14:00:14 <rafaelweingartner> #startmeeting cloudkitty
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon Nov 13 14:00:14 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty'
14:00:19 <rafaelweingartner> Hello guys!
14:00:22 <rafaelweingartner> Roll count
14:01:37 <priteau> o/
14:05:11 <mkarpiarz> Hi!
14:05:40 <priteau> Hi both
14:07:15 <rafaelweingartner> \0
14:07:31 <rafaelweingartner> #topic vPTG meeting
14:07:57 <rafaelweingartner> We had a great vPTG, where new people showed up, and I guess this shows that we might be attracting some new users to CloudKitty
14:08:07 <rafaelweingartner> it was a productive meeting that we had.
14:08:12 <rafaelweingartner> Thank you all for participating!
14:09:38 <priteau> rafaelweingartner: did you share the attendance numbers with the foundation?
14:09:50 <rafaelweingartner> yes, I did
14:10:16 <priteau> Great
14:12:59 <rafaelweingartner> As nobody has anything to add regarding the vPTG. I will move on to the next topic of the meeting.
14:13:03 <rafaelweingartner> #topic Monasca deprecation
14:13:09 <rafaelweingartner> I guess we are moving on with the reviews
14:13:13 <rafaelweingartner> and testing, right?
14:13:23 <rafaelweingartner> preteau: do you think we can make it for C release?
14:13:49 <priteau> I think so.
14:13:56 <priteau> Do you see any blockers?
14:14:21 <rafaelweingartner> no, I do not
14:14:28 <rafaelweingartner> but we are not the ones behind it :)
14:14:37 <rafaelweingartner> so, maybe there would be something that we are not seeing
14:15:29 <rafaelweingartner> ah, I copied the wrong topic. The Monasca is on our side. I do not see any blocker, we just need to open the patch.
14:15:41 <rafaelweingartner> I meant for the topic to be OpenSearch support
14:15:48 <rafaelweingartner> #topic OpenSearch support
14:15:59 <priteau> Oh, I see
14:16:01 <rafaelweingartner> that is the one I wanted to ask about :)
14:16:06 <priteau> Well this one needs review from the team here
14:16:16 <priteau> We think it's ready to go
14:16:29 <mkarpiarz> Great!
14:17:15 <priteau> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/880739
14:17:37 <rafaelweingartner> ok, thanks for the update
14:17:43 <rafaelweingartner> we will try to help reviewing it
14:18:45 <mkarpiarz> Same here. I'll add the change to my test environment.
14:19:10 <priteau> Thank you.
14:19:41 <rafaelweingartner> Moving on, #topic Target reviews
14:20:11 <rafaelweingartner> We have the patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/862824, which depends on #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/861786. Are you guys ok with the merging of #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/861786?
14:20:23 <rafaelweingartner> Or, do you think that we need something else there?
14:21:50 <priteau> I left a minor comment
14:21:53 <mkarpiarz> To me the dependency looks ready to be merged.
14:22:00 <priteau> I haven't had a chance to try it for real
14:22:23 <rafaelweingartner> I see
14:22:36 <priteau> rome
14:22:47 <priteau> Wrong window, sorry
14:23:26 <priteau> I will give my +2 but hopefully will have a chance to try it on a dev environment before release
14:24:33 <mkarpiarz> Yes, I'd left some comments based on what I could see in my test environment.
14:25:05 <mkarpiarz> None of them should be blocking the merge though, hence my +2.
14:25:24 <opendevreview> Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/cloudkitty master: Add groupby options by different timeframes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/861786
14:25:37 <rafaelweingartner> done
14:25:42 <rafaelweingartner> thank you guys for your support!
14:25:51 <rafaelweingartner> we are making cloudkitty better every release!
14:26:46 <rafaelweingartner> Moving on. We have the patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/895204, which adds support to InfluxDB V2 to Cloudkitty
14:26:55 <rafaelweingartner> that is an interesting one to aim for 2024.1 release
14:27:01 <rafaelweingartner> Reviews are welcome!
14:28:34 <priteau> Can we test it in devstack please?
14:28:56 <rafaelweingartner> What do you mean with that?
14:29:03 <rafaelweingartner> you mean conducting a test and reporting?
14:29:16 <rafaelweingartner> Or, doing some other further addition to some other project?
14:29:40 <mkarpiarz> Is it possible to deploy Influx in DevStack?
14:30:27 <rafaelweingartner> I am no sure
14:30:37 <rafaelweingartner> Probably it is
14:30:40 <rafaelweingartner> but I am not sure about V2
14:32:08 <mkarpiarz> Yeah, I'd be using containerised Influx in my test environment but trying this change in DevStack sounds like a good idea.
14:32:37 <priteau> Of course, Zuul runs DevStack on every patch and installs influxdb_1.6.3_amd64
14:33:13 <priteau> https://opendev.org/openstack/cloudkitty/src/branch/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L282-L302
14:33:18 <mkarpiarz> Aha!
14:33:46 <rafaelweingartner> So, are you guys suggesting to change DevStack and Zuul for that one?
14:33:49 <rafaelweingartner> So it also tests on V2?
14:34:16 <priteau> Zuul is the engine running CI
14:34:33 <priteau> We don't need to change much in the zuul config, probably just add another job
14:35:07 <priteau> And allow a parameter in the devstack plugin to specify which influxdb version to deploy
14:36:23 <rafaelweingartner> ok
14:36:28 <rafaelweingartner> can you guys add that to the review?
14:36:37 <rafaelweingartner> and then, we can plan on our side on how to do that
14:37:43 <priteau> Done
14:37:48 <rafaelweingartner> thanks!
14:38:24 <rafaelweingartner> Moving on, we have the patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/895166, which is an interesting improvement for setups that are based on Gnocchi.
14:45:00 <rafaelweingartner> In addition to that one, we also have the patch #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/894812, which is interesting for people that use the reprocessing API
14:45:35 <priteau> Both look OK at a glance, but I am not able to test them
14:47:37 <rafaelweingartner> We already have them in PROD
14:47:48 <rafaelweingartner> so, a code-wise review would be fine
14:48:46 <mkarpiarz> OK
14:49:38 <rafaelweingartner> besides those issues, as we are getting close to the time limit of the meeting, do you guys have something else to add?
14:50:24 <priteau> OpenSearch v2 support has been around one year in the making so it really needs our focus, thanks in advance for the reviews
14:50:43 <rafaelweingartner> sure, we will do that
14:50:48 <rafaelweingartner> thanks for the hard work !
14:51:02 <priteau> Another topic is stable backports: https://review.opendev.org/q/Id1145adff82bc9a01e4eb0f306f0bfa535142459
14:51:11 <priteau> 4 patches need review
14:52:03 <rafaelweingartner> done
14:53:17 <priteau> thanks
14:54:41 <rafaelweingartner> if you guys have nothing else to add, I guess we can close for today.
14:54:46 <rafaelweingartner> Thank you guys for participating. Have a nice week.
14:54:56 <mkarpiarz> Thank you!
14:55:06 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting