14:00:14 <priteau> #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:00:15 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Sep 7 14:00:14 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is priteau. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:16 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:18 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:00:30 <priteau> #topic Roll call 14:00:36 <priteau> Hello everyone o/ 14:01:18 <openstackgerrit> Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Update lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/706358 14:01:46 <priteau> Welcome to Rafael Weingärtner who missed the last meeting 14:01:49 <rafaelweingartne> \o 14:02:03 <rafaelweingartne> Yes, sorry for that 14:02:34 <priteau> The agenda for today is: 14:02:37 <priteau> * Victoria release 14:02:37 <priteau> * Wallaby PTG plans 14:02:49 <priteau> #topic Victoria release 14:03:08 <priteau> This is a big week for the Victoria release 14:03:14 <priteau> * Feature freeze 14:03:19 <priteau> * Final release for client libraries 14:03:36 <priteau> * Victoria Community Goals Completed 14:03:43 <priteau> * Cycle Highlights 14:04:21 <priteau> Which means we need to finish merging all the code that we want to see in Victoria 14:04:50 <rafaelweingartne> I think we are almost there, we have only a few patches open 14:05:00 <rafaelweingartne> and most of them were already partially reviewed 14:05:11 <priteau> I went through most of the "code cleanup" ones 14:05:25 <rafaelweingartne> yes, me too 14:05:29 <priteau> A feature that I would like to see merged is the Monasca fetcher 14:05:33 <rafaelweingartne> and I also went through this one 14:05:44 <priteau> I need to dedicate some time to review it before Thursday 14:05:49 <rafaelweingartne> I already gave my +2 there 14:06:03 <priteau> It could be worth updating https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715623/ which is one of the few pending patches on the client 14:06:46 <rafaelweingartne> I can do that 14:06:55 <priteau> Thank you Rafael 14:07:02 <priteau> I am not sure about https://review.opendev.org/#/c/681660/ 14:07:26 <Haunted330> US holiday today 14:07:51 <rafaelweingartne> on the feature side, we have me neither, I started checking it, but have not been able to finish it 14:08:02 <rafaelweingartne> ops, I mixed the sentences. 14:08:06 <priteau> I think I've only been using the v1 API so I don't know how well supported is all the v2 API stuff 14:08:21 <rafaelweingartne> we are using v2 already 14:08:53 <rafaelweingartne> but we felt the need to extend and improve somethings there 14:09:28 <rafaelweingartne> that is why I have the patch 708121there 14:10:17 <priteau> I was going to ask, what about these two patches from you? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:%22Rafael+Weing%25C3%25A4rtner%22+status:open+project:openstack/cloudkitty 14:10:31 <priteau> They were submitted a long time ago, can you rebase them to make sure they still pass CI? 14:11:03 <rafaelweingartne> yes, I can 14:11:29 <rafaelweingartne> about the patch #681660, I am not sure what to do 14:11:39 <rafaelweingartne> if we review, do you think they will amend the patch? 14:11:49 <rafaelweingartne> would it be worth to take over it? 14:13:19 <priteau> I think we need to take it over. AFAIK Luka Peschke is not with Objectif Libre anymore and hasn't been contributing to OpenStack 14:13:46 <priteau> His last review was in March: https://www.stackalytics.com/report/users/luka.peschke@objectif-libre.com 14:14:32 <priteau> Same thing for Justin Ferrieu, no activity since March 14:14:34 <rafaelweingartne> yes, exactly 14:14:49 <rafaelweingartne> as we use v2, I will add this to my backlog then 14:15:21 <priteau> Thanks. We will need to release the client this week, probably Thursday 14:15:44 <priteau> We also have some prometheus collector bug fixes 14:16:00 <priteau> from "Ning Yao" 14:16:10 <priteau> Anyone here use Prometheus directly with CloudKitty? 14:16:37 <openstackgerrit> Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Update hacking for Python3 https://review.opendev.org/750178 14:16:48 <mkarpiarz> I'm looking into this now, Pierre. 14:17:32 <priteau> mkarpiarz: Nice, let us know how it works when you've got some results to share 14:18:02 <mkarpiarz> Sure thing. 14:18:23 <openstackgerrit> Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: add qty mutate in prometheus collector https://review.opendev.org/710496 14:18:35 <openstackgerrit> Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: fix empty metadata exception in prometheus collector https://review.opendev.org/710502 14:18:39 <openstackgerrit> Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: fix response format 'total' for v2 dataframes api https://review.opendev.org/710500 14:20:44 <priteau> I was taking a look at our CI jobs and unless I am mistaken, all jobs are using the Gnocchi collector 14:21:07 <priteau> For Wallaby one goal should be to have better coverage of the three different collectors 14:21:54 <rafaelweingartne> Agree 14:22:31 <priteau> For Victoria Community Goals, we don't have legacy jobs so that completes https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/victoria/native-zuulv3-jobs.html 14:23:20 <priteau> For https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/victoria/migrate-ci-cd-jobs-to-ubuntu-focal.html there is a submitted patch which doesn't pass CI checks 14:23:22 <priteau> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739317/ 14:23:45 <priteau> And it conflicts with newer commits, I can rework it 14:24:07 <priteau> Anything else to highlight for the Victoria release? 14:24:36 <rafaelweingartne> No 14:25:12 <priteau> Let's talk about Wallaby then 14:25:16 <priteau> #topic Wallaby PTG plans 14:25:42 <priteau> As you probably know, the PTG is happening from October 26 to October 30 14:25:54 <priteau> Anyone is welcome, registration is free 14:26:18 <priteau> #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg 14:26:20 <rafaelweingartne> yes, We will prepare something to discuss new features for the Wallaby version 14:26:30 <rafaelweingartne> I am not sure though, if that is the moment to discuss them 14:26:56 <priteau> One caveat is that I very likely won't be available for this event 14:27:18 <priteau> The reason is that I am expecting our second child to arrive just at that time 14:28:15 <rafaelweingartne> No problem :) 14:28:17 <rafaelweingartne> Congrats! 14:28:24 <priteau> Thanks 14:28:33 <priteau> Even if we have a separate discussion earlier so I can attend, I think we should book some slots to encourage discussions with the broader community 14:29:21 <priteau> Who is likely to be involved, and is there any date and time that works better for you? 14:29:24 <openstackgerrit> Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/python-cloudkittyclient master: Update hacking for Python3 https://review.opendev.org/715623 14:29:27 <rafaelweingartne> yes, I agree 14:29:33 <priteau> FYI possible times are visible at https://ethercalc.openstack.org/7xp2pcbh1ncb 14:29:39 <rafaelweingartne> I planned to discuss the dates via email. Would that work for you? 14:30:07 <rafaelweingartne> I did not understand that spread sheet :) 14:30:22 <rafaelweingartne> What are the names Austin, Bexar and so on? 14:30:24 <priteau> We can discuss via email if you prefer 14:30:29 <priteau> OK, let me explain 14:30:41 <priteau> First, there are three groups of timezones 14:30:59 <priteau> 4-8 UTC, 13-17 UTC, 21-1 UTC 14:31:43 <priteau> Austin, Bexar etc. are the names of the Zoom meetings rooms provided by the OpenStack Foundation 14:31:50 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Add py38 package metadata https://review.opendev.org/723344 14:32:08 <rafaelweingartne> Ah, I see 14:32:14 <rafaelweingartne> now it is clearer 14:32:20 <priteau> We can pick any room, doesn't matter 14:32:30 <priteau> The only thing to watch out for is potential conflict 14:33:08 <priteau> For example, I know there might be people in the Scientific SIG who are interested by CloudKitty (though I don't know if they would join the PTG discussions) 14:33:56 <openstackgerrit> Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Switch to newer openstackdocstheme and reno versions https://review.opendev.org/731954 14:34:15 <priteau> We can follow up by email but we have to register soon so the schedule is finalised 14:34:17 <rafaelweingartne> I see 14:34:24 <priteau> By end of this week 14:34:28 <rafaelweingartne> ok, will do that 14:35:54 <priteau> We should also find out if there are logs of earlier PTG discussions 14:37:22 <priteau> Nope, I cannot find any 14:37:50 <priteau> I looked on the wiki from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTG/Ussuri/Etherpads all the way to Pike 14:39:34 <priteau> For the next meeting we should start making a list of discussion topics 14:39:57 <priteau> We'll need to review existing specs and see which ones we would like to push forward 14:40:17 <priteau> Anything else for Wallaby? 14:40:28 <rafaelweingartne> yes, I think we should have something like a fixed topic to review not just specs but also RFEs, right? 14:40:50 <rafaelweingartne> normally, for other projects such as Neutron and Keystone, I start with an RFE 14:41:32 <priteau> On some other projects I've worked on it starts with a blueprint entry, but yes same idea 14:41:43 <priteau> Actually good point, we should do a bug triage as well 14:42:18 <priteau> And decide what to do about bug trackers, there are lots of open bugs on launchpad (and you can still open new ones), but the official tracker for CloudKitty is Storyboard 14:42:33 <rafaelweingartne> hmm 14:42:49 <rafaelweingartne> I think we will review that, and do some cleanup then 14:43:05 <priteau> Yes, and prevent opening new bugs on Launchpad if we want to stick with Storyboard 14:43:26 <rafaelweingartne> how do we do that? 14:44:35 <priteau> I don't know yet :) 14:45:13 <priteau> We probably need to get admin access to the cloudkitty launchpad project 14:45:43 <rafaelweingartne> I would say so 14:45:58 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Add Python3 victoria unit tests https://review.opendev.org/722987 14:46:03 <priteau> I will look into that 14:46:13 <rafaelweingartne> ok, thanks 14:46:15 <priteau> #action Recover access to Launchpad project 14:48:21 <priteau> The response for PTG is actually September 11th at 7:00 UTC 14:48:31 <priteau> So in practice September 10 (Thursday) 14:48:42 <rafaelweingartne> ok 14:49:15 <priteau> #action Request time for the PTG by September 10 14:49:21 <priteau> #topic AOB 14:49:30 <priteau> Anything else you would like to discuss today? 14:49:38 <rafaelweingartne> no 14:51:46 <priteau> Let's finish early then :) 14:52:21 <priteau> Just before we finish 14:52:38 <priteau> mkarpiarz: LuisRmz: rafaelweingartne: what are your preferred meeting times for the PTG? 14:53:32 <priteau> mkarpiarz and LuisRmz, you're both in Europe right? 14:53:42 <rafaelweingartne> 14 UTC works fine for me 14:53:54 <rafaelweingartne> I am on GMT-3 14:54:42 <priteau> That's what I assumed 14:56:31 <priteau> OK, let's wrap up 14:56:34 <priteau> Bye everyone 14:56:37 <priteau> #endmeeting