07:59:50 #startmeeting daisycloud 07:59:51 Meeting started Fri Sep 23 07:59:50 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is huzhj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:59:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:59:55 The meeting name has been set to 'daisycloud' 08:00:30 Hi @zhouya 08:00:44 Hi 08:01:25 Let's wait for a while for others 08:01:33 OK 08:02:47 Hi @kongwei 08:03:02 hi 08:03:04 how is your day:) 08:03:19 I am fine, thank you. 08:03:54 Good 08:04:20 #topic Roll Call 08:04:25 #info Zhijiang 08:04:31 #info kongwei 08:04:39 #info zhouya 08:04:48 Hi zhouya 08:05:04 Hi @JingSun 08:05:08 #info SunJing 08:05:14 hi 08:05:35 Hi wei 08:06:21 OK, let's move on 08:06:24 #topic Core Code Abstraction 08:07:46 #info luyao 08:07:51 @zhouya, any good news from your side ? I saw you seem have finished a patch to abstract a general layer for the baremetal privitioning 08:08:09 yes 08:08:13 sorry, provision 08:08:44 I just finish the patch of abstract OS installation type 08:09:07 Can you please simply describe the basic architecture about that layer? 08:09:19 but,we have a little problem on dashboard 08:09:47 I have notify sunjing to modify it 08:10:31 I split the os.py to pxe and bifrost 08:10:42 was the problem related to your work ? 08:10:57 so we can use bifrost in the future to install OS 08:11:23 no,the problem is the OS version problem 08:11:42 Yes, I saw your spliting work, but I don't understand why you create two file named api.py and install.py for each of them 08:12:34 @zhouya could you please show us the url of your patch? 08:12:55 api.py is the interface pxe or bifrost exposed to osdriver.py 08:13:05 OK 08:13:12 sorry, I am late 08:13:34 #info @zhouya created a patch to abstract a general layer for baremetal provisioning 08:13:45 Hi @zhuzeyu, it is OK 08:13:52 Nice to see you 08:13:54 review.openstack.org/#/c/372867/ 08:14:20 actually 08:14:29 #info #link http://review.openstack.org/#/c/372867/ 08:14:44 we can just use install.py to realize this interface 08:15:09 OK 08:15:44 I hope everyone can take a couple of minutes to review @zhouya's work 08:15:57 We can discuss the realization of api.py together 08:16:17 Sure 08:16:21 I will test this patch tomorrow 08:16:29 Good. 08:16:45 while sunjing“s patch merged 08:17:27 @JingSun can you also provide the url of the patch which solve @zhouya's problem ? 08:17:37 @zhouya I have commit the bug to Gerrit. 08:18:07 OK, thank you 08:19:09 @huzhj ok, 08:19:42 http://review.openstack.org/#/c/375296/! 08:20:09 this one? 08:20:51 @JingSun 08:21:50 @JingSun, if it helps , you can provide the url after the meeting. 08:22:08 ok 08:22:21 Please do remember to add us as reviewer 08:22:25 send you later 08:22:33 otherwise, we may miss it. 08:22:56 exactly 08:23:05 OK, anything else from @zhouya? 08:23:19 no 08:23:25 Good. 08:23:54 For me, I have delete a whole bunch of glance code. 08:24:03 great 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364098/ 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369117/ 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372004/ 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372021/ 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372049/ 08:24:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372078/ 08:24:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/372207/ 08:24:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375278/ 08:24:12 great! 08:24:16 #info These above patch delete approx. 37600 lines of glance code. 08:24:28 good 08:24:50 so many 08:24:53 I hope now we can have a clearer view of our code. 08:25:37 huge code 08:26:10 @luyao, anything from your side about this topic? 08:26:42 @huzhj review.openstack.org/#/c/375296 08:27:30 @JingSun, got it. 08:27:53 I think it is good 08:28:31 I think @luyao also work on this topic because she is diving into template and auto scaling code. 08:28:56 I test auto scaling code 08:29:29 But need more time to figure out if these functions can be splited as general layer and specific layer 08:29:34 and find a little need to modify 08:29:41 Good 08:30:04 release your code early so that everybody can get invoved 08:30:12 I think auto scale code are general code 08:30:17 all 08:30:24 Good news 08:30:42 ANything else? 08:30:58 and I alsoread config code 08:31:12 you mean the configset code? 08:31:30 I think service and component can be special for tecs 08:31:38 yes 08:33:41 #info @luyao is working on service and component code and auto scaling code. auto scaling is a general functionality while service and component are not , they may be only for a special backend 08:34:17 @luyao, about service and component let's discuss offline for lacking of time 08:34:37 ok 08:34:47 OK, shall we move to the next topic? 08:34:52 yes 08:35:00 #topic Bifrost/Ironic Integration 08:36:03 For this topic , only we can do now is contribute to ironic to let ironic agent to get more detail pci device info. 08:36:27 so, @zhouya, any progress update from your side? 08:36:44 what about the patch for ironic agent ? 08:37:10 I modify the code last week 08:37:43 But unfortunately,my code didnot pass the unittest 08:38:23 Iwill dive into the commit to see if I can modify the unittest 08:38:56 And to make it pass the unittest 08:38:58 Yes, That is the right way. May be you can ask for help from ironic team 08:39:51 OK,thank you I think I should send a email to ironic team 08:40:02 Good 08:40:25 #action @zhouya will ask for help from ironic team to solve unittest problem 08:41:40 Anything else for this topic? 08:42:02 no 08:42:24 I think we need more time to spend on studying kolla/bifrost , because newton is comming 08:42:53 OK, next topic 08:42:53 #agree 08:43:16 #topic OPNFV: Daisy4nfv CI Framework Progress 08:43:38 @JingSun , for this topic , I saw your patch has been commited to OPNFV 08:43:52 Yes 08:44:10 But it has some little issues to rectify 08:45:01 we have made a conference call this week. 08:45:08 I think we need to contact to the OPNFV infra wg to see if we are using the env in a right way 08:45:21 with whom? 08:45:28 talked something about pod issues. 08:45:42 guys from OPNFV? 08:45:58 yes 08:46:03 Good 08:46:08 any conclution? 08:47:13 maybe I can use opnfv pods with opnfv-build-Ubuntu for build jobs. 08:48:04 And virtual deployment jobs can run with ate-pod2. 08:48:31 #info @JingSun said we can use opnfv-build-Ubuntu for build jobs and virtual deployment jobs can run on zte-pod2 08:48:40 zte-posix? 08:49:15 maybe need a new vm for deploy. 08:49:17 @JingSun I don't know what zte-posix is 08:49:31 please ping me on #opnfv-octopus regarding opnfv-build-ubuntu hosts and pass me the packages your builds might depend so we can install them for you 08:49:38 If we can supply ourself 08:50:13 @fdegir thanks for the infomation, we will do that. 08:50:32 I mean Zte-pod x 08:50:38 a new pod 08:50:58 Really? we got a new pod, that great. 08:51:25 @fdegir thank you 08:51:57 @JingSun could you please contact with @fdegir for further collaboration? 08:52:06 Ok 08:52:14 I will do that 08:53:01 @action @JingSun will contact with @fdegir on #opnfv-octopus regarding opnfv-build-ubuntu hosts usage. 08:53:07 #action @JingSun will contact with @fdegir on #opnfv-octopus regarding opnfv-build-ubuntu hosts usage. 08:53:57 OK, anything else for this topic? 08:54:20 nothing for me 08:54:24 Good 08:54:30 #topic Bare Metal Deployment(PXE/IPMI) Test 08:55:03 I think @luyao and @zhouya are working on this test , any result until now? 08:56:02 Ijust test the PXE/IPMI baremetal deployment 08:56:04 we can deploy success with pxe/ipmi but need merge sunjing's above code 08:56:20 #agree 08:58:21 OK, I will give priority to that patch 08:59:12 I forget another patch also needed witch not merge 08:59:23 #info we can deploy success with pxe/ipmi with a patch from @JingSun (#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375296/) 08:59:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375296/ 08:59:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373675 09:00:16 this patch conflict with mine 09:00:23 It can also merge after zhouya code merge 09:00:29 I will deal with the conflict 09:01:07 you can merge first,Imodify it later 09:01:15 OK 09:01:21 let's hold https://review.openstack.org/#/c/373675 for a while to let @zhouya's refactory code to go in first, OK? 09:01:30 ok 09:01:33 Good, consensus 09:01:48 Guys, we are running out of time 09:02:22 The last thing, I'm thinking about whether or not to cancel the next meeting. because of the national day vacation. 09:02:45 so if you have any opinion, please send email to me. 09:02:50 #agree 09:02:58 ok 09:03:01 ok 09:03:05 ok 09:03:16 OK, that is all for today 09:03:17 Bye 09:03:21 bye 09:03:23 Bye 09:03:23 bye 09:03:28 #endmeeting