960444
14:40:27 <erlon> anyone here from the eu timezone has come across him?
14:40:32 <gireesh> one is backporting to Epoxy release
14:40:41 <agalica> gireesh: my team and I will review both.  Would you be willing to review our patch as well?  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344
14:41:28 <gireesh> sure @galica
14:41:37 <raineszm> To jump on the pile: I'm trying to move https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/658283 forward and was wondering when and where to best discuss how to proceed.
14:41:42 <rosmaita> gireesh: what is the status of the ASAr2 CI ?
14:42:02 <agalica> We also have these patcehs for review, but less important: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/869991 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/850830
14:42:40 <agalica> raineszm: We are not core reviewers, but we will review your patch later today as well
14:42:51 <agalica> I see you have no reviews
14:43:16 <agalica> gireesh: we will review later today
14:43:27 <gireesh> We still not added the ASAr2 hardware in our CI, that will take some more time, but we have run the CI with ONTAP-9 for this path to make sure there is no regression
14:43:42 <raineszm> agalica: ty.
14:43:49 <jbernard> as an aside, anyone can become a core reviewer if they can be consistent over a period of time and are verbose about their assesment (so other reviewers can follow)
14:44:26 <jbernard> i look at the stats from time to time, if there is a compelling case, im happy to make one
14:44:29 <gireesh> Thanks agalica, please review, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961525 only
14:44:40 <agalica> ok, will do gireesh
14:45:17 <agalica> raineszm: not a requirement for us to review, but would appreciate if you could review ours as well: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344
14:45:30 <raineszm> agalica: happy to take a look
14:46:09 <wizardbit> @jbernard did you msg Rajat for os-brick/+/955379 as well?
14:48:17 <agalica> rainszm: awesome, thank you! :)
14:49:09 <jbernard> wizardbit: yes, i directed him to the meeting etherpad, so just make sure it's there and he should see it
14:49:38 <rosmaita> raineszm: looks like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/658283 would be a good candidate for discussion at the ptg, looks like there was disagreement on the design, but i don't think it was changed?
14:50:47 <erlon> @jbernard do you know if he usually joins the channel in his timezone? I never got to cross with him. I have a couple hours of overlap
14:51:41 <rosmaita> raineszm: not saying you have to change the design, but you could explain why you are satisfied with what you have
14:51:45 <jbernard> erlon: im not sure, but i will mention it to him next time i get a chance, which should be tomorrow morning
14:52:05 <erlon> great thanks
14:52:28 <jbernard> erlon: he's in IST tz
14:52:40 <raineszm> rosmaita: right. My concern was mostly about mixing a new feature implementation (the block size for the RBD driver) with a refactor (unifying the block size configuration in the driver class).
14:52:45 <rosmaita> erlon: Rajat is in UTC+5:30 time zone
14:52:59 <erlon> yeah, Im in amer/eu, we get 2h or so of overlap
14:53:37 <opendevreview> Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: zuul: run cinder-tempest-plugin tests too  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965
14:53:40 <raineszm> rosmaita: Open to discussion, about it. Not sure if the review, irc, or the associated launchpad bug is the best venue.
14:54:21 <rosmaita> raineszm: i think the PTG for sure, and even on the agenda for the cinder weekly meeting so we can discuss
14:55:22 <rosmaita> looks like it was eharney and jbernard who were disagreeing, jon is always here for the meetings, and you can ping eric to make sure he knows its on the agenda (he has a meeting conflict usually, i think)
14:56:05 <raineszm> sorry, what's the etiquette for adding things to the agenda?
14:56:15 <rosmaita> just add them!
14:56:33 <raineszm> will do! ty.
14:56:37 <rosmaita> (you have satisfied the etiquette just by asking!)
14:57:22 <agalica> friendly bunch!
14:59:24 <jbernard> yes, in case it's not clear, the eherpad is open to everyone for additions and edits
15:00:27 <jbernard> ok, we're at time, anything else?
15:01:19 <agalica> one quick question
15:01:24 <jbernard> quick :)
15:01:27 <agalica> is there a resource that shows which meeting room this meeting occurs in?
15:01:34 <agalica> I probably just missed it / blind
15:01:48 <agalica> it was always openstack-meeting-alt, and the last couple times it moved around a bit
15:01:50 <jbernard> i put it at the top of the etherpad, but there might be something else i need to update
15:02:01 <agalica> gotcha, I probably glazed right over it
15:02:03 <agalica> thanks
15:02:05 <jbernard> i moved it to make things simplier (just one channel to join/watch)
15:02:12 <agalica> yah, makes sense
15:02:52 <jbernard> ok, thank you everyone!
15:02:54 <jbernard> #endmeeting