08:01:21 #startmeeting daisycloud 08:01:22 Meeting started Fri Mar 31 08:01:21 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is huzhj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:01:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:01:25 The meeting name has been set to 'daisycloud' 08:01:36 #info luyao 08:01:37 #topic Roll Call 08:01:43 #info Zhijiang 08:02:27 #info alexyang 08:03:27 Today's topic 08:04:00 1) Roll Call 08:04:00 2) OPNFV: VM/BM Deployment & Functest Integration 08:04:00 3) Escalator Support 08:04:00 4) Cinder/Ceph support 08:04:00 5) Daisy as Kolla Image Version Manager 08:04:01 6) Multicast Image Distribution 08:04:01 7) AoB 08:05:13 before those topic I would like to metion I can not manage to contact to other core members of Daisy4NFV to proceed this PS https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/31965/ 08:05:13 #info zhouya 08:05:39 So I will try to merge it directly 08:06:34 #topic OPNFV: VM/BM Deployment & Functest Integration 08:06:47 hi zhijiang, the build jobs failed for several days 08:06:58 so there is no new version to use 08:07:58 like this ? #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/daisy4nfv-verify-master/482/console 08:08:37 luyao and my commit havn't merged 08:08:52 yes 08:09:53 #info Julien 08:10:05 till the commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447969/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450056/ 08:10:17 Seem exceed the node capabilities... https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/lf-build1/ 08:10:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450056/ this commit is the bug fix of the deploy 08:11:41 I have see the fail of bm deploy 08:12:08 huzhj, ohh, I submmit a path, which means that the issue is not resolved 08:12:23 I submit the patch to block with each other 08:12:52 but https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/lf-build1/ shows there is still one slot that not used 08:13:13 https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/31517/ 08:13:40 more work will be done on this, I will troubleshooting this issue 08:13:45 I will cancel some of them 08:13:46 Oh, Julien-zte you mean , they block by each other so event there is slot left but they can not run ? 08:14:08 I mean, each master block the other jobs run in this node 08:14:18 to prevent dead-lock for new excutors 08:14:46 first of all:seems the deploy.sh do not call the 'daisy install $cluster_id' command 08:15:06 #info Julien will solve the job dead lock issue 08:15:07 Thanks Julien-zte 08:15:11 second the bug of luyao's haven't merged 08:16:42 The upstream daisy CI was broken for several days but now is solved 08:17:07 So zhouya1, if there is any PS to merge please recheck and Let me know 08:17:40 ok,I will recheck till the ci is ok 08:18:40 from the CI side, no virtual deployment successful! 08:18:47 it's ergent for this job 08:19:22 because serena's PS not merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451191/ 08:19:53 for baremetal: os in installing, the progress of each node is 66 66 66 66 66% 08:20:07 this means that time is not enough for deployment? 08:20:23 refer https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/daisy-deploy-daily-master/40/console 08:20:25 no 08:20:58 alexyang, the patch from Serena is merged 08:21:01 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451191/ merged 08:21:06 I have execute 'daisy install 'command mannally on #40 this afternoon 08:21:11 ok, merged just now 08:21:12 I have just merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451191/ 08:21:30 good 08:21:49 Sorry for delay, working on multicast spec all day 08:22:11 so seems the tempest.py file install_os_for_bm_oneshot function haven't work ? 08:22:39 Julien-zte, I can not manage to contact other core to proceed this: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/31965/ 08:23:04 Can I and Eric and merge it ? 08:23:17 https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/31965/ 08:23:34 this patch is only for Committers!, don't +1 in this patch except committers 08:24:23 huzhj, you can send email to ray to express current situation 08:24:36 OK, contributors +1 has been removed 08:24:38 I propose to add 2 committers in this project. 08:24:45 then we can pass 1/2 08:24:46 OK, I will send email to him 08:25:28 when to add the other one? also in this PS? 08:25:31 you can send email to ask them whether they step donw or not? 08:25:52 I have sent email to them, but no one reply... 08:25:56 another patch give the alike things 08:26:03 OK 08:26:41 nominate zhouya as another committer 08:26:43 yes 2 is not enough, we need a tie breaker :) 08:26:52 Agree 08:27:25 I will send another PS to proceed this 08:27:53 and before this, please send email to all the committers and Ray 08:27:58 cc to ray, please 08:28:20 Got it 08:29:08 suggest to keep other committers if they willing to continue work in this project 08:29:33 #action huzhj to amend the upstream CI issue and merge critical PS as quick as possible to solve the virtual deployment failure 08:30:59 Let's move to next topic 08:31:12 #topic Escalator Support 08:31:18 I see guomin is online 08:31:41 Hi guomin , any thing updated for this topic? 08:32:03 guomin is working on impl. some interface between escalator and daisy 08:32:28 such as get version list/ do upgrade 08:32:37 great 08:32:59 daisy need add a new interface for update assigned hosts 08:33:32 you mean update specific host? 08:33:40 yes 08:34:09 It is the most complex part 08:34:18 hope Kolla to support it 08:35:04 hope Kolla DO support sort of partial cluster upgrading , 08:35:28 kind of we can impl a dummy API first 08:36:48 i try it 08:37:13 Great, also please see if Kolla support it yet 08:37:35 ok 08:37:44 anything else for this topic? 08:38:06 no 08:38:12 OK 08:38:15 #topic Cinder/Ceph support 08:38:56 I have tested the cinder support on virtual env and physical env. 08:38:59 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447969 08:39:37 Seems CI lost contact again 08:40:07 is there any issue in the patch? 08:40:07 and we can see cinder-backup cinder-volume cinder-scheduler cinder-api: extra docker container . 08:40:11 thanks zhouya1 08:40:58 according to cinder, I want to know any other components missing in daisy besides cinder? 08:41:40 Julien-zte, can only know it when we know we need it.... 08:42:02 most default component was there 08:42:15 zhouya1, have you tested create a vm with volume? 08:42:22 no 08:42:47 can you test it first before I continue the integration with Functest 08:42:48 I just execute 'openstack volume create --size 1 steak_volume' 08:42:49 I think nova, neutron, keystone, horizon, glance is already there 08:42:58 OK 08:43:18 great 08:43:23 Then I will test this 08:43:26 thanks 08:43:47 shall we begin to deploy on POD2 using upstream jobs 08:44:14 I think zhouya only test baremetal not virtual 08:44:23 zhouya1 do you test virtual env? 08:44:26 yes 08:44:39 I also test virtual env 08:44:57 supported now? 08:45:01 yes 08:45:25 the difference between bm(multinode) and vm(all-in-one) 08:45:27 is 08:45:43 great! 08:45:50 and Serena can continue to test 08:45:53 good news 08:46:15 after zhouya1 test it works with vm I will continue integrating 08:46:35 all in one is (tgtd and iscsid container) multinode is (ceph-osd and ceph-mon container) 08:46:48 If vm is multinode, can it also use Ceph instead of LVM? zhouya1 08:47:29 still not suggest in VM, huzhj 08:47:40 it is useless for the performance of Ceph is not acceptable 08:47:46 I think so, but we should spare an extra disk like /dev/sdb or someting like to use as a ceph bakend for cinder 08:48:12 Virtual Env is only to perform test, not for production 08:48:17 Julien-zte but acording to upstream , using LVM in a multinode cluster is unstable 08:48:27 Oh, Got it 08:49:19 But the question , if vm is multinode and we still use LVM, which node is used for creating the cinder_vg? 08:49:56 in baremetal env, which node is chosen? 08:50:01 if using LVM? 08:50:30 no idea. 08:50:58 now for BM, is Ceph only. 08:51:07 before 08:51:08 yes 08:51:35 I think in baremetal, lvm and ceph, both can be supported, just ceph is the default choose 08:52:18 Julien-zte , please see this bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/1571211 08:52:18 Launchpad bug 1571211 in Cinder "In multinode setup VM fails to launch due to cinder not checking with all glance api servers" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to John Griffith (john-griffith) 08:52:18 ok, let's speed up 08:52:45 that's future requirement, let's support bm+ceph, and allinone+lvm 08:52:49 The Cinder community has closed a bug as WontFix which makes it impossible for LVM to be used at all in a multi-controller setup. The only option for multi-controller storage to work correctly at present is via a Ceph deployment. 08:52:49 OK next topic 08:53:05 #topic Daisy as Kolla Image Version Manager 08:53:18 #info this is almost done from luyao 08:53:32 but we encountered this BUG https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/22260 08:53:54 which will result in upgrading failed 08:54:13 in a intermittent basis 08:54:21 I think maybe the docker verison is too old 08:54:41 in 1.12 there is a issue which block the operation of docker service 08:54:48 or before 1.12 08:54:49 actually the newer the worse 08:55:13 do you have a env to troubleshooting? 08:55:23 luyao has one 08:55:33 I let a member from docker to support you 08:56:00 Great, seems we can not reach luyao currently, I will contact her offline 08:56:08 send a email to me and I will allocate a task 08:56:33 OK, thanks:) 08:57:03 next topic 08:57:12 #topic Multicast Image Distribution 08:57:20 how many tasks left? 08:57:33 time is limited 08:57:34 only one topic left 08:57:35 https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/32709/ 08:57:47 I have finished the spec 08:58:06 and let discuss on gerrit 08:58:30 yes, running out of time 08:58:32 great 08:58:40 add one new topic 08:59:00 a new installer project Armada submitted by AT&T 08:59:01 yes please 08:59:07 do you know about this 08:59:26 no, sound like a installer for ARM? :P 08:59:35 functest pre-ptl suggest only support 5 installers in Functest in next release 08:59:45 not at all, just a name, not arm:) 09:00:03 approved? 09:00:04 Armada a new installer 09:00:09 let's speed up 09:00:21 discussed in TC, and will submit to TSC 09:00:23 approved by tech-group 09:00:28 is proposed to tsc now 09:00:46 time is ergent for us. 09:01:02 Armada is a project open sourced by AT&T, in git 09:01:05 in github 09:01:32 ok for this, and I will send a email for this 09:01:34 and Compass just reply with a positive 09:02:11 Testperf are discussing impl Darwinian election to installers 09:02:11 SerenaFeng what' progress of you unitest task 09:02:26 diversity is good:) 09:02:26 jjb is submitted 09:02:49 huzhi no, because resources is limited 09:03:08 they are talking about limit the number of installers 09:03:39 discuss offline for the new installer 09:03:50 ok 09:03:57 I think they should limit the scennario of a install instead 09:03:58 any other reports ? 09:04:05 no 09:04:11 let's wrap up 09:04:19 alexyang? 09:04:26 thanks all for the great work! 09:04:32 no 09:04:37 thanks all 09:04:43 bye 09:04:47 good weekend 09:04:51 #endmeeting