19:00:27 #startmeeting docteam 19:00:29 Meeting started Wed Apr 13 19:00:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ShillaSaebi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:00:32 The meeting name has been set to 'docteam' 19:00:39 Hello! Anyone here for the US docs meeting? 19:04:19 * njohnston lurks 19:04:22 hi 19:04:30 Hello 19:04:33 hi :) 19:04:38 so is it just us 3 19:04:44 anyone else here for the US docs meeting? 19:04:47 devananda, mjturek1: yes. 19:05:01 (sorry, delayed response, me goes away) 19:05:03 I'm here 19:05:27 ok we can run through the agenda 19:05:38 #topic Action items from the last meeting 19:05:40 none 19:05:55 #topic Specs in review 19:05:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/docs-specs,n,z 19:07:10 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290053/ (Trove) 19:07:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/289994/ (Magnum) 19:10:28 #topic Speciality teams 19:10:30 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Speciality_Team_Reports 19:10:40 feel free to look at the specialty team reports to see what the updates are 19:11:26 any questions so far 19:11:35 Question about the trove and magnum install guide specs, are those working with the project-specific install guides spec ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301284/ ), or are they operating in parallel? 19:14:02 bit late... calendar notification failure 19:14:12 hi Sam-I-Am 19:14:13 great timing 19:14:16 :) 19:14:21 well, ok. 19:14:41 anyone else here? 19:14:44 @njohnston i am not sure i beieve it's working in parallel 19:15:06 yes @njohnston is here and so is @jreeves 19:15:15 and @gmolson 19:15:30 you missed everything Sam-I-Am. 2 minutes too late 19:16:07 nice 19:16:08 ShillaSaebi: Thanks, I was curious. 19:16:26 j/k, of course 19:17:11 ok we were just covering the specialty teams 19:17:41 njohnston, i just discussed (ML) with Andreas about the trove install guides 19:17:49 it went to openstack-docs mailing list 19:18:07 amrith: Thanks, I will check it out. I do get that, but I'm a little behind. 19:18:17 there was a lot of confusion about that 19:18:51 i told laurel some time ago that it was just missing the deadline by a tiny period, and a lot of effort went in, so we could merge it late, or even backport it 19:18:57 but not everyone is on the same page 19:19:07 this was before the spec to do whatever with the install guide 19:19:16 njohnston, please see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2016-April/008434.html, http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2016-April/008435.html, http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2016-April/008436.html 19:19:17 thx 19:19:55 at this point, I believe that Andreas is fine with letting the docs into Mitaka if the docs team is ok with it. 19:19:58 the spec should only apply after it merges 19:20:02 see the last email in the list. 19:20:04 yeah, and i'm fine with that to 19:20:40 thanks; laurel isn't able to join the meeting as she's driving at the moment 19:20:47 i'm sure there will be lively discussion of the install guide at the summit, as there usually is... and no one ever commits to anything. 19:21:16 I commit to attending the session(s) to discuss it. 19:21:26 on that note #topic Summit Planning 19:21:44 I commit to making a commitment to evaluate my commitments. 19:21:55 We have room allocations, please take a look at #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Newton-DocsSessions 19:22:10 If you are going to the summit, please look to see what/when/where the sessions are 19:22:34 feel free to add your ideas to the Etherpad as well 19:22:51 i probably wont be in the install guide stuff 19:22:57 i'm throwing in the towel on it 19:23:21 after 6 development cycles, the politics just overshadow any benefit i was getting out of it 19:24:18 im sorry to hear 19:24:41 yep, but so goes. plenty of other work to do with less politics. 19:24:55 the networking guide needs lots of love 19:25:01 I suspect you're going to have your hands full with Neutron anyway 19:25:17 he's got his hands full all the time 19:25:17 yeah, neutron has been increasingly consuming time 19:25:23 among other stuff 19:25:24 lots of work is ture 19:25:26 true* 19:25:30 im sorry to hear about the politics 19:26:05 * sc68cal drops in 19:26:11 i figure if other people think they can do a better job with the installation guide, then they can commit the resources to do it 19:26:20 sup sc68cal 19:26:46 yo. if there's time in open discussion, can chat about ops guide rst 19:26:57 yeah 19:27:04 any other questions on summit sched and Etherpad 19:27:22 anyway, i'll attempt to finish the mitaka guide 19:27:40 which includes lagging changes and probably some bug reports as people try to use it 19:27:59 but no contributions beyond that 19:28:16 thanks for your help Sam-I-Am 19:28:24 ++ 19:28:39 alright 19:28:43 #topic Open Discussion 19:28:53 you guys are up 19:29:08 * sc68cal waits his turn since he came late 19:29:40 sc68cal: i dont think there's many people here 19:30:18 yeah feel free Sean 19:30:19 Gotcha. Basically a lot of folks cleaned up the RST conversion, so I was looking to see what we need in the future to get it published 19:30:30 sweeeet 19:30:34 I'm going to be doing a lot of work on the subject of upgrading an OpenStack clsuter 19:30:41 so, I plan on contributing a lot of docs around it 19:30:43 sweeet x2 19:30:53 well that's great 19:30:59 so I plan on working on the upgrades section quite a bit of the ops guide 19:31:55 i still think we should just collapse all of these separate guides into one, organized by service :) 19:32:13 is upgrading an admin thing? an operator thing? etc 19:32:25 I think my plan was: Use the upgrades section to then point to more specific service doc 19:32:35 so neutron has a lot of good work done by ihar and others in the devref about upgrades 19:32:39 probaby nova has a lot too 19:32:54 yeah, that content shouldnt be in the devref 19:32:58 its for developers, not operators 19:33:05 right. but that's where it currently is 19:33:11 it should be moved somewhere 19:33:35 that's fine. My point was - there is content that really smart people have contributed, and we can use that as the basis for something more 19:33:42 #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9511 19:33:46 makes sense 19:34:32 There is an ops-guide session in the ops track during the summit 19:34:45 * sc68cal adds to calendar 19:34:47 thanks :) 19:34:52 awesome 19:35:28 This will be a great opportunity to talk about and plan the approach for the arch and ops-guid 19:35:30 guide* 19:35:36 I plan on attending 19:35:46 arch guide is perfect. I helped write it. it's PERFECT 19:35:49 ;) 19:36:31 +1 19:36:40 thank you for that 19:37:02 alright anything else anyone wants to discuss or bring up 19:37:33 hmm, that meeting conflicts with the ops summit upgrades session? 19:39:41 im not sure 19:40:14 if it conflicts for you, write down your questions and concerns and i can take them there, bring them up and take notes 19:40:47 we will hopefully have some more insight after we get together in Austin 19:41:33 anyone have anything else to bring up? 19:42:38 ok if not then meeting adjourned 19:42:42 thank you all for joining 19:42:45 #endmeeting