14:00:47 <rafaelweingartner> #startmeeting cloudkitty 14:00:47 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Mon Sep 14 14:00:47 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rafaelweingartner. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:47 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:47 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cloudkitty' 14:00:51 <rafaelweingartner> Roll count 14:00:52 <rafaelweingartner> \0 14:01:41 <jlarriba> o/ 14:01:45 <mattcrees> o/ 14:01:52 <jwysogla> o/ 14:02:31 <rafaelweingartner> nice to see you all! 14:03:54 <rafaelweingartner> Let's start 14:03:56 <rafaelweingartner> #topic October vPTG 14:04:13 <rafaelweingartner> CloudKitty team is registered, but the time slot is not taken yet 14:04:20 <rafaelweingartner> the PTG bot is not setup 14:07:38 <rafaelweingartner> I guess we still need to wait some more time 14:07:39 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/cloudkitty master: Fix for typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1002856 14:08:47 <rafaelweingartner> moving on 14:08:49 <rafaelweingartner> #topic Target reviews 14:09:40 <rafaelweingartner> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1000975, I have not reviewed it. However, it might be interesting for us to try to get this in in the comming weeks. 14:10:39 <rafaelweingartner> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1003149 has a request for a change. I will work on it this week. 14:11:31 <rafaelweingartner> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1001578 is an interesting and complex issue. Do you think that it is fine for this one to get in without a spec? Or, should we request a spec to better understand the idea/concept and its limitation? 14:12:35 <mattcrees> I was talking to Dawud about that one earlier, he plans to write a spec for it. 14:12:43 <rafaelweingartner> ah, I see 14:12:46 <rafaelweingartner> that might be interesting 14:13:03 <rafaelweingartner> It is something we have discussed about here, and it is nice to see somebody proposing it. 14:16:27 <mattcrees> Agreed, it should be a nice feature 14:22:49 <rafaelweingartner> cool 14:22:51 <rafaelweingartner> thanks 14:23:09 <rafaelweingartner> I am just not sure about backporting something this big in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1000891... 14:23:17 <rafaelweingartner> but it is something, I guess we can discuss 14:25:22 <jwysogla> yea, is there a particular reason why this would need to be backported? 14:26:18 <mattcrees> It would be useful to people using Kolla-Ansible to have this backported, because influxdb support has been removed. I think in the 2026.1 release 14:26:20 <jwysogla> also, I'd expect a backport to go through all the intermediate branches and not jump from main all the way to 2025.1 14:27:23 <jwysogla> ok, now it makes sense to me at least why you'd want to backport it 14:28:21 <mattcrees> It might be worth splitting it into smaller patches, so we can be more confident in backporting each part. Something to discuss in the spec perhaps 14:28:34 <rafaelweingartner> I agree 14:28:46 <jwysogla> agree 14:35:04 <rafaelweingartner> my laptop froze, sorry for that 14:35:33 <rafaelweingartner> I guess we can discuss deeper this matter in the spec, right? 14:35:53 <jwysogla> +1 14:35:56 <mattcrees> Yeah, seems the best place for it 14:37:12 <rafaelweingartner> moving on, we hae another spec #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty-specs/+/549278 that is waiting for the author to respond to reviewers 14:42:05 <rafaelweingartner> And then, we have two WIP #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty-tempest-plugin/+/976346, and #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty-tempest-plugin/+/977982. I am not sure if they are still on the roadmap os stackHPC 14:43:00 <mattcrees> We would like to get to them, but they're not currently on the roadmap afaik 14:44:58 <rafaelweingartner_> and that is it from my side. Do you guys have something else to add? 14:45:26 <mattcrees> Just a small thing, I've proposed backports to this one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/1005565 14:46:32 <rafaelweingartner_> ok 14:46:43 <rafaelweingartner_> So, the idea is then to backport the other patch that you will propose? 14:47:12 <mattcrees> The other patch is already backported: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cloudkitty/+/982265 14:47:45 <mattcrees> Just at the time we didn't realise this was causing issues because of my original fix. 14:48:03 <rafaelweingartner_> I see 14:48:19 <rafaelweingartner_> I guess that is fine then 14:50:58 <rafaelweingartner_> If there is nothing else, I guess we can close for today 14:51:30 <mattcrees> Nothing else from me, thanks :) 14:51:41 <jwysogla> nothing from me as well 14:52:18 <rafaelweingartner_> thank you all for participating. Have a nice week! 14:52:30 <mattcrees> Thanks for hosting! 14:52:31 <rafaelweingartner_> #endmeeting 14:52:44 <rafaelweingartner_> #endmeeting 14:53:23 <rafaelweingartner> #endmeeting