16:59:52 #startmeeting Designate 16:59:53 Meeting started Wed Aug 17 16:59:52 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:59:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:59:58 The meeting name has been set to 'designate' 17:00:00 #topic Roll Call 17:00:18 o/ 17:00:44 Kiall: timsim pglass rsyed federico3 ping 17:00:53 o/ 17:00:55 o/ 17:01:06 that ping person never shows up 17:01:41 nice 17:01:53 #topic Action Items from last week 17:02:01 there was none \o/ 17:02:08 o/ 17:02:15 #topic Bug Triage (timsim - recurring) 17:02:28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1612288 17:02:28 Launchpad bug 1612288 in Designate "For Horizon: designate_policy.json needs to be simpler to work" [Undecided,New] 17:02:58 tag as docs, medium, ? 17:03:05 but - isn't it simple already? 17:03:19 the rules we have do not work in the horizon policy module 17:03:37 (they do not send the tenant ID in) 17:03:51 mugsie: they don't keep their own set of rules? 17:03:51 so you have to change the rules 17:03:55 o/ 17:04:04 elarson: for horizon? 17:04:11 yeah 17:04:13 mugsie: shouldn't they send tenantId? 17:04:34 the idea is that you would have the same policy file in both horizon and designate for the DNS actions 17:04:42 Kiall: maybe 17:04:46 but right now they dont 17:04:55 I guess we should document it anyway. 17:05:01 yeah 17:05:07 Alright, med +docs tag 17:05:11 Yea, can't argue with that 17:05:17 That's it, (There was also this one, which I think mugsie was going to close out https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1609576) 17:05:17 Launchpad bug 1609576 in Designate "v1 API always gives null for record descriptions, despite v2 recordset having a description?" [Undecided,New] 17:05:20 it if doesn't hurt for our standard to be like horizon's then I'd say do that, but whatever ;) 17:05:56 timsim: damn. will do it now 17:06:09 I have a feeling it would break things for us elarson - as in allow everyone access to everything 17:06:14 #action mugsie close http://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1609576 17:06:42 elarson: yeah, we have some rules that pass in the parent zone, and compare owners 17:07:13 #topic ... ;) 17:07:29 mugsie: ah ok, that makes sense 17:07:36 thanks for explaining! 17:07:39 was seeign if elarson had any more questions Kiall .... 17:07:43 sheesh 17:07:47 #topic Stable Backport Triage (kiall - recurring) 17:07:49 * Kiall missed that ;) 17:07:50 :) 17:07:54 #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/559072/ 17:07:54 As usual. take a few mins and nominate anything in need of backporting.... 17:08:04 has anything merged? 17:08:26 028c9bf Fix SSHFP validation for ECDSA, ED25519, and SHA256 <-- feels like we SHOULD backport that, but policy around that kinda thing is probably weird 17:08:31 nothing from me 17:08:34 and no - there's a CRAPLOAD in the gate 17:08:39 yeah, was debating that 17:08:58 it could be argues that it is a feature 17:09:10 Yea... I think supporting those kinda things in stable branches is OK, and is us fixing compat with DNS vs adding a new Designate feature 17:09:23 But current policy is a "Nope, don't do that".. 17:09:45 timsim: elarson thoughts ^? 17:10:17 Feels like it should be BP'd to me if it's fixing something 17:10:38 It's fixing something, or adding something, depending on which way you approach it ;) 17:10:40 that is my thought as well, but I can also see that it is a feature 17:10:45 But if it's not allowed (eyeroll) then I don't care. 17:10:55 +1 on not caring ;) 17:10:59 wanna call it a fix? 17:11:04 +1 17:11:12 ok, bp it then 17:11:18 who wants to do it? 17:11:34 #action mugsie to BP 028c9bf Fix SSHFP validation for ECDSA, ED25519, and SHA256 17:11:37 voulentold 17:11:40 deal with it ;) 17:11:41 #undo 17:11:41 Removing item from minutes: 17:11:50 -_- 17:11:54 boom 17:12:14 omg i'll do it lol 17:12:18 #action kiall to BP 028c9bf Fix SSHFP validation for ECDSA, ED25519, and SHA256 17:12:24 heh 17:12:25 nvm :x 17:12:49 #topic Mid Cycle Agenda 17:13:15 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/designate-mid-cycle-newton 17:13:44 so, can people put ideas there ^ ? 17:13:54 Yeah 17:14:26 and we will review it on friday 17:14:36 we can add more as the week goes on if needed 17:14:59 mugsie: yeah, IMO it would be good to try to hack on things 17:15:04 yeah 17:15:05 so keeping the agenda small makes sense 17:15:06 I agree 17:15:08 +1 :) 17:15:39 elarson / timsim: when do you two arrive/ 17:15:40 ?* 17:15:47 * elarson checks 17:16:00 Me: Sunday morning ~10:30 17:16:14 timsim: you are going to be soooo sleepy :) 17:16:14 monday at 7:50am... 17:16:18 elarson: ouch 17:16:24 Yeah not as bad as elarson 17:16:29 Different flights? Wanted to guarantee you werent stuck beside each other? 17:16:35 yeah, I had a show saturday evening and had to fly sunday 17:16:40 He has to be a rockstar on saturday. 17:16:51 lol 17:16:51 so where is the jet? 17:16:53 We're on the same ones going back I think 17:17:03 all rockstars have jets right? 17:17:05 * elarson expects some good coffee recommendations when he arrives 17:17:11 heh 17:17:12 yeah you need one of these http://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2016/03/13/12/Iron-Maiden-plane3.jpg 17:17:22 mugsie: yes, but mine is in the shop... 17:17:30 :) 17:17:39 when do you leave? 17:17:57 Saturday 12:25 17:18:02 me too 17:18:18 k, so I will find a thing to do on friday :) 17:18:19 Late enough not to ruin friday :P 17:18:47 #topic Open Discussion 17:18:53 anyt off agenda items? 17:19:26 going once 17:19:32 twice 17:19:40 going .... 17:19:48 cyas :) 17:19:49 #endmeeting