03:01:25 #startmeeting docteam 03:01:26 Meeting started Wed Jul 30 03:01:25 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is loquacities. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 03:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 03:01:30 The meeting name has been set to 'docteam' 03:01:30 Good to hear, hope it's a fast recovery 03:01:40 #topic Action items from the last meeting 03:01:51 thanks, hopefully soon 03:02:07 regXboi to add list of existing neutron doc bugs to the blueprint 03:02:07 wiki page 03:02:15 Sam-I-Am: that's you, right? 03:02:31 uh 03:02:44 regXboi is not me, but i think that was done. 03:02:58 it's not? 03:03:00 what is regxboi?? 03:03:18 a new docs person 03:03:21 interested in neutron 03:03:25 they dont come around often 03:03:28 lol 03:03:31 Is their name... Matt 03:03:32 we better look after him :P 03:03:35 Last name... Kassawarra 03:03:40 Kassawara* 03:03:40 slong_: wow, long time no see 03:03:44 :D 03:03:51 Trying to get back into the fold, Sam-I-Am 03:04:00 Did you see I submitted a patch? 03:04:14 #topic Architecture and Design Guide progress 03:04:35 #info It's Alive! The Architecture Design Guide has been merged 03:04:42 Yes, yes it has. 03:04:42 !! 03:04:42 slong_: Error: "!" is not a valid command. 03:04:44 ^^ from the US meeting last week :) 03:04:49 And it's looking pretty a'okay! 03:05:03 #link http://docs.openstack.org/arch-design/content/ 03:05:06 slong_: its been... months? 03:05:28 2 months... 03:05:29 * fifieldt_ wanders in 03:05:36 hallo 03:05:40 fifieldt_, IT'S YOU. You're the one that has regxboi 03:05:43 Found him loquacities 03:05:43 so it's worth saying congrats to asettle, since she's here :) 03:05:48 Oh spanks 03:06:09 #topic Review docs-specs: shared glossary and HOT template chapter in user guide 03:06:31 is that the HEAT templates guide? 03:06:34 i think that one still waiting for the patch to get approved.. 03:06:35 yes 03:06:38 ack 03:07:02 ok 03:07:05 that will be the starting point and then we start including more stuff 03:07:40 dnavale, who are you working with? 03:07:45 'we' 03:07:57 gauvain 03:08:03 and annegentle 03:08:20 ^ gpocentek 03:08:49 ohai 03:08:56 yup.. thats the one.. and this is the starting point https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108133/ 03:09:04 sorry still getting kids to bed but will pop in when I can 03:09:30 nice crowd in here 03:09:39 heya an 03:09:43 annegentle* 03:09:57 #topic Summit proposals due 7/28/14 03:10:01 which is of course done 03:10:31 did anyone submit anything? 03:10:37 i did! 03:10:42 * fifieldt_ hi5 03:10:45 fifieldt_, the team that wrote the OpenStack Design Guide did :) 03:10:52 so, hopefully we'll get it! 03:10:58 We proposed a panel 03:11:15 ah, that was a fun panel when we did the ops guide :) 03:11:17 I hope you get it 03:11:26 me too :) 03:11:26 alexandra, nice. good luck 03:11:30 *nods* we heard it was a success for you guys, so we're riding on your coat tails 03:11:38 Thanks dnavale :0 03:11:40 :) * 03:11:44 #topic Doc tools updates 03:12:26 from last meeting: 14:40:10 I don't have a lot to report on doc tools, just keep an eye on the mailing list about the training guide xi:includes 03:12:48 I am playing with the epub build 03:12:50 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107825/ 03:13:01 I got it to work, kinda 03:13:05 with image support, even 03:13:14 it still looks kinda bad, but with that patch, might be usable 03:13:32 lol @ last comment on that patch 03:13:45 who reads epubs? 03:13:46 martin paulo is a legend 03:14:01 Hahahahaahaha 03:14:03 slong_, we get requests :D 03:14:19 :D 03:14:22 From/ 03:14:23 ? * 03:14:31 personally, I hate reading on the screen :) 03:14:38 from random people on the internet 03:14:39 So, you and that one guy? 03:14:43 LOL 03:14:47 lol 03:15:22 the complaints were around the epub generated by {book sprint, oreilly} not matching the html/pdf 03:15:34 the people did actually want epubs :) 03:15:38 ah, makes sense 03:15:40 hm, any idea what % read epub? 03:15:45 no idea! 03:15:54 acrtually 03:15:56 we should be able to get that from website stats, surely? 03:15:58 I do have an idea 03:16:01 oreilly sales data is clear 03:16:03 Dun dun dunnnnnnnnn 03:16:05 ah 03:16:09 many more epubs than actual books 03:16:19 for ops guide 03:16:31 hem, that's not horribly surprising 03:17:30 #topic docs swarm 03:17:42 so, the brisbane docs swarm is on 9 august 03:17:59 #link http://openstack-swarm.rhcloud.com/ 03:18:00 anybody in BNE coming? 03:18:12 *waves* yes 03:18:30 *raises hand* 03:18:37 does everyone know about the wiki with the toc? 03:18:41 /me is going too 03:18:44 oops 03:18:47 derp 03:18:52 * Sam-I-Am is too far away 03:19:00 it's on the links page on that site 03:19:04 also: there'll be swag 03:19:05 and pizza 03:19:16 Oh god, no more pizza 03:19:20 I ate too much 03:19:23 alexandra: mtn dew 03:19:30 breakfast tacos? 03:19:33 there is also an impromptu US meetup later in august 03:20:31 loquacities, for OpenStack upstream docs? or OpenStack upstream devs+docs? 03:21:03 docs 03:21:30 27 august, at the castle, i believe 03:22:04 hmmm 03:22:08 any info on that? 03:22:22 i think annegentle will be able to help you there 03:22:42 ok, i think that covers the formal topics 03:22:48 #topic Open Discussion 03:22:48 It'd be great if it was on the mailing list :) 03:22:55 Informal topic: breakfast tacos 03:23:05 A topic for open discussion is the review guidlines 03:23:06 how awesome are breakfast tacos? 03:23:09 alexandra: Your fave! 03:23:09 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/ReviewGuidelines 03:23:11 containerized breakfast tacos 03:23:16 Go fuck yourself 03:23:18 Why would you do this 03:23:31 no,no, breakfast burritos.... 03:23:31 hahahaha 03:23:32 :P 03:23:33 mmmyes JRobinson__ 03:23:55 So the docs review guidelines have progressed over the past week. 03:24:05 review guidelines = important 03:24:07 they keep us sane 03:24:12 loquacities: not so impromptu, right fifieldt_ -- hooked in with the ops meetup as far as I know 03:24:34 Indeed, there are some important points there. 03:24:53 oh unless fifieldt_ hasn't heard about it yet, which is totally probable. 03:25:14 thanks annegentle, unfortunately I haven't. I've got a competing meeting in San Francisco on the 27th, so any details would be great to see if I can shift things around:) 03:25:21 Edgar, Matt, (Sam-I-Am) and Phil (phil_h) and me so far 03:25:40 #info Review Guidelines are updated with new content - important reading for docs reviews 03:25:52 thinking all day, or ... ? 03:25:55 thanks JRobinson__ :) 03:26:10 fifieldt_: phil's working on a room/area, and I'm looking for Edgar's etherpad now 03:26:54 ok, please do let me know' 03:26:58 or rather, let the ML know 03:26:59 :) 03:27:38 also... install guide updates making slow progress 03:27:49 waiting for juno packages to drop 03:28:02 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-docs-juno 03:28:24 Sam-I-Am: can you send a note to the ML about the neutron docs happenin' Aug 27? 03:28:31 Sam-I-Am: or I can ask Phil too 03:28:38 halfway debating replacing ovs with linuxbridge and making nova-net more similar to neutron's arch IF it isnt deprecated. 03:28:55 Sam-I-Am: read today's TC meeting log; I think OVS is preferred 03:29:02 annegentle: i would if i knew the specifics. 03:29:07 thats surprising. 03:29:22 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-07-29-20.02.log.html 03:29:54 well, there's two needs: 1) a documented all-open-source solution and 2) multihost 03:30:14 all-open-source = not-packages? 03:30:15 It's unclear to me still whether both needs are dependent on either other in anyway 03:30:22 driver open source I believe 03:30:29 Sam-I-Am, it's not that surprising 03:30:32 packages are fine 03:31:25 sgordon__: whys that? 03:31:30 ovs is a pos 03:31:38 Sam-I-Am, sure 03:31:46 difficult to understand and troubleshoot 03:31:51 I want a tshirt that says "elucidating niggles since 2010" 03:31:52 Sam-I-Am, but if you were happy with LB you would just be using nova-network 03:31:57 annegentle: me too! 03:32:16 sgordon__: neutron+lb ? 03:32:22 sgordon__, yes 03:32:29 get the neutrony things without ovs 03:32:39 sure, but what does that really get you 03:33:06 sanity? 03:33:06 that to me is using neutron for the sake of neutron 03:33:18 sgordon__: unless you're out of ipv4 addresses? 03:33:23 what does ovs get you? 03:33:30 * annegentle not arguing; making sure I understand 03:33:43 oh no, the ipv6 card :P 03:33:55 Sam-I-Am: non-vendor lockin on hardware? 03:34:05 I think? 03:34:10 annegentle, that is not really the argument 03:34:20 annegentle, LB is using the linux bridging that is in the kernel 03:34:24 nothing closed source about it 03:34:27 sgordon__: ok. I hadn't heard the multihost solution til today 03:34:41 but most development effort appears to be around OVS 03:34:43 sgordon__: oh I read load balancing 03:34:53 because it provides capabilities over and above basic linux bridge 03:35:00 annegentle: when you say documented all-open-source solution, is that like a reference architecture one step better than the one presented in the install guide? 03:35:14 which is why i say if you were happy with LB why would you be using neutron in the first place from a functionality perspective 03:35:27 but again, just my opinion 03:35:36 it's certainly true that OVS is more involved 03:36:06 i would argue part of that is that it forces people into a new way of thinking about their networking versus being able to use the traditional tools as easily 03:36:11 in many cases, ovs is doing the same thing as lb... bridging things. 03:36:33 like what we cover in the install guide, lb would be fine. 03:36:37 Sam-I-Am: really I mean "working/tested" since that's the only way we can document 03:37:11 annegentle: we can do things like that. just need time and a place to run/test them. 03:37:17 and linux bridging is what nova-network does anyway? 03:37:18 Sam-I-Am, what we cover in the install guide nova-network would be fine too 03:37:20 i also wonder if an all-in-one would be useful 03:37:22 not really the point 03:38:27 Sam-I-Am: I'm still meh on the docs taking on all-in-one; plenty of places for people to find that already 03:38:46 apparently including training, heh 03:38:48 annegentle: true. just wondering since i see people asking for it. 03:38:58 i thought training was using our stuff? 03:39:03 annegentle, tend to agree 03:39:16 Sam-I-Am: not based on this week's meeting 03:39:26 wat? 03:39:33 Sam-I-Am: or rather, using or stuff, plus making an allinone for trainers... 03:39:43 they were always supposed to be but even when it was in tree there seemed to be a lot of other content... 03:39:53 all-in-ones are difficult to visualize and troubleshoot 03:39:53 Sam-I-Am: ask dbite/ dguitarbite for more 03:40:02 unless you want to use linux containers, then its easier 03:40:05 but also... containers 03:40:07 sgordon__: your eyes did not deceive you 03:40:14 none of that knowledge transfers to multihost well either 03:40:24 since you have no idea which bits to separate or expect collocated 03:40:24 sgordon__: yah 03:40:35 * annegentle is sleepy... 03:40:40 * Sam-I-Am is frustrated 03:40:54 * sgordon__ is a potatoe 03:40:57 we could wrap this up now :) 03:41:01 this shouldnt be complicated :/ 03:41:01 thanks JRobinson__ for the heads up earlier! 03:41:05 and thanks loquacities! 03:41:08 loquacities: yes, before i 'splode 03:41:09 np 03:41:14 thanks for staying late :) 03:41:18 #endmeeting