14:00:04 <rafaelweingartne> #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:00:05 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Feb 22 14:00:04 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartne. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:00:12 <rafaelweingartne> Roll count 14:00:40 <priteau> o/ 14:01:05 <mkarpiarz> Hi! 14:03:29 <rafaelweingartne> #topic New core reviewers 14:03:48 <rafaelweingartne> I proposed Marius as a new core reviewers. I guess that we will approve this proposal. I am not sure now about the next steps. 14:03:57 <rafaelweingartne> Maybe priteau could guide me through the process? 14:04:37 <priteau> On Gerrit, go to: 14:04:42 <priteau> Browse > Groups 14:04:50 <priteau> Search for cloudkitty-core 14:04:55 <priteau> Click on it 14:05:00 <priteau> Click members on the left 14:05:13 <priteau> There is an option to add a new member 14:05:54 <mkarpiarz> Thank you guys, I'm honoured! :) 14:06:06 <rafaelweingartne> hmm 14:06:11 <rafaelweingartne> I do not see this option 14:06:22 <rafaelweingartne> I see all of the different CloudKitty groups, but this one 14:06:28 <rafaelweingartne> I am logged in* 14:06:43 <rafaelweingartne> ah, I found it 14:06:45 <rafaelweingartne> never mind 14:07:16 <rafaelweingartne> So, I just add there? 14:07:27 <rafaelweingartne> mkarpiarz, can you confirm if this is your user? 14:07:29 <rafaelweingartne> Mariusz Karpiarz <mariusz.karpiarz@vscaler.com> 14:07:42 <mkarpiarz> Yes, that's me. 14:15:43 <rafaelweingartne> Ok, added 14:16:14 <rafaelweingartne> priteau: do I need to do anything else? 14:16:33 <rafaelweingartne> Welcome to the core team mkarpiarz 14:17:02 <mkarpiarz> :) 14:17:33 <rafaelweingartne> mkarpiarz, Can you test it? 14:17:40 <priteau> Hooray! 14:17:40 <rafaelweingartne> to see if you have the permissions now 14:17:41 <mkarpiarz> Are there any extra responsibilities that come with being part of the core? 14:18:23 <mkarpiarz> (aside for what I've been asked to do so far, so reviewing changes, submitting patches, etc) 14:18:29 <rafaelweingartne> I guess nothing much besides helping on reviews, and merging things sometimes 14:18:30 <priteau> mkarpiarz: You can now merge patches by voting with W+1. So don't merge stupid or buggy patches ;-) 14:18:31 <mkarpiarz> Checking now. 14:19:30 <mkarpiarz> Yes, I can see +-2s in code review and +-1 for workflow. 14:19:43 <rafaelweingartne> Awesome 14:20:10 <rafaelweingartne> Moving on... 14:20:10 <rafaelweingartne> #topic Review priorities 14:20:15 <rafaelweingartne> Do you guys have some review priorities to ask for? 14:20:29 <rafaelweingartne> I see that one of my specs was merged last week. Therefore, I will be working on the patch to submit this week 14:21:23 <mkarpiarz> I didn't have much time for Cloudkitty last week but this week should be better. 14:21:40 <mkarpiarz> I'll be testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/774520, unless there are other priorities. 14:22:07 <rafaelweingartne> ah, that is a cool one to test 14:22:11 <rafaelweingartne> we have in production already here 14:22:25 <priteau> There are two low-impact patches we can merge to clear the queue 14:22:27 <priteau> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/770236 14:22:29 <priteau> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/768506 14:23:09 <rafaelweingartne> agreed 14:23:31 <rafaelweingartne> mkarpiarz: would you do the honors? 14:24:32 <mkarpiarz> Both look good to me. 14:25:15 <rafaelweingartne> They can be your first merge :) 14:25:31 <priteau> mkarpiarz: We didn't say explicitly earlier, it is customary to require two +2 votes before merging 14:25:42 <priteau> These two patches have my +2 so you're good to go. 14:29:36 <priteau> mkarpiarz: You can give the +2 and W+1 in a single vote 14:29:36 <mkarpiarz> Ok, so what are we missing on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/770236? 14:29:50 <mkarpiarz> (to be able to merge) 14:30:29 <priteau> Nothing missing. 14:30:35 <priteau> It's in the Zuul gate now 14:31:09 <priteau> Zuul need to run gate jobs, it will take ~40 minutes 14:31:12 <mkarpiarz> Cool. How can you check what's in the gate? 14:31:17 <priteau> https://zuul.openstack.org/status#cloudkitty 14:31:43 <rafaelweingartne> Awesom! 14:32:56 <priteau> Should we move to the next topic? 14:33:27 <mkarpiarz> Thanks, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/768506 should be good to go soon as well. 14:33:27 <rafaelweingartne> Moving on... 14:33:32 <rafaelweingartne> #topic Help request 14:33:53 <rafaelweingartne> There was a help request, but I am not sure if the reported is here in the channel 14:34:02 <priteau> ping zigo 14:34:11 <rafaelweingartne> I guess that should be something to be discussed in the mailing list right? 14:34:21 <priteau> (not the first reporter, but someone else who saw the bug) 14:34:38 <priteau> I don't think it has to be on the mailing list. We have a bug tracker for this. 14:34:51 <rafaelweingartne> I put there some of the details we would need to help them, but I am not sure if they will provide a follow-up 14:34:54 <zigo> Yeah, got the bug with Victoria. 14:35:13 <priteau> Mailing list is good for more open-ended questions, when you don't really know who to ask, cross-project issues, etc. 14:35:32 <zigo> paste.openstack.org/show/802883/ 14:35:39 <rafaelweingartne> priteau, I mentioned the mailing list because it seems easier, at least to me, to request data, inspect code and so on before replying 14:36:05 <priteau> Well, you can do the same thing with Storyboard 14:36:24 <zigo> I'm available if you need me to investigate some data... 14:36:24 <priteau> For context, we are discussing https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008598 14:36:38 <rafaelweingartne> zigo: we would need more inputs, such as the gnocchi resource show for the problematic metric 14:37:06 <zigo> Hard to tell which is the problematic one... 14:37:21 <priteau> I wonder why we haven't seen this in CI. 14:37:43 <priteau> Could it be a regression from new gnocchi or gnocchiclient releases? 14:37:47 <rafaelweingartne> I am suspecting that the aggregation method `mean` is not configured to the CPU metric for instance 14:37:58 <rafaelweingartne> or maybe, the aggregation is using a different time frame 14:38:01 <zigo> rafaelweingartne: How would I do that? 14:38:15 <rafaelweingartne> gnocchi resource show <resource_id> 14:38:20 <rafaelweingartne> get the metric ID there 14:38:25 <rafaelweingartne> then, gnocchi metric show 14:39:10 <zigo> rafaelweingartne: We wont solve it during this meeting, but ok, we can investigate together if you have time for it. 14:39:26 <rafaelweingartne> we can interact in the Story board then 14:39:37 <zigo> One solution could indeed be cloudkitty nicely and gracefully printing the advise you're giving. 14:39:38 <rafaelweingartne> you could post the data there, and we move on from that point 14:40:00 <zigo> I'm not sure how to get the <resource_id> you're mentionning above ... 14:40:30 <rafaelweingartne> I see, it will be easier for us to interact there in the story board them 14:40:40 <rafaelweingartne> can you post your doubts there, and we move on via Story board then 14:41:06 <zigo> Well, ok, though it'd be faster if we interact on IRC, IMO. 14:41:16 <zigo> Then we can post on Storyboad when I know what to post. 14:41:24 <rafaelweingartne> I do not use IRC besides attending meeting 14:41:29 <zigo> :/ 14:41:32 <zigo> Wont be easy then. 14:41:57 <rafaelweingartne> Therefore, to me, it would be more problematic. I would prefer an Async method of interaction 14:42:30 <zigo> rafaelweingartne: Can we just take 10 minutes on IRC just after this meeting ? 14:43:56 <zigo> After that, I'm ok to use Storyboard. 14:44:44 <rafaelweingartne> zigo it will be lunch time here. I am already late for it :) 14:44:49 <zigo> :) 14:44:54 <zigo> Nv mind then... 14:45:07 <rafaelweingartne> Moving on... 14:45:09 <rafaelweingartne> #topic AOB 14:45:13 <rafaelweingartne> Now, I open for general questions and topics that people might have. 14:45:30 <mkarpiarz> Nothing on my side. 14:47:14 <mkarpiarz> I'll see if I can reproduce zigo's problem in my test environment. 14:48:24 <priteau> I've tried to reproduce the metadata issues I saw with Monasca, but it works in DevStack 14:48:33 <priteau> Maybe it was just a wrong configuration 14:48:49 <rafaelweingartne> mkarpiarz: I am suspecting a mismatch between the aggregation method or time frame used in CloudKitty and the one actually used in Gnocchi 14:48:54 <mkarpiarz> zigo: Could you paste your metrics.yaml file under the Story? 14:49:24 <rafaelweingartne> Anyways. Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week. 14:49:28 <rafaelweingartne> #endmeeting