14:02:24 <rafaelweingartner> #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:02:24 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon Oct 13 14:02:24 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:02:24 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:02:24 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:02:30 <rafaelweingartner> Hello guys! 14:02:35 <rafaelweingartner> Roll count 14:02:39 <rafaelweingartner> \o 14:05:41 <priteau> o/ 14:07:11 <rafaelweingartner> nice to see you here 14:10:17 <rafaelweingartner> Let's start 14:10:19 <rafaelweingartner> #topic vPTG 14:10:31 <rafaelweingartner> everything seems to be ready, room is booked, date is scheduled 14:10:44 <rafaelweingartner> I also already create an initial scratch for the etherpad 14:10:59 <rafaelweingartner> I will then amend with some more information about releases and information 14:12:34 <priteau> Monday at 14UTC? 14:13:04 <priteau> *Monday October 27* 14:13:11 <rafaelweingartner> yes 14:13:27 <rafaelweingartner> that is how we normally do it, in our usual meeting time, right? 14:13:35 <priteau> Yes 14:15:38 <rafaelweingartner> is that timeslot fine? 14:15:42 <rafaelweingartner> or do we need some change? 14:15:57 <rafaelweingartner> as nobody mentioned anything before, I just maintained the usual that we use 14:16:24 <priteau> It's OK for me for 30 minutes. I might need to leave after that but Matt should be around for one hour. 14:16:48 <rafaelweingartner> I see 14:16:52 <rafaelweingartner> I guess that would be fine 14:20:19 <rafaelweingartner> let's move on. If needed we can adjust the day and timeslot 14:20:21 <rafaelweingartner> let me know 14:21:22 <rafaelweingartner> #Target reviews 14:21:46 <rafaelweingartner> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/963621, this one is an important one I guess 14:21:49 <rafaelweingartner> to fix our pipelines 14:21:55 <rafaelweingartner> can you guys review it 14:22:01 <rafaelweingartner> and approve if you think that one is fine to be merged 14:23:06 <priteau> Done 14:23:58 <rafaelweingartner> awesome! 14:23:59 <rafaelweingartner> thanks 14:26:14 <rafaelweingartner> if everything is fine there, I guess we could merge it 14:27:15 <priteau> Gerrit issue, my vote didn't post 14:27:27 <priteau> Merging now 14:28:06 <rafaelweingartner> thanks! 14:28:46 <rafaelweingartner> then, we have this one #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/960374, which I also think we can merge 14:31:15 <rafaelweingartner> I executed a recheck in this one #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/950542 14:34:21 <priteau> Just a note on recheck, the community has been asked to avoid "bare rechecks", i.e. rechecks without a reason 14:37:20 <rafaelweingartner> yes, but I just did it because the patch that is going to fix is going to be merged 14:38:02 <rafaelweingartner> you, now, we always should add a reson? 14:38:05 <rafaelweingartner> I mean, a written one? 14:38:12 <mrunge> that is my understanding 14:38:40 <mrunge> like recheck opendev.org 404 14:38:50 <mrunge> (just making something up) 14:39:09 <mrunge> it would help to group issues by reason 14:39:09 <priteau> I don't always do a thorough investigation of the issue, but at least which job failed, and ideally why 14:39:33 <rafaelweingartner> I see 14:39:53 <rafaelweingartner> I will do that next time then 14:40:31 <mrunge> The request not to do bare rechecks comes up about once every year 14:40:55 <rafaelweingartner> :) 14:40:56 <rafaelweingartner> yes 14:40:57 <rafaelweingartner> I have see 14:41:00 <rafaelweingartner> seen* 14:44:20 <mrunge> Any thoughts on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/961609 ? It helps spreading out requests to the loki storage, where the query window is smaller than 30 days, i.e. you can not search for data for a whole month 14:45:01 <mrunge> some deployments try to limit the search window to a couple of days or a week, which is of course problematic for cloudkitty 14:47:46 <priteau> Left a comment to address 14:48:04 <mrunge> thank you! 14:48:14 <mrunge> Will get it addressed asap 14:48:44 <rafaelweingartner> thanks! 14:50:05 <rafaelweingartner> Then, #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/953827, it would be interesting to get some feedback here as well 14:52:32 <priteau> Still not too keen on the eval(). I have to think about it. 14:52:51 <rafaelweingartner> ok 14:53:01 <rafaelweingartner> I wait for you to mature 14:53:09 <rafaelweingartner> but this is somethign common that we use in other systems 14:53:22 <rafaelweingartner> remember, it is a config on the server side done by the operator 14:55:35 <priteau> Yes, I understand. 14:59:25 <rafaelweingartner> Do you guys have something else to add to the meeting? 14:59:38 <rafaelweingartner> we still have 10min, and the other patches I guess we can discuss in our next meeting 15:00:56 <priteau> I have to leave for another meeting 15:03:25 <rafaelweingartner> ok 15:03:27 <rafaelweingartner> thanks! 15:04:00 <rafaelweingartner> thank you all for participating. Have a nice week! 15:04:07 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting 15:04:11 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting 15:04:18 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting