13:59:24 #startmeeting cloudkitty 13:59:24 Meeting started Mon Jan 5 13:59:24 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:59:24 The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 13:59:30 Hello guys! 13:59:35 hello 14:00:21 Happy new year! 14:01:05 Yes, Happy new year to all you too! 14:02:02 Roll count 14:02:04 \o 14:02:33 o/ 14:03:00 I believe Juan is still out 14:03:14 o/ 14:04:08 #topic Target reviews 14:04:34 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/953827, we have this one that has been in the making for a while. Your feedbacks are welcome there. 14:07:31 o/ 14:08:18 rafaelweingartner: I was off for a couple of weeks. I will try to review during the next 2 weeks 14:08:26 ok, thanks! 14:12:44 Moving on, we have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/969934, which I just did a recheck. Let's see if the tests pass 14:13:19 Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Ignore sample config file created in doc build https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/971627 14:16:59 moving on, we have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/965897. priteau: are you fine with it now? 14:20:12 Yes, +2 14:20:43 thanks! 14:20:44 merged 14:21:12 moving on, we have #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/958204, I am not sure on how to porceed here. The patch propsoses somethign to a code that I am not sure if it is even used anymore in production. 14:21:17 what do you guys think? 14:24:19 If it's stated somewhere, that the v1 driver is deprecated, then it seems strange to me to add new config options to it. 14:25:18 oh, it's not completely new, he's just modifying code for an existing one 14:27:20 exactly 14:27:39 but this code/api should be probably remove some time 14:30:28 The change looks fine, but I agree with v1 being deprecated there doesn't seem much point in merging new features to it 14:30:57 Do we have any planned timeline for removing this backend? 14:31:01 not yet 14:31:16 should we discuss this in during our next meetings? 14:32:10 Sure. 14:32:25 +1 14:32:39 ok, I will add a note for us to mature the topic with time 14:32:48 Code looks good to me. It just depends whether something should be merged into v1 driver. 14:33:18 exactly 14:33:46 I think if the backend will stick around for a while yet, albeit deprecated, it doesn't hurt to merge this patch. It shouldn't change any behaviour, just validate existing behaviour. 14:34:05 yes 14:34:41 I agree 14:35:49 I'll give it a closer review and +2 if it all looks good then :) 14:36:11 ok, thanks matt! 14:37:28 and last, but not least, we have the following new spec #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty-specs/+/966753. I hae not read it. However, I think that we should try to target it for this up comming release 14:38:26 I was about to mention it :) 14:39:36 I've not had the time to read this yet. I'll take a look in the coming weeks 14:40:09 Thanks Matt! 14:40:23 thank you 14:42:05 and that is all from my side. Do you guys have something else to add? 14:48:56 I guess we can close today then 14:51:30 There's nothing else from me. Thanks for hosting :) 14:51:49 thank you all for participating. Have a nice week! 14:52:04 #endmeeting