14:08:53 <jbernard> #startmeeting cinder
14:08:53 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Nov 12 14:08:53 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:08:53 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:08:53 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
14:08:59 <jbernard> #topic roll call
14:09:29 <nileshthathagar_> hi
14:09:32 <sfernand> hi
14:09:42 <Luzi> o/
14:09:43 <jbernard> the winter time change is hard for me, i have two kids that get on the bus right at 9 so it takes me a few minutes to get to my workstation
14:10:07 <yuval> \0
14:10:13 <jbernard> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-meetings
14:10:16 <jungleboyj> o/
14:10:38 <rosmaita> o/
14:10:59 <jbernard> jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley  zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit agalica: courtesy ping
14:11:00 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Adding support for PBHA volumegroup update  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/950860
14:11:47 <jbernard> #topic annoucements
14:11:54 <jbernard> ptg summary is up
14:12:00 <jbernard> #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/GI5ZT4YWTSHTF4ZCNPSRH6BJKOSCRVXM/
14:12:14 <jbernard> i will create the wiki page today
14:12:26 <jbernard> big thanks to jungleboyj for uploading the recordings
14:12:37 <jungleboyj> :-)  No problem.
14:12:48 <jbernard> the wiki will have the mailing list summary, along with links to the recordings for future reference
14:14:10 <jbernard> a quick note about a few unsupported dell drivers,
14:14:34 <jbernard> in our review session last friday, we found a few patches for dell drivers that have been marked as unsuppored
14:14:45 <jbernard> #link https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/202713dd9356a2050dc350b9c66e5ae082ff8c6a
14:15:01 <jbernard> unless there is a particular objection, these drivers can be removed
14:15:36 <nileshthathagar_> agree +1
14:16:35 <jbernard> in review news, we've been making some progress on the current queue
14:16:51 <jbernard> many of the stephenfin openapi patches have landed,
14:17:04 <jbernard> there are still a few to go, but that is finally moving forward
14:17:49 <jbernard> the IBM patches have gotten some traction, a few folks have been looking at those and hopefully we can get them into shape soon
14:18:09 <harsh> :)
14:18:12 <jbernard> and yes, the vast driver is being looked at as well
14:18:15 <jbernard> VolodymyrBoiko[m]: ^ :)
14:18:32 <VolodymyrBoiko[m]> jbernard: thank you
14:19:05 <jbernard> i think, given our capacity, reviews are moving forward pretty well, still a lot to do but we've made progress in the last weeks
14:20:43 <jbernard> #topic gerrit resolved default
14:20:48 <gireesh> can some one from core reviewer can look into this path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/964191
14:21:14 <gireesh> *patch
14:21:30 <jbernard> gireesh: we have an etherpad for this https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-reviews and the open discussion section of the meeting as well
14:21:45 <gireesh> sure
14:21:54 <jbernard> anthony at hitachi added this topic (gerrit resolved default)
14:22:14 <jbernard> i think he may still be asleep
14:23:33 <rosmaita> i added some followup notes on that
14:23:40 <jbernard> reading now too
14:23:42 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Support PBHA properties reporting  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/952422
14:23:43 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Support PBHA group-snapshot and restore  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/952432
14:23:43 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Adding policing for PBHA partition  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958138
14:23:44 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Support location affinity to hosts in PBHA partition.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963620
14:23:44 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf driver] Adding support for PBHA volume manage operation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/962244
14:23:45 <jbernard> #link https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2025-11-07.log.html
14:24:08 <jbernard> i think the takeaway is,
14:24:18 <opendevreview> Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf Driver] Add basic support for Policy-Based Replication (PBR)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/965442
14:24:46 <jbernard> keep in mind when you're responding to a review to only mark things resolved if that is the case, and that the default can overwrite a previous reviewers concern
14:25:20 <jbernard> this can cause delays in teh review process if a reviewer is waiting for a change, but the author has clobbered the comment and isn't aware that there is more to be done
14:25:53 <jbernard> rosmaita: ^ is this a correct assesement?
14:26:03 <jbernard> i think you've looked at this closer than I
14:26:34 <rosmaita> i think the takeaway is to always look at all the comments on your patch, whether they are marked as "Resolved" or not
14:26:47 <rosmaita> unless you have specifically marked it as "Resolved" yourself
14:28:10 <jbernard> and also note that a general response will default to mark them all as resolved
14:28:36 <jbernard> so make sure that's okay so that something doesn't fall through the cracks
14:29:27 <jbernard> #topic image encryption
14:29:29 <jbernard> Luzi: ^
14:29:43 <jbernard> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/964777
14:29:57 <Luzi> yeah, i updated the spec with the new cases for the container-format and disk_format
14:30:23 <Luzi> these are only small updates, so it would be nice, if we could start implementing soon
14:30:38 <jbernard> ok, we will take a pass through the specs soon
14:30:48 <Luzi> thank you
14:31:44 <jbernard> #topic NFS online volume extend
14:31:47 <jbernard> kgube: ^
14:32:01 <kgube> Hi
14:32:20 <jayaanand> hi
14:32:29 <kgube> Yeah, we talked about this at the cross-team session with nova at the PTG
14:32:57 <jbernard> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/949509
14:33:05 <kgube> It was mostly input from Nova and i'm currently rewriting the specs accordingly
14:33:37 <jbernard> i remember dansmith having some concerns during this discussion
14:34:23 <kgube> I believe Rajat also mentioned that there were concerns from Cinder but we did not have time to discuss them there
14:35:06 <jbernard> the most likely case is that we work through the cinder-specific concerns on the spec, once it is finalized
14:35:28 <kgube> alright, that is fine with me
14:36:18 <jbernard> #topic open discussion
14:36:31 <jbernard> reminder we have an etherpad for review requests: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-reviews
14:37:47 <seunghunlee> I tried to revive the rbd feature that supports creating flatten volume from image. I added the patch link to the etherpad. Any reviews would be appreciated.
14:39:41 <jbernard> ok
14:40:13 <seunghunlee> Thanks
14:41:22 <nimeshdesai> Added IBM feature and fixes patches in the etherpad. These are quite important for our customers.
14:42:03 <jbernard> nimeshdesai: ok, im still working from  this etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-patches-flamingo too
14:42:48 <nimeshdesai> thank you jbernard
14:48:26 <jbernard> ok, last call
14:49:08 <jbernard> thank you everyone
14:49:10 <jbernard> #endmeeting