04:01:25 <ekcs> #startmeeting congressteammeeting 04:01:26 <openstack> Meeting started Fri Nov 30 04:01:25 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ekcs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:01:27 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:01:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'congressteammeeting' 04:01:47 <ekcs> hello! welcome back to biweekly congress team meeting. 04:02:05 <akhil_jain> ekcs: hello! 04:02:06 <ekcs> please add your topics to this etherpad here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-meeting-topics 04:02:27 <ekcs> hello akhil_jain ! 04:04:32 <ekcs> how’s it been akhil_jain ? 04:05:33 <akhil_jain> ekcs: everything fine. just this gate issue is bugging me alot :D 04:05:54 <akhil_jain> what about you? 04:06:33 <ekcs> hahaha. got it. 04:06:49 <ekcs> i’ve been doing ok just been having a really stubborn cold all week =/ 04:07:04 <ekcs> well let’s talk about gate then. 04:07:10 <ekcs> #topic gate 04:07:46 <ekcs> this info could be out of date. but I noticed that all the postgres jobs in congress has been failing because of an error happening in nova. 04:08:07 <ekcs> a bug was filed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1804084 04:08:09 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1804271 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "duplicate for #1804084 nova-api is broken in postgresql jobs" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Riedemann (mriedem) 04:08:57 <ekcs> so hopefully it’ll be fixed soon. and we don’t need to do anything for now. 04:09:12 <ekcs> it’s not affecting us too much because our postgres jobs are non voting. 04:09:23 <ekcs> akhil_jain: you notice any other gate issues? 04:09:49 <akhil_jain> not yet but i am continuously looking into 04:10:10 <akhil_jain> my recent patch also timed out 04:11:03 <akhil_jain> tacker driver patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604275/ 04:11:41 <ekcs> ah yes. we’ve been seeing some time outs like that. not all the time but sometimes. 04:11:55 <akhil_jain> hm 04:12:25 <ekcs> i’m not completely sure of the cause. 04:12:29 <ekcs> on this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616134/ 04:12:51 <ekcs> I thought maybe it’s an intermittent rabbitmq issue on the test node. 04:13:22 <ekcs> because I looked at one requset that timed out and in the congress engine logs it looks like the engine never received the request. 04:13:31 <ekcs> haven’t looked deeply at the other ones. 04:15:37 <akhil_jain> i will try to dig more into it and will share if i found something 04:16:00 <ekcs> ok! 04:16:38 <ekcs> well moving on then. 04:16:54 <ekcs> #topic experimental repo spec 04:17:15 <ekcs> I updated the spec based on discussions last meeting. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616077/ 04:17:41 <ekcs> not sure if we have anything to discuss now. but if we do please go ahead. 04:19:24 <akhil_jain> yes i have gone through it. I think its worth a try 04:21:28 <ekcs> ok thanks for going through it! feel free to leave a review if you get the chance. further comments welcome of course! 04:22:08 <akhil_jain> ya sure will do that 04:22:15 <ekcs> thanks! 04:22:32 <ekcs> ok moving on for now then. 04:22:39 <ekcs> #topic tacker driver 04:22:57 <ekcs> I see akhil_jain you updated the patch. 04:23:25 <ekcs> there is a discussion about how to handle the multiple VDUs 04:23:44 <ekcs> but ramineni not here today so maybe it’ll take place on gerrit 04:24:13 <ekcs> anything you want to say about the patch akhil_jain ? 04:24:34 <akhil_jain> ok, will wait for review then. 04:25:45 <akhil_jain> about multiple VDU i have added different table. that way it is more convenient for making policies. thats what i thought 04:26:49 <akhil_jain> keeping VDUs in VNF will make it very much complex to handle 04:27:32 <ekcs> that makes sense. 04:27:57 <ekcs> I’m guessing ramineni was thinking if it’s always a single mgmt_url then put it in the top table. 04:28:26 <ekcs> but youre saying there are multiple. 04:28:44 <ekcs> I agree that it’s hard to manage multiple urls in a single field. 04:29:09 <akhil_jain> ya maybe, i have responded on patch. lets wait for her review to that 04:29:22 <ekcs> great! 04:30:14 <ekcs> btw it’s great how you’ve made the extract fn cleaner and used the declarative translator to do the work instead of the custom code! 04:30:50 <ekcs> should make it much easier for other/future contributors to understand and maintain 04:30:56 <akhil_jain> :) got that idea from your review thanks! 04:32:32 <ekcs> oh haha i didn’t even think of that tho. glad you did 04:33:08 <ekcs> well seems like that’s all the topics for today. 04:33:26 <ekcs> #topic open discussion 04:34:02 <akhil_jain> also for nova driver changes, do you have any more input on that? 04:34:23 <akhil_jain> ramineni: Hi 04:34:45 <ramineni> akhil_jain: hi 04:34:54 <ekcs> nope it looks good to me! 04:35:07 <ramineni> sorry joined late , looks like meeting is over ;) 04:35:17 <ekcs> oh hi you made it! 04:35:56 <ramineni> ekcs: :) 04:36:09 <ramineni> akhil_jain: looks good , what is min nova api version supported? 04:36:14 <ramineni> for stein release 04:36:16 <ramineni> ? 04:36:38 <ekcs> I think min version is still 2.0 (or 2.1 which is the same just microversion) 04:37:02 <ramineni> ekcs: oh , great , then should be fine , 04:37:44 <akhil_jain> yes both are supported and i checked both were having address field 04:38:17 <ramineni> akhil_jain: +1 , +2ed your patch 04:38:33 <akhil_jain> great, thanks for review 04:39:08 <ekcs> ok let’s go ahead and merge that patch then. 04:39:24 <ekcs> just workflowed. 04:39:51 <ekcs> ramineni: do you have any thoughts for now on the experimental repo spec? 04:41:11 <ramineni> ekcs: not as of now, ill check today and let you know if any comments 04:41:28 <ekcs> great no rush. just asking =) 04:41:53 <ekcs> ok well anything else for today? 04:42:22 <ramineni> nothing from my side 04:42:24 <akhil_jain> none from my side 04:42:54 <ekcs> alright then. more next time =) 04:43:03 <ekcs> have a great weekend! 04:43:29 <akhil_jain> ok, bye. happy weekend! 04:43:36 <ekcs> bye all! 04:44:39 <ekcs> #endmeeting