16:00:33 #startmeeting containers 16:00:34 Meeting started Tue Jan 23 16:00:33 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is strigazi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'containers' 16:00:40 #topic Roll Call 16:00:48 Spyros Trigazis 16:00:51 o/ 16:00:57 o/ 16:01:26 0/ 16:02:07 hi 16:02:45 Thanks for joining the meeting oikiki clenimar ricolin slunkad 16:02:49 Agenda: 16:02:53 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Containers#Agenda_for_2018-01-23_1600_UTC 16:03:05 #topic Announcements 16:03:09 None 16:03:13 #topic Review Action Items 16:03:28 strigazi to draft the PTG schedule [DONE] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/magnum-ptg-rocky 16:03:45 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/magnum-ptg-rocky 16:04:09 strigazi to look for a new meeting time APAC friendly [incomplete] 16:04:31 o/ 16:04:35 Sorry for this ricolin, I'll try to move it this week 16:04:47 strigazi, yeah, I though we're moving this week:) 16:04:58 hi ykarel 16:05:08 #topic Blueprints/Bugs/Ideas 16:05:22 Cluster Federation https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/magnum+branch:master+topic:bp/federation-api 16:05:25 [ready for review] 16:05:29 strigazi, NP, remember to change wiki and openstack-infra/irc-meetings 16:06:16 clenimar do you want to say a few thing for the work on federation? What is the status etc 16:06:27 ricolin: yes, thanks 16:06:36 strigazi, sure 16:07:39 we've got two patches ready for review (db layer and api controllers). I'm currently working on the fedora-atomic driver implementation, which is also published as a wip 16:08:42 hi, sorry for the delay 16:08:45 and I'd love some feedback, especially on how to use softwaredeployments to manage the federation (create, join members etc) 16:09:12 clenimar: how kubefd is going to be fetched on the node? Are there any restrictions on version compatibility? 16:09:33 clenimar: all the work will happen on master, right? 16:09:40 * master node 16:09:51 strigazi, yes, all the the work is done in the master node of the hostcluster 16:10:16 we're currently downloading the binary and we can set the version 16:10:55 Did you use the RBAC patch I have written? Is ti working for you? 16:11:40 Does kubefed the same version as kubernetes? 16:11:51 Does kubefed follow the same version as kubernetes? 16:12:11 haven't tried the RBAC patch yet, but it looks good. 16:12:20 yes, kubefed follows the version 16:12:44 we can set it to a specific release 16:13:02 to match the cluster 16:13:25 we're currently creating clusters on which version? 1.7.4? 16:14:37 The version comes from the conainers that fetched using the kube_tag label. We shoud get he version from the api server and fetch the proper version 16:15:19 yes, we can do that 16:15:37 We can have a patch that finds the version and also returns it to heat 16:15:50 cool 16:15:50 ricolin: makes sense? ^^ 16:16:14 yes 16:16:27 I think we can have dependencies in software deployments 16:17:37 clenimar: do you need anything else apart from feedback? Are there any show stopper atm? 16:19:13 strigazi, also about os-collect-config, working on a patch to change the config, which should be able to target some current waste of connection issue 16:19:47 clenimar: are you there? 16:19:48 I've got some doubts on the driver implementation itself... should we create a separate template definition for the federation? or can we just trigger the actions from the exisiting cluster template? 16:20:22 ricolin: I'll get to that in a bit 16:21:00 clenimar: sinse federation has its own api, we can act on the heat stack directly 16:21:47 clenimar: the cluster temlate won't change 16:21:56 updating the stack whenever we want to perform an operation? 16:22:11 clenimar: yes 16:23:13 and how would it work for join/unjoin operations? 16:24:14 clenimar: the api will need to do actions against the heat stacks that it needs. 16:24:40 clenimar: Let's continue on this in the reviews or in #openstack-containers right after 16:24:51 ok, thanks 16:25:10 ricolin: what change are you doing for os-collect-config? 16:25:28 about the deploy url? 16:26:09 a config in os-collect-config will change the polling list 16:26:43 `collectors` config in config file 16:27:02 why do we need this? What is the problem? 16:27:02 so we can avoid poll from other sources 16:27:16 to avoid hitting the metadata server? 16:27:30 strigazi, that will be one of the issue 16:27:50 also protentially https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1744362 16:27:50 Launchpad bug 1744362 in Magnum "heat-container-agent fails to communicate with Keystone." [Medium,Confirmed] 16:28:46 ok, is there a patch up? 16:28:57 ricolin: ^^ 16:29:17 will send it out today or tomorrow(one hour left for today) 16:29:35 ok 16:30:51 I'm not sure why the internal_url is given to the nodes, Ill 16:30:57 I'm not sure why the internal_url is given to the nodes, I'll check it 16:31:10 ok, next 16:31:21 Cluster healing spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529897/ 16:32:19 The spec is in good state, so please have a look, I'll add my vote as well 16:32:41 ricolin ykarel have you seen it ^^ 16:32:57 strigazi, not yet 16:33:05 ricolin: Are you aware of it? 16:33:29 strigazi, actually no, but will give a look now!lol 16:33:52 ricolin: speard the word to your team 16:34:12 slunkad: your team might also be interested 16:34:32 strigazi, surly will 16:34:52 yes 16:35:56 cool, next: kubernetes patches: RBAC, config fixes, CI fix https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/magnum+branch:master+topic:bug/1726482 16:36:56 ykarel: is the redirection working now for centos and ubuntu as well? I didn't have to look at it again 16:37:08 strigazi, yes 16:37:16 we can take it 16:37:20 cool 16:37:59 ykarel: did you check the RBAC+(minor fixes) patch? 16:38:10 strigazi, yes, i left a comment there 16:38:23 can you check 16:38:27 ykarel: ok, thanks 16:38:47 and from me is: 16:39:16 Cluster Upgrades: spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/433728 16:41:27 Since the release is 3 weeks away, I'll rush this and next week, I think we should take a first iteration, ykarel what do you think? Since it doesn't break existing functionality and adds new API paths, it is safe. thoughts? 16:42:34 strigazi, will look tomorrow morning, after that i am on PTO, but it's ok to take the first iteration 16:42:56 ok 16:43:37 Let's move to: 16:43:40 #topic Open Discussion 16:43:52 oikiki: slunkad do you have anything? 16:44:16 strigazi: My two patches are ready for your review 16:44:36 i finished up the cache barbican certs fro periodic tasks yesterday 16:45:05 https://review.openstack.org/534364 16:45:12 oikiki: ok I'll have a look 16:45:22 and send cluster metrics config param is ready: https://review.openstack.org/529098 16:45:50 great! thanks 16:45:53 :) 16:47:14 others, do you have anything else? 16:48:26 ok, we can end the meeting then 16:48:33 not from me:) 16:48:36 Thanks everyone 16:48:40 strigazi, thx 16:48:46 #endmeeting