14:02:09 <rafaelweingartner> #startmeeting cloudkitty
14:02:09 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon Sep 18 14:02:09 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:09 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:02:09 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty'
14:02:12 <rafaelweingartner> Hello guys!
14:02:16 <rafaelweingartner> Roll count
14:02:20 <rafaelweingartner> \0
14:02:25 <priteau> o/
14:03:29 <mkarpiarz> Hi!
14:04:25 <rafaelweingartner> I am having some issues with my Gnone
14:04:35 <rafaelweingartner> just a second, I guess I will need to reconnect
14:05:06 <rafaelweingartner> I am back :)
14:05:10 <mkarpiarz> OK
14:05:41 <rafaelweingartner> #topic vPTG meeting
14:05:58 <rafaelweingartner> Do not forget to register at: https://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/
14:06:03 <rafaelweingartner> The date is approaching
14:06:16 <rafaelweingartner> We decided to pick Monday, the same timeslot as CloudKitty bi-weekly meeting to conduct the vPTG
14:06:30 <rafaelweingartner> I will schedule the timeslot, as I guess it is possible now
14:07:53 <rafaelweingartner> Are you guys ok with that?
14:08:03 <mkarpiarz> I'm all set up and ready for that. :)
14:08:12 <priteau> Yes, it looks like PTG website is clear now: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html
14:08:59 <priteau> rafaelweingartner: Do you think we could start at 1300 UTC?
14:09:13 <rafaelweingartner> It fine by me
14:09:17 <rafaelweingartner> what about you Mariusz?
14:09:24 <priteau> Beside I may need to allocate another meeting after.
14:09:50 <priteau> Are we planning one hour, two hours?
14:10:37 <rafaelweingartner> I guess, one hour should be enough
14:10:50 <rafaelweingartner> Last time, I think that we did not use two hours, right?
14:10:56 <rafaelweingartner> It was a bit over one hour
14:11:07 <mkarpiarz> Any time works for me.
14:11:21 <mkarpiarz> And yes, I think we should allocate 2h.
14:12:20 <priteau> Let's allocate 2
14:12:27 <rafaelweingartner> ok
14:12:39 <rafaelweingartner> what is the channel that the PTG bot listens to?
14:13:35 <priteau> #openinfra-events
14:15:08 <rafaelweingartner> thanks
14:15:09 <rafaelweingartner> done!
14:16:07 <rafaelweingartner> So, moving on
14:16:12 <rafaelweingartner> #topic OpenSearch support
14:16:23 <rafaelweingartner> I guess this is still on hold, right priteau?
14:16:41 <priteau> Still the same
14:18:07 <rafaelweingartner> ok
14:18:19 <rafaelweingartner> #topic  Monasca deprecation
14:18:24 <rafaelweingartner> The same for monasca
14:18:33 <rafaelweingartner> the goal will be to finally remove it on  C release
14:18:46 <rafaelweingartner> An now, the target reviews
14:18:50 <rafaelweingartner> #topic Target reviews
14:18:56 <rafaelweingartner> We have some new patches
14:19:12 <rafaelweingartner> I just would like to discuss the patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/861908
14:19:15 <rafaelweingartner> with you guys
14:19:21 <rafaelweingartner> it was requested a tempest test for it
14:19:35 <rafaelweingartner> but after investigating, wew noticed that there is no processor test in tempest
14:19:57 <rafaelweingartner> therefore, we would need to build it from scratch, which seems a good amount of energy for little return now
14:20:18 <rafaelweingartner> the code being changed has unit tests, therefore, it seems to be ok as is now
14:22:30 <priteau> I assume it has been tested outside of CI?
14:22:58 <priteau> I left some minor comments on the reno
14:23:12 <priteau> OK to approve the patch itself if you are confident it works
14:24:16 <rafaelweingartner> yes, it has
14:25:42 <rafaelweingartner> ok, thanks!
14:27:01 <rafaelweingartner> how do we make a hyperlink in that yml file of the release noteS?
14:27:45 <priteau> Like this:
14:28:09 <priteau> `LP#1875223 <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875223>`__
14:28:20 <priteau> `text <url>`__
14:29:41 <opendevreview> Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Use correct metadata for metrics gathered from gnocchi  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/861908
14:30:46 <opendevreview> Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Fix a concurrency issue when locking reprocessing tasks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/894810
14:30:59 <rafaelweingartner> I amended the patches you guys reviewed
14:31:00 <rafaelweingartner> thanks!
14:31:28 <rafaelweingartner> Before we talk about SQL Alchemy, do you guys want to discuss some other patch?
14:32:33 <priteau> Are all the other patches listed in the meeting topics ready for review?
14:33:50 <rafaelweingartner> yes
14:33:51 <rafaelweingartner> they are
14:36:18 <priteau> I will try to review a few more
14:37:03 <rafaelweingartner> ok, thanks!
14:38:46 <rafaelweingartner> And now, the SQL Alchemy
14:38:51 <rafaelweingartner> #topic SQLAlchemy 2.x / oslo.db 14.0.0 compatibility
14:39:26 <rafaelweingartner> I have tried using SQL Alchemy in the past with Pedro, but it broke so many places, that we just gave up
14:39:37 <rafaelweingartner> maybe with support in oslo.db, it gets a bit easier
14:39:47 <rafaelweingartner> priteau: the stage is yours. Do you have something to add? Or some experience with it?
14:40:06 <priteau> Sorry, not much to add except what is in the mailing list discussion
14:40:49 <opendevreview> Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Fix a concurrency issue when locking reprocessing tasks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/894810
14:40:49 <priteau> rafaelweingartner: wheny ou say tried using in the past, do you mean in another project?
14:40:53 <priteau> cloudkitty is already using oslo.db and sqlalchemy
14:41:01 <rafaelweingartner> yes
14:41:03 <rafaelweingartner> Gnocchi
14:41:28 <rafaelweingartner> I mean, with Olso DB 14
14:41:52 <rafaelweingartner> I am not sure if it would break something, and/or if we would need to change much in Cloudkitty to adopt it
14:42:18 <priteau> I don't think we have a failure trace on Gerrit? Only what zigo said on the mailing list
14:42:25 <rafaelweingartner> exactly
14:42:39 <rafaelweingartner> I looked to see if I would find some error, but I could not find any
14:43:09 <priteau> I suppose we try a patch that depends on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/879743
14:44:01 <rafaelweingartner> maybe the problem is with this "sqlalchemy-migrate"
14:44:04 <rafaelweingartner> that is being removed
14:44:14 <rafaelweingartner> we use it, right?
14:44:20 <opendevreview> Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Bump oslo.db to 14.0.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/895692
14:44:25 <priteau> Maybe. Let's see
14:45:01 <priteau> I don't see sqlalchemy-migrate in our repo. We use alembic
14:45:18 <rafaelweingartner> thanks!
14:45:25 <rafaelweingartner> ah, so I confused things then
14:45:56 <priteau> I can try working a bit on this and following what's going on in the community
14:46:02 <priteau> You are have a lot on your plate
14:46:35 <rafaelweingartner> Sure, if you need any help then, just let me know
14:46:57 <rafaelweingartner> thanks for the help =)
14:47:38 <rafaelweingartner> BTW, that hacking I needed to do because of Shinx
14:47:47 <rafaelweingartner> do you know how to get people to create a release for https://opendev.org/x/wsme/tags?
14:47:57 <rafaelweingartner> I pingede the owned of the project, but got no answer
14:48:03 <rafaelweingartner> the patch has already been merged there
14:48:40 <priteau> Have you tried stephenfin on IRC?
14:48:47 <rafaelweingartner> I tried on email
14:49:01 <rafaelweingartner> I am not a fan of using IRC...
14:49:31 <priteau> Looks like they are active anyway, many patches updated just a few days ago: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:x/wsme+is:open
14:49:39 <zigo> priteau: You don't have an error because of the pinning, your patch #895692 will show it ...
14:50:01 <priteau> They probably will want to merge these patches before releasing
14:50:08 <priteau> So give it a bit of time.
14:50:21 <priteau> If no progress in two weeks let's try again
14:50:25 <zigo> The current plan is to release 15.0.0 with the SQLA 2.x patches reverted.
14:50:46 <zigo> And then in early C, re-merge ...
14:51:29 <zigo> (see the chatlog from last release team meeting)
14:52:31 <priteau> OK, thanks zigo
14:53:38 <zigo> If you produce SQLA2.x / oslo.db patches not released in Stable, please do track them in the etherpad (sorry, I don't have the link to that SQLA2.x patch tracking etherpad, but it's somewhere...).
15:02:33 <rafaelweingartner> thanks zigo!
15:02:46 <rafaelweingartner> priteau and mkarpiarz: is that all for today?
15:02:51 <priteau> Yes, thank you
15:03:10 <rafaelweingartner> Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week.
15:03:14 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting