15:01:38 #startmeeting cinder_bs 15:01:38 Meeting started Wed Aug 18 15:01:38 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is enriquetaso. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:38 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder_bs' 15:01:46 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bug-squad-meeting 15:01:55 Hello, welcome to the bug meeting, we have a bunch of bugs for this week. Full list of bugs: 15:01:55 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024220.html 15:02:07 The way I used to request the new bugs to Launchpad is failing or something so I lost track of most of the new reported bugs. For this week's report I manually checked the launchpad. If anyone knows how to filter dates on Launchpad that actually works please let me know. 15:02:32 OK.. the first two bugs are High importance bugs and that's why I've mentioned them here but both have patches proposed to master. 15:03:02 #topic bug_1 "Original volume size is lost when uploading a volume to a qcow2 image" 15:03:07 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1939972 15:03:13 Summary: The virtual size of the image(2GB) doesn't fit in a volume size(1GB), but this error is not exposed to users. This makes it difficult to let users know the actual cause of the error. 15:03:13 enriquetaso, i think you can Order by: Date last updated 15:03:51 whoami-rajat, yep, i need to double check again I guess, because it wasnt working for me today 15:04:02 ok 15:04:16 Also, regarding the bug_1 Rajat proposed a new user message that will notify users regarding any async failure with the given operation. In addition, the reporter wrote that cinder already has a mechanism to validate a given volume size based on the min_disk property of a source image. 15:05:02 yeah so i will be working on the user message part for this bug (as I've a series of patches for user-messages and can add this in one of them) 15:05:31 whoami-rajat++ 15:05:32 thanks 15:05:36 moving on.. 15:05:39 i guess cinder could set virtual_size for glance, and/or min_disk when we upload 15:06:12 The patch proposed upstream uses min_disk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/804584 15:06:16 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/804584 15:06:21 min_disk would be better, we check that 15:06:28 thanks for the link 15:07:15 that sounds like a good solution 15:07:17 glance has code inplace to set virtual_size after creating an image, maybe they can add that to this flow as well 15:08:47 do you mind doing that whoami-rajat ? I'm not sure what should glance do 15:09:25 OK, i can check that later, moving on.. 15:09:31 #topic bug_2 " Nova thinks deleted volume is still attached" 15:09:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1937084 15:09:43 Summary: There are cases where a cinder volume no longer exists yet nova still thinks it is attached to an instance and we cannot detach it anymore. This has been observed when running cinder-csi, where it makes a volume delete request as soon as the volume status says it's available. 15:10:07 Fix proposed to branch: master 15:10:08 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/801913 15:10:46 Please review when you have time, nothing else to add there from my side and I think gorka is on holiday 15:11:43 and it's #4 in a series of patches! 15:11:45 the whole series of 4 patches is stuck on a merge conflict on the first patch that needs resolution 15:12:41 Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/778534 15:12:43 oh true, sorry. forgot to mention that 15:12:59 i think eric just resolved the conflict 15:13:01 rebased ^ 15:13:10 eharney++ 15:13:20 Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Delete attachment on remove_export failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/801912 15:13:38 Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Expose volume_attachments in Volume OVO https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/779576 15:13:50 #topic bug_3 " Create instance from volume fails on reschedule " 15:13:56 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1936474 15:14:01 whoami-rajat sorry for bothering you here but I think it's easier, are you facing this problem with rbd for both glance and cinder or it's something different? 15:14:36 enriquetaso, it's backend independent, I've also replied on the bug 15:14:49 thanks! 15:14:58 Last 2 bugs: 15:15:07 should be moved back to "in progress" from "incomplete" 15:15:30 done 15:15:39 #topic bug_4 "Removing a volume in wrong state doesn't report its state" 15:15:47 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1940437 15:15:52 Summary: When trying to remove a volume in a wrong state, the error message says about what's the states should be for the volume to be removable; however we don't report its current state. It would be useful for operators to know about it. 15:16:00 I thought that we already covered this somewhere, but it looks like not. Feel free to reproduce this and review Emilien's patch. 15:16:18 i think the reason we don't do this is because the logged status could be wrong due to race conditions 15:16:22 i remember looking at it a while back 15:17:00 to do it completely accurately you need conditional_update() to report the relevant values back, not query them again later 15:18:26 yes.. sounds a bit tricky 15:18:56 Fix proposed on master 15:18:59 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/805027 15:19:42 guess this fix isn't completely accurate then 15:19:59 i'm not sure, need to take a closer look again 15:20:18 sure 15:20:24 Last one, we've already discussed this in the main meeting but a little reminder. 15:20:30 #topic bug_5 "[LVM] lvextend command crashes with code 139" 15:20:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1940436 15:20:42 #action(enriquetaso) take a look to os-brick 15:20:49 The rest of the bugs are driver related sort of bugs and already have patches proposed upstream so feel free to check the list and review them :) 15:20:55 #topic open discussion 15:20:59 Do we have any bugs for open discussion? 15:24:01 nothing from me ... thanks for organizing this, sofia 15:24:07 I guess we don't have any bugs for the open discussion then :P 15:24:11 thank you brian 15:24:23 #endmeeting