14:01:03 <spotz[m]> #startmeeting diversity-wg 14:01:03 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue May 14 14:01:03 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is spotz[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:03 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:03 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'diversity_wg' 14:01:27 <spotz[m]> #chair fungi 14:01:27 <opendevmeet> Current chairs: fungi spotz[m] 14:01:34 <spotz[m]> #topic Roll Call 14:02:01 <spotz[m]> o/ 14:02:11 <spotz[m]> See if anyone is hanging in the channel and wants to join 14:02:14 <fungi> ahoy! 14:05:01 <spotz[m]> We don't have anything in the actual agenda but we're pretty ad-hoc:) 14:05:05 <spotz[m]> #topic Survey 14:05:12 <spotz[m]> Any updates? 14:06:04 <fungi> so, we did start drafting communication points in an etherpad... 14:06:10 * fungi finds 14:06:40 <fungi> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/surveyemail 14:08:37 <fungi> i think where we ended up a couple of meetings back was that once we're satisfied that covers our recommendations for what to communicate, you had said you'd send something to the foundation ml while i'd work with the other community managers on similar targeted outreach to their primary communication channels 14:09:19 <spotz[m]> Just added that link to the agenda so we don't have to search next time:) 14:09:23 <fungi> i don't remember if we'd decided that everything we want to cover is in that pad now, or whether there's anything missing 14:10:03 <spotz[m]> Ok so I'll put together an email this week, no I think it covers the basics except for where the actual survey is:) 14:10:31 <spotz[m]> Pulling up our page now 14:10:45 <spotz[m]> #link https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/openinfra_diversity_inclusion 14:12:06 <spotz[m]> I'd like to get that kickstarted, it'd be have some results to maybe combine with information from the OpenInfra Days if any was taken 14:12:20 <fungi> i thought we had intentionally not deep-linked to the survey url in order to drive people to the diversity page so they'd also see how to get involved 14:12:51 <fungi> since we primarily made that page in order to have a better perma-link/landing page for promoting the survey anyway 14:14:27 <spotz[m]> I think we should do both at this point, no one is going to either 14:15:21 <fungi> well, we haven't publicized that page yet, which was supposed to be the next step after we got it added 14:15:57 <fungi> i agree nobody is likely to stumble across that at random either 14:16:17 <spotz[m]> So do we want to publicize first then in a month push the survey? 14:17:30 <fungi> well, since the primary think we put that page together for was to act as a place to link the survey (so that our promoting isn't pointing at some long/random formstack url), i thought we could do both at the same time 14:18:01 <spotz[m]> Ok so I was typing something like the following but then deleted it... 14:18:41 <fungi> that was why for point #1 in the pad i said the page includes a link to the survey (so that people know where to find it) 14:18:58 <spotz[m]> On the Diversity and inclusion WG page(link) you'll find information on how to get involved including information about the diversity survey(link) 14:19:33 <spotz[m]> Ok I'll work on something later today hopefully and put it on that etherpad and then ping 14:20:47 <spotz[m]> Anything else on this? 14:21:01 <fungi> i'm not wholly opposed to communicating links to both, but figured if people who want to take the survey are following the one and only link in the e-mail then they also have all the information about the mailing list and monthly meetings right there too, along with context as to what we're about, rather than following a direct link to the survey and missing the rest 14:22:01 <spotz[m]> True, let's see how it comes out when in email form. I know some of the events pages it's hard to find the links to things due to type and colors 14:22:06 <fungi> sending them to that page avoids needing to redundantly communicate details/links and additional context in the e-mail, freeing us up to keep it short and to the point 14:23:43 <fungi> and yeah, that was all i had for the survey topic 14:24:22 <fungi> we've got a community managers meeting in a few hours, so i'll update the rest of them on this 14:24:39 <spotz[m]> Sounds good. 14:24:53 <spotz[m]> #topic events 14:25:34 <spotz[m]> Any word back on the events? I know from looking at a few of the schedules diversity wasn't a major factor in picking the speakers 14:26:08 <spotz[m]> So that might be something we need to work on if we do the community events again 14:27:00 <fungi> yeah, also the foundation staff is in less of a position to control that for this year's events 14:27:17 <fungi> at least for the european roadshow events 14:27:58 <fungi> i think we still have some time to try to impress the importance of it on the korea organizers since that cfp doesn't close for a couple more weeks 14:28:03 <spotz[m]> Maybe a guideline, things to consider when selecting your talks and speakers 14:28:57 <spotz[m]> It's not just gender diversity, but company, nationality possibly as well language permitting 14:29:09 <fungi> but probably one of the other things we can try to do is encourage a greater diversity in speakers proposing talks. if the track chairs end up with very little diversity to pick from, then they're kinda stuck 14:29:52 <fungi> which i get the impression may have been part of the problem for the events this month 14:31:05 <fungi> the staff have at least made sure to impress on the event organizers the importance of publicizing and following the code of conduct 14:32:28 <spotz[m]> Yeah that could go back to the links being hard to find issue. I know Helena has sent emails to the foundation and community lists but that might not have gotten a broad enough audience from the OpenStack side, Ildiko emails the StarlingX list but they have 1, etc 14:32:30 <fungi> yeah, for "diversity" i've always felt we're trying to improve it along a variety of vectors: personal diversity, professional diversity, cultural diversity, geographic diversity 14:33:28 <spotz[m]> Maybe we can start a proposal help group, that would help with folks early in their speaking careers 14:34:27 <fungi> i've seen that tried in other communities, presumably it works well but i don't know that for certain. definitely worth a shot 14:35:08 <spotz[m]> That plus a track chair guidelines to help folks who maybe haven't organized a large event before 14:35:41 <spotz[m]> It works for devconf CZ for sure, I usually mentor looking at proposals and then helping folks with run throughs 14:37:54 <spotz[m]> We can offer that's all we can do 14:37:59 <fungi> back in the early days of the openstack infra team, we collaborated on putting together/sharing slide decks and associated abstracts that newer folks could propose to a conference and present without having to do a ton of work, though that was more for submitting to conferences that hadn't seen that same material previously 14:38:49 <spotz[m]> Yeah I've been wanting to have a few prepared talks for CentOS for a while 14:41:15 <fungi> also i'm told we have more travel support budget this year than we've had previously, so we can try to encourage speakers to take advantage of that 14:42:16 <fungi> if it comes down to deciding who will and won't get their travel comped, diversity aspects and whether they're speaking will play a key role in that 14:42:52 <spotz[m]> Yeah and Helena and I already talked about the overlapping cutoff dates 14:43:28 <spotz[m]> I also think there will be less talks because of the 2 days so that also adds in a way to the budget 14:43:41 <fungi> the regional nature of these events likely means we'll see lower levels of geographic, cultural and, to some extent, professional diversity for attendees, but we'll also be needing to try extra hard to pull speakers from farther afield 14:45:09 <spotz[m]> People are applying at least for Asia. Sweden and CERN have speakers from other continents but I think the Ironic meetup helped on that 14:45:33 <fungi> would be good to think about what we could do to encourage more people to submit talks 14:46:17 <fungi> at least if there are lots of talks to choose from, it gives the track chairs some options for choosing more diverse speakers out of the available pool of possibilities 14:47:29 <spotz[m]> Yeah I wasn't going to originally then I put 2 in to support the event 14:48:13 <fungi> much appreciated! 14:48:59 <spotz[m]> I kinda picked the topics based on the Okestra presentation so they'll either be much appreciated or not:) 14:49:37 <fungi> heh 14:50:18 <spotz[m]> It's all good 14:50:50 <fungi> i'm sure they'll be excited that people in other parts of the world are interested in the same things 14:51:46 <spotz[m]> I think we just keep promoting the CFP and travel support and that will help 14:52:28 <fungi> yeah, my to do list for this week is to do some broader communication about that across the openstack community 14:53:03 <spotz[m]> Sweet. Anything else you want to talk on, or you want a break before your next meeting? 14:53:24 <fungi> i don't really need a break, but didn't have anything else to cover either 14:54:56 <spotz[m]> Ok let's call it here then:) 14:55:02 <spotz[m]> #endmeeting