14:00:04 #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:00:04 Meeting started Mon Aug 9 14:00:04 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:04 The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:00:09 Roll count 14:00:22 o/ 14:00:30 Hi! 14:00:54 \o 14:04:06 Before we start, a message, the next virtual PTG will take place October 18, at 14:00-17:00 UTC. 14:04:11 please, do not forget to register 14:04:18 Registration: https://openinfra-ptg.eventbrite.com/ 14:05:15 Already done :) 14:05:39 #topic Target review of the meeting 14:05:57 We had the patch as the target for the past meetings: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/786651 14:06:10 can we merge it? Or, would you guys want more time to review it 14:07:19 Sure, I'll merge it. 14:08:02 mkarpiarz had given his CR+2 in the past already 14:08:40 I didn't realise but since the changes in PS4 were minor I should have merged it right away 14:08:53 cool, thanls! 14:09:04 I gave my +2 again on the latest patch as well. 14:09:09 and about the next cycle? Do tou guys have a suggestion? 14:09:24 I would suggest the following: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/774520 14:11:37 Sounds good to me 14:12:04 I'll have to check latest changes to this one but I gave an older patch a +2 so should be good to go as well. 14:18:28 ok 14:18:30 thanks 14:18:41 I have a review request as well 14:18:46 shoot 14:18:46 Small but useful patch 14:18:47 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cloudkittyclient/+/800524 14:19:11 I am ok with this one 14:19:25 Discovered by one of customers who were trying to configure a project-specific rule to skip rating of some tenants 14:20:35 ok, I added it to the agend then 14:20:49 Looks good to me. 14:21:01 That would be all from my side 14:21:08 I will now open for general topics 14:21:09 #topic AOB 14:21:18 do you guys have something else that you would like to discuss? 14:22:21 Yes, what about this ticket: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2009022 ? 14:23:29 Looks like the orchestrator is now returning a list instead of a single object. 14:25:15 the code and the stack presented does not seem to match 14:28:11 Anyone has a cloudkitty-dashboard deployment ready to confirm 14:28:26 no 14:28:28 we do not use it 14:30:08 Should we ask the reporter to try to reproduce this outside of the dashboard then? 14:31:08 The dashboard communicates via the API only right? 14:31:37 So presumably it should be possible to reproduce outside of the dashboard 14:31:39 I don't know. 14:31:39 i would say so 14:31:59 We should also request him to use the latest commit 14:33:51 It would helpful to see a script running commands which result in the outcome because "repeatedly click" is very vague. 14:34:09 exactly 14:34:19 I checked the code, and it seems that it was always like that 14:34:41 Another review request: stable branches: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/cloudkitty+-branch:master+status:open 14:34:50 We also need to understand if his metrics.yml 14:36:06 I just asked some inputs from him there in Storyboard 14:37:10 Cool! 14:37:30 Thanks for this, rafaelweingartner. 14:37:54 I added priteau requests there as well 14:39:27 Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Custom query Gnocchi collector https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/786651 14:39:47 Anything else? 14:40:14 I guess not 14:40:21 Guyes, can we close for today? 14:40:36 Thanks rafaelweingartner 14:40:49 Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week. 14:41:18 Thanks, all. 14:41:21 #endmeeting