14:00:19 #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:00:19 Meeting started Mon Sep 15 14:00:19 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:00:21 Hello guys! 14:00:24 Roll count 14:00:25 \o 14:03:46 o/ 14:04:26 Nice to see you Priteau! 14:04:52 Sorry, I have had conflicts with another meeting for many weeks now 14:05:00 It finished early today 14:05:00 no worries :) 14:05:05 glad you are here now 14:06:04 so let's start 14:06:08 #topic vPTG 14:06:27 Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Fix FileBackend in Python 3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/957435 14:06:30 I have registered the team, and we just need to book the room. However, I think that the room registration is not open yet. 14:06:37 o/, sorry im late :) 14:06:46 no worries, we just started =) 14:07:06 as soon as the room registration is open, I will do so in our usual vPTG time slot 14:07:16 which is basically, our usual meeting time 14:07:24 is that ok for you guys? 14:07:56 October 27? 14:09:01 yes 14:09:28 I might be on holiday, unsure. But if I am working I will make myself available. 14:09:34 Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Remove unused [state] options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/957436 14:09:34 ok 14:09:37 Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Drop unused BaseIOBackend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/957437 14:09:38 i am eager to see you guys again there 14:09:46 me too 14:11:36 so, moving on 14:11:41 #topic Target reviews 14:11:56 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/960374 14:12:09 is an interesting one, I just asked the author to remove one extra space in the code 14:12:24 other reviews would be welcome in this one, and in the others that we will go through today 14:15:49 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/950542, this one Pedro and I reviewed. IF you are ok with it, priteau: I guess we can merge it 14:17:15 Is this a bug fix that we would backport? If yes, can you add a release note? 14:17:32 hmm 14:17:40 I think it would be an interesting patch to backport 14:17:55 I am not the owner of the patch, but I guess we can ask the author to create a reno release notes 14:18:24 Also the Git author should be updated from "root " ;-) 14:18:50 I will respond 14:18:57 I did not get it 14:20:22 now, I see what you mean 14:20:44 moving on, we have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/960032 14:20:52 it is changing a default for the cloudkitty threads 14:21:14 It changes a default configuration, I do not know what should be our policies. However, the change seem to make sense 14:21:22 We never use those configs as default 14:22:54 That's a good one 14:22:58 cool 14:23:04 can you do the honours then? 14:23:08 We are sometimes working with nodes that have 192 cores 14:23:29 exactly 14:23:48 That would be 184320 threads? 14:24:33 a lot:) 14:24:47 Approved 14:25:09 thanks! 14:25:23 moving on #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/950868, we have this one 14:25:26 we are fine with it 14:25:35 therefore, we are just waiting your feedback 14:26:10 I will review in more depth soon. It's going to be for the G release anyway 14:26:24 ok 14:26:34 An important one is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/961242 14:26:41 Cherry pick for 2025.2 14:27:08 I thought it would be included in 2025.2 directly, I didn't realise you had not updated the release SHA 14:27:15 I merged some of those 14:27:36 I also did not paid attention to this one 14:27:46 We should have updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/960069 as soon as it merged. 14:28:12 ok 14:28:42 The cleanup patches merged to master recently should probably have waited until after feature freeze ended too 14:29:03 did not it finish? 14:29:08 Sorry, I see they just merged this afternoon 14:29:12 Git history confused me 14:29:25 I mean, the feature freeze was already over 14:29:39 I merged today only 14:29:55 Yeah, as I said Git history confused me just now, sorry. 14:30:01 :) 14:30:32 I know some projects don't start merging to master right after RC1 because they want to keep the master branch stable in case they need to make some important fixes + backports 14:30:44 I see 14:30:53 but in our case is more or less controlled, right 14:33:14 Moving one, we also have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/953827 14:33:44 It is a patch proposed by me, which is an interesting feature to be used to enable people to configure methods/expressions to skip persisting some of the processed rating points 14:40:08 moving one, we have this other small patch, which is interesting as well to have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/953762 14:40:48 on a similar line, we have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/958374 and #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/954880 14:45:25 as we are reaching our final minutes. Instead of going over the other patches, I would like to open for the open floor, for people to discuss/comment things that they find important. 14:48:27 i dont know if you noticed, but we submitted a patch to add the Loki testing to the CI: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/960455 14:48:44 which might be very useful to be able to ensure that everything works as expected 14:50:38 rafaelweingartner: Should we make an RC2 to include the security patch? 15:00:38 I would say so 15:00:55 jlarriba: yes, I did notice it 15:01:49 ack 15:02:37 rafaelweingartner: will you propose a release patch? 15:02:44 sure I can 15:02:50 I took some note here to do 15:02:57 I will just wait for the patches to get merged 15:03:02 I am not sure if they were already all merged 15:03:05 Someone is asking if we can backport the thread count patch 15:03:14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/960032 15:03:56 maybe 15:03:56 Maybe we backport it but don't try to include it in the rc2? 15:04:03 ok 15:04:09 It could have bad effects that we haven't noticed yet 15:04:23 exactly 15:04:27 and it is not that important 15:04:30 For the security fix, you need to wait until it has merged 15:04:36 someone can always override the defautls 15:05:02 true 15:05:30 and that is basically it =) 15:05:32 great job guys! 15:05:42 thank you all for participating. Have a nice week! 15:07:09 #endmeeting