16:00:14 #startmeeting cinder-nova-api-changes 16:00:15 Meeting started Thu Jun 1 16:00:14 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ildikov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'cinder_nova_api_changes' 16:00:25 DuncanT ameade cFouts johnthetubaguy jaypipes takashin alaski e0ne jgriffith tbarron andrearosa hemna erlon mriedem gouthamr ebalduf patrickeast smcginnis diablo_rojo gsilvis xyang1 raj_singh lyarwood breitz jungleboyj 16:00:27 o/ 16:00:47 o/ 16:01:14 zOz 16:01:53 good morning :) 16:02:10 let's wait a minute to see if anyone else shows up 16:02:41 o/ 16:03:10 ok, let's deep dive in :) 16:03:20 so the list of merged patches are looking good: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/cinder-new-attach-apis 16:03:21 o/ 16:03:52 hemna's os-brick quick fix for the target_lun casting got merged as well IIRC 16:04:20 so we're slowly progressing towards having a working attach PoC 16:04:57 mriedem has patches up to figure out what to do with the microversion discocery 16:04:58 I put up a patch to the brick cinderclient extension yesterday 16:05:03 that uses the new attach/detach workflow 16:05:17 hemna: Do you have a link to that? 16:05:20 hemna: do you have a link handy? 16:05:25 jynx 16:05:32 smcginnis: ;) 16:05:40 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469594/ 16:05:50 hemna: tnx 16:08:18 hemna: did you run into any issues to discuss here? 16:08:37 not after the fix I put in for the lun id in brick 16:08:47 ok, cool 16:09:22 BTW, how does that work with brick, do we need a release now for that fix? 16:09:55 yes, and min version bump in g-r 16:09:57 if you need nova to use it 16:10:28 I think that's just the extension no hemna ? 16:10:40 jgriffith, correct 16:10:46 err... you mean the lun-id fix 16:11:09 we need a new release of brick yes 16:11:23 to get that fix in place and then bump the min version for nova 16:11:36 which is the os-brick patch? 16:11:42 when can we have a release? 16:11:51 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468108/ 16:11:53 right? ^ 16:11:59 yup 16:12:16 you can propose a release at any point 16:13:57 I was just wondering whether there's anything we're waiting on to get in before releasing or anything like that 16:15:38 hemna: smcginnis: can either of you take care of the brick release to get the fix available? 16:15:45 There are a bunch of open reviews of os-brick. Probably the only one that might be good to get in first would be for anew connector for lustre. 16:16:08 But I'm not sure if that has the rest of the things in place that we really need to wait for that. 16:16:23 smcginnis, ildikov we can work on finishing up reviews and get a new release out soon 16:16:34 yep 16:16:51 sounds good, tnx 16:17:36 is there anything with microversions that we should touch base on here? 16:18:01 besides the patches from mriedem I mentioned above 16:18:15 *should*? 16:18:16 :) 16:18:27 the attach poc needs to be rebased on those 16:18:29 if there's nothing else with brick beyond, plz review! :) 16:18:43 We have Cinder side things to discuss, but yeah I think mriedem 's solve the problem for now 16:18:49 i haven't looked at stvnoyes' live migration poc yet 16:18:52 mriedem yeah, I'll do that this morning 16:19:14 stvnoyes: how's the testing going with that? 16:19:15 cinder needs to fix the versioning stuff long term though 16:19:17 stvnoyes opened 2 bugs about regressions in rolling back a live migration, one i invalidated since i didn't see the issue in the code, and one i have a fix up for 16:19:19 jgriffith: +1 16:19:44 hold off on the migration rv. I found some problems during testing and if i can get devstack working after an update I'll get back to it 16:19:59 ok 16:20:17 mriedem: i responded to the bug, it wasn't in my patches 16:20:52 there is a problem there, (I checked github) 16:21:47 stvnoyes: ok re-open the bug please 16:22:01 and there's a couple of open issues in the PoC that I left comments for. they don't affect attach/detach but I hit them during migrate 16:22:17 stvnoyes I'll check them out 16:22:20 back to New? 16:22:32 stvnoyes: the error handling bits? 16:23:04 ok, back to Confirmed... 16:23:37 I don't recall exactly how I hit those issue. It could have been during rollback. 16:23:51 the PoC issues... ^ 16:24:38 stvnoyes: back to new, or just link me 16:25:38 stvnoyes: there are some issues with error handling in that PoC, I found some of those issues as well earlier, but you should not hit them with migrate I would think 16:26:14 stvnoyes: or well, depends on why you're rolling back I guess 16:26:23 they were pretty simple bugs, definitely issues 16:28:27 the PoC still needs work, so we'll look into that with jgriffith 16:28:42 ok this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1694834 16:28:43 Launchpad bug 1694834 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "libvirt rollback: destroy called with wrong number of args" [Undecided,Confirmed] 16:28:56 y, that's the one 16:30:09 ok anything else for this meeting? 16:30:23 I think we're mainly good for now 16:30:39 once the attach PoC is in a better shape we can think of how to deal with swap 16:30:44 for the new flow 16:31:18 I would guess the live migrate issues can be dealt with offline in case there are no more confusions on the bug report to discuss 16:31:48 so next steps are to fix the comments in the attach PoC and move it on top of Matt's micrvoersion patches 16:32:07 fix live migrate issues in parallel and get the brick release out as well 16:32:35 so I think we have enough home work for next week 16:33:00 the Cinder side of microversions can also be discussed outside of this meeting 16:33:13 anything else I'm missing? 16:33:25 or that someone would want to raise to discuss? 16:34:13 I take it as a no 16:34:27 thanks all! 16:34:48 keep on reviewing and testing :) 16:34:56 have a good day! :) 16:35:11 #endmeeting