18:01:53 #startmeeting cue 18:01:54 Meeting started Tue Sep 22 18:01:53 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sputnik13. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:01:57 The meeting name has been set to 'cue' 18:02:07 role call 18:02:08 o/ 18:02:12 o/ 18:02:15 o/ 18:02:35 o/ 18:02:43 s/role/roll 18:02:45 ;) 18:02:59 pfff, nitpicker :-P 18:03:33 * sputnik13 pokes davideagnello 18:03:44 where's esmute 18:03:53 o/ 18:04:10 ok, action items 18:04:15 #topic Action Items 18:04:35 #note AI #1 davideag_ to continue developing https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/multi-broker-support 18:05:33 see no update on the BP since the last meeting, is there a goal for what we want to have done in the BP prior to the summit? 18:05:41 yes, not much progress on this since last week. I have started breaking down the different areas that require more background information. 18:06:15 sputnik13: we want a design proposal for the summit 18:06:19 Yea we should nail this down by the summit and present there 18:06:26 ok, thinking it would be good to have concrete things we need decisions or discussions on at the summit rather than it being open ended 18:06:48 ok, so given that we have about a month to nail things down 18:06:49 sputnik13: that's right 18:07:13 will put aside more time near the end of this week 18:07:15 saying just so we keep it in perspective :) 18:07:23 ok, sounds good 18:07:29 #action davideag_ to continue developing https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/multi-broker-support 18:07:50 next action... 18:07:56 o/ 18:07:59 #note AI #2 sputnik13 to fill in details for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/kafka 18:08:06 welcome esmute :) 18:08:23 Sorry for the tardiness :( 18:08:49 no work on the kafka front once again... kicking that can down the road... I also need to step that up since it will probably provide useful information for the multi broker support 18:08:57 #action sputnik13 to fill in details for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/kafka 18:09:15 sputnik13: yes, will be asking you very shortly :) 18:09:33 esmute no worries, don't do it again!! ;) 18:09:42 #note AI #3 vipul sputnik13 to file cross-project summit discussion on service VMs 18:09:53 vipul you already did this yes? 18:10:06 one sec.. have an update 18:10:08 its sad we didnt get the talk accepted.. otherwise, we would have more urgency in getting this done 18:10:37 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203880/ 18:10:38 esmute: yes, so sad... especially given how much free time we have ;) 18:10:51 so Bruno submitted a nova-spec about this 18:11:09 who is bruno 18:11:15 catalyst 18:11:28 oh that bruno 18:11:33 the one we met 18:11:35 ? 18:11:56 yes.. 18:12:02 added a bunch of people as reviewers 18:12:07 cool 18:12:21 so we need to follow this one istead of filing yet another session 18:12:34 we just need a room for the discussion then, is that something we need to push or is there someone organizing things like these? 18:12:51 this will probably be a nova session 18:13:13 ok, makes more sense anyway since they're the ones that need to get it done right 18:14:34 vi oscon 18:14:44 next action... 18:14:50 oops 18:14:50 esmute: wrong window :-P 18:15:00 opening oscon? 18:15:05 nice.. i need to have files like that 18:15:23 #note AI #4 dkalleg to provide details in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/status regarding more accurate rabbitmq status check 18:15:35 yeah.. we need to change the host... Its been too long in portland :p 18:15:52 I still need to do some research here. Will work on prioritizing this. 18:16:03 ok 18:16:38 I think we're pushing that out post 1.0, is that correct vipul ? 18:17:04 we were targeting a 1.0 release for Mitaka iirc 18:17:20 We shoudl prioritize it for M.. won't get into L 18:17:26 too late for L 18:17:33 isn't L out? 18:17:38 nope 18:17:43 Liberty 3 is 18:17:51 liberty final should happen next month 18:17:51 is there a L4? 18:17:54 ok 18:18:06 so we're trying to get a 1.0 for L4 18:18:24 Yea probably won't make it into that then 18:18:25 but ongoing status should be post 1.0 18:18:46 We should do a release.. and call that 1.0 since it's production ready.. 18:19:00 and it's unlikely that we can get more things in at this point 18:19:09 so... I think the point is the priority for ongoing status is lower than we thought it was last week 18:19:42 Yea .. should figure out how we want to solve it though.. 18:20:08 agreed, but priority is still less 18:20:58 so... no need to rush it this month 18:21:09 that's fine 18:21:39 ok, that's it for past actions 18:21:41 #action dkalleg to provide details in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/status regarding more accurate rabbitmq status check 18:22:08 any discussion topics? 18:22:13 #topic Open Discussion 18:22:59 security groups for broker VM ports 18:23:21 link? 18:23:31 new BP #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/broker-security-groups 18:24:16 makes sense to me 18:24:36 post beta feature? 18:24:42 post 1.0 18:24:49 what beta 18:24:53 :) 18:25:38 technically we're supposed to approve a BP aren't we 18:26:03 does this BP need more or is it good to approve? 18:26:15 I think this is straight forward.. we can target for M 18:26:29 it's not an API change, it's a backend change, so just code and configuration 18:26:30 whoops, yes post 1.0 18:26:49 cool 18:27:03 I mean, agreed, target M 18:27:29 we need to define series so we can target things to series 18:27:43 #action sputnik13 or vipul to define series in launchpad 18:28:10 #note https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cue/+spec/broker-security-groups approved for M series 18:28:20 anything else on this? other topics? 18:28:56 if there's nothing else we should move on to bugs 18:29:25 the silence is deafening 18:29:39 post 1.0 are we looking to target additional broker support first? 18:30:11 yes, post 1.0, but I think we need a fleshed out design before we can say what release we would target 18:30:33 so "post 1.0" could be 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, x.x 18:32:03 * sputnik13 taps on the mic 18:32:06 hello? 18:32:10 is this thing on? 18:32:29 ok 18:32:34 o/ 18:32:39 nothing else from me 18:32:45 ok, bugs 18:32:49 yes 18:33:03 #topic Bugs 18:33:10 no new bugs since last week 18:33:19 #note No new bugs 18:33:40 2 open bugs 18:33:48 https://bugs.launchpad.net/cue/+bug/1466609 18:33:49 Launchpad bug 1466609 in Cue "user supplied network is not validated before attaching" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Min Pae (sputnik13) 18:34:15 fix has been submitted, just needs unit tests before it's ready to review 18:35:14 still in progress, will be done asap 18:35:47 oops 18:35:50 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cue/+bug/1466609 18:35:51 Launchpad bug 1466609 in Cue "user supplied network is not validated before attaching" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Min Pae (sputnik13) 18:36:03 ok, next open bug 18:36:08 ? 18:36:23 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cue/+bug/1426103 18:36:23 Launchpad bug 1426103 in Cue "Validate UUID API parameter's at API layer instead of DB interface" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Abitha Palaniappan (abitha-palaniappan) 18:36:49 havent started on it yet. 18:36:52 ok 18:37:29 would be great if we can get it in to 1.0, but not high priority 18:37:45 ok will start on it soon 18:37:57 cool 18:38:03 that's it for bugs 18:38:33 should we call it? 18:38:45 end it early for a change? :) 18:38:51 yep i'm good 18:38:57 ha 18:39:03 Nothing more from me. 18:39:22 k, meeting adjourned 18:39:26 #endmeeting