14:00:08 <rafaelweingartner> #startmeeting cloudkitty
14:00:08 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon May 16 14:00:08 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:08 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:08 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty'
14:00:17 <rafaelweingartner> Roll count
14:00:20 <rafaelweingartner> \O
14:00:21 <mkarpiarz> Hi!
14:03:48 <rafaelweingartner> #topic OpenInfra Summit Berlin 2022
14:04:18 <rafaelweingartner> We have two forums accepted. Now, we need to think about the approach we will adopt to conduct the forum panels.
14:04:47 <rafaelweingartner> First, the CloudKitty onboarding panel
14:05:12 <rafaelweingartner> I saw in the mailing list that we were discussing the operators feedback panel to showoff the use cases that we have
14:05:23 <rafaelweingartner> however, what if we used some of the use cases in the on-boarding?
14:05:33 <rafaelweingartner> to make the discussion more concrete
14:06:30 <mkarpiarz> I thought this session was supposed to be about the project itself...
14:06:30 <rafaelweingartner> The operator feedback I was envisioning something more like requests/complaints from operators on what they like, what they do not like, and what they would like to change in CloudKitty in the near future
14:07:13 <rafaelweingartner> you mean, about joining the project, contributing and so on
14:07:23 <rafaelweingartner> and not necessarely about using cloudkitty
14:09:17 <mkarpiarz> No, about CloudKitty but also explaining the architecture and how to use it.
14:09:38 <mkarpiarz> You know, something for beginners.
14:09:50 <rafaelweingartner> I see
14:10:26 <rafaelweingartner> Something like CloudKitty 101, like the concept of CloudKitty, requirements, setup, troubleshooting, and so on
14:11:02 <mkarpiarz> I think so. Unless it's a bad idea in your opinion.
14:11:50 <rafaelweingartner> I think it is fine, I was just interpreting the idea of the panel differently
14:11:56 <rafaelweingartner> but I like this other approach as well
14:13:11 <mkarpiarz> This might be tricky to pull off without a projector/screen though...
14:13:18 <rafaelweingartner> exactly
14:13:23 <rafaelweingartner> I was going to address that now
14:13:30 <rafaelweingartner> what approach should we use?
14:13:48 <rafaelweingartner> because a panel, we will not normally have access to such material
14:14:20 <mkarpiarz> It's your (and Pierre's) call; I'll only be there for the first day.
14:14:37 <rafaelweingartner> Sure =)
14:15:28 <rafaelweingartner> I guess we can prepare like a deck of slides maybe to guide the discussion, or, maybe a white sheet like a polster or something to allow us to sketch things up
14:16:51 <mkarpiarz> OK, what do you want to use to create this? A shared etherpad?
14:17:14 <rafaelweingartner> I was thinking on that
14:17:22 <rafaelweingartner> but, if there are no tables in the room
14:18:36 <rafaelweingartner> I was thinking in a flip chart
14:18:50 <mkarpiarz> I think it would be best to use something all three of us can add content to and then use this as a guide during the panel.
14:19:10 <rafaelweingartner> I see
14:19:18 <rafaelweingartner> then, an etherpad would be the best idea
14:19:21 <mkarpiarz> I just don't know which collaboration tool would be the best.
14:19:37 <mkarpiarz> Yeah, that's fine for me.
14:20:05 <mkarpiarz> Also, do you know if people will be allowed to join the panel remotely?
14:20:34 <rafaelweingartner> I did not receive this information
14:21:48 <mkarpiarz> Ah, OK.
14:23:18 <rafaelweingartner> So, the onboarding is going to be about the initial setups and design of CloudKitty. Then, we have the operators feedback where we will present/discuss the use cases we have with Ceilometer, Prometheus, and so on. Is that it?
14:24:04 <mkarpiarz> Yes, this makes sense to me.
14:24:12 <rafaelweingartner> ok
14:24:24 <mkarpiarz> onboarding -> for beginners, feedback -> for advanced users
14:24:30 <rafaelweingartner> I will create the two etherpads to guide these forum panels then and share with you guys
14:25:15 <mkarpiarz> Thanks. Share the link and we can start working on a outline. :)
14:26:35 <rafaelweingartner> sure, will do that
14:26:39 <rafaelweingartner> I will try to do that this week
14:27:14 <mkarpiarz> Thanks!
14:27:49 <rafaelweingartner> So, moving on
14:27:51 <rafaelweingartner> #topic Target reviews
14:28:12 <rafaelweingartner> The patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/830375, and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/832923 were approved and merged
14:28:27 <rafaelweingartner> but the bot did not execute the final merging process due to an issue in the CI
14:28:54 <mkarpiarz> Ah!
14:29:02 <rafaelweingartner> It is probably some library issue that appeared in between the patches being validated and then merged
14:29:03 <mkarpiarz> So what do we need to do?
14:29:11 <rafaelweingartner> I guess that the issue was resolved already by me in patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/837442
14:29:17 <rafaelweingartner> which is open, and there, the CI passes
14:30:08 <rafaelweingartner> therefore, we could review and get that patch merged, which would both resolve one CI issue and introduce a new feature :)
14:30:20 <rafaelweingartner> or, I can separate that fix, if you guys prefer so
14:33:02 <mkarpiarz> Either approach is fine by me. I'll check out and review 837442.
14:33:40 <rafaelweingartner> Ok, thanks!
14:33:52 <rafaelweingartner> there is also this one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/684734
14:33:59 <rafaelweingartner> waiting for other people's review
14:35:00 <rafaelweingartner> And, I also have these others: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/837200, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cloudkittyclient/+/838724, and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cloudkittyclient/+/839052
14:35:07 <rafaelweingartner> which is interesting to review and get merged
14:35:23 <rafaelweingartner> You already reviewed and approved the last one
14:36:53 <mkarpiarz> Sure, so this one is ready to be merged, right?
14:37:19 <rafaelweingartner> the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/684734 , yes
14:39:00 <mkarpiarz> OK, done.
14:39:14 <rafaelweingartner> thanks!
14:39:34 <rafaelweingartner> but, I guess, that it is going to have a similar issue when merging as the other ones
14:43:42 <rafaelweingartner> and, last but not least, the open floor moment.
14:43:49 <rafaelweingartner> #topic Open floor moment
14:43:57 <rafaelweingartner> Now, I open for general questions and topics that people might have.
14:44:28 <mkarpiarz> Nothing from my side.
14:46:58 <rafaelweingartner> Nothing else from my side as well
14:47:00 <rafaelweingartner> Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week.
14:47:06 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting