15:14:37 <enriquetaso> #startmeeting cinder_bs
15:14:38 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May 26 15:14:37 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is enriquetaso. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:14:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:14:41 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder_bs'
15:15:04 <enriquetaso> #topic bug_1: "Can't migrate plain encrypted volume - keymanager error"
15:15:14 <enriquetaso> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1929128
15:15:16 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1929128 in Cinder "can't migrate plain encrypted volume - keymanager error" [High,New]
15:15:20 <enriquetaso> Summary: I was trying to test the volume migrate functionality with a cinder lvm backend from one to another host together with barbican for encryption activated. *Luks is not supported for migration so the setting used was plain* -> I think this last part is not accurate.
15:15:20 <enriquetaso> My first thought was that this was related to the know header issue but then I saw in the logs 'Key manager error: Forbidden: Secret retrieval attempt not allowed - please review your user/project privileges'
15:15:20 <enriquetaso> ^ looks like a credentials problem. However, in comment #4 the reporter wrote "this works fine for unencrypted drives. but fails for encrypted ones." So this time shows a completely different error msg than I usually see.
15:17:40 <enriquetaso> #topic bug_2: "Volume uuid of deleted volume is visible in volume list while restoring volume backup in horizon"
15:17:44 <enriquetaso> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1928953
15:17:45 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1928953 in Cinder "Volume uuid of deleted volume is visible in volume list while restoring volume backup in horizon." [High,New]
15:18:08 <enriquetaso> I need help to understand the case scenario that the reporter is facing. As I understand, the reported bug looks like after deleting a volume,  Horizon keeps showing the volume as available state instead of deleting status. The reporter tries to restore a backup using the volume UUID and it works.
15:18:09 <enriquetaso> As far as I see it, if the user is using 'cinder backup-restore --volume uuid' there's a problem. What does the team think?
15:19:52 <enriquetaso> #action(enriquetaso) looks like horizon problem
15:20:27 <enriquetaso> #topic  bug_3: "Create x Update Volume Metadata in Cinder Backend"
15:20:28 <enriquetaso> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1929606
15:20:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1929606 in Cinder "Create x Update Volume Metadata in Cinder Backend" [Medium,New]
15:20:38 <enriquetaso> Summary: Looks like there are bugs filled regarding RBAC implementation but this implementation hasn't finished yet: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/cinder+intopic:RBAC
15:22:18 <enriquetaso> #action(enriquetaso): looks like a real bug, needs to be confirmed.
15:22:49 <enriquetaso> #topic Open Discussion
15:23:36 <eharney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1929678
15:23:38 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1929678 in Cinder "attachment_create api leaks reserved attachments" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Felix Huettner (felix.huettner)
15:23:54 <enriquetaso> #action(enriquetaso) regarding bug_1: policy configure correctly - probably not a cinder bug
15:24:25 <enriquetaso> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1929678
15:27:47 <whoami-rajat_> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/cinder/volume/manager.py#L4746
15:29:39 <enriquetaso> #action(enriquetaso): what kind of side effect the fix could have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/793136
15:31:59 <enriquetaso> #endmeeting