19:04:09 #startmeeting docteam 19:04:10 Meeting started Wed Aug 3 19:04:09 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sam-I-Am. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:04:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:04:14 The meeting name has been set to 'docteam' 19:04:26 i'm not really the chair, but no one else is, so here we go 19:04:44 #topic action items from last meeting 19:05:03 i dont recall anything in particular 19:05:15 i was actually at the apac meeting last week 19:05:33 hey, sorry I'm late 19:05:48 No problem. 19:05:49 hi anne 19:05:59 wasnt sure who was chairing this 19:06:06 I told Shilla I could chair, but looks like you've got it Sam-I-Am -- thanks 19:06:12 carry on! 19:06:17 ok 19:06:21 #topic specs in review 19:06:32 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/docs-specs,n,z 19:07:01 looks like we only have 3 specs in review, and they've recently received some love 19:07:05 none of them involve me 19:07:12 anyone else care to comment on them? 19:07:36 guess not 19:07:49 #topic specialty team reports 19:07:59 anyone from specialty teams here? 19:08:03 API here 19:08:17 got anything to tell us? 19:08:46 sure, the ceilometer/telemetry API reference migration landed today. HURRAH. 19:08:50 woo 19:08:52 I think trove is the last one left! 19:09:05 so all the other services are done? 19:09:08 We're also getting closer to having the API ref/guides drop-down navigation ready 19:09:36 Yes. Also check out the new listing of API links generated from projects.yaml the governance repo. 19:09:41 just a sec hafta find link 19:10:01 or, well, first things first. 19:10:10 #info trove API ref migration still in progress 19:10:12 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316381/ 19:10:32 #info telemetry/ceilometer API ref migration complete, thanks team! 19:10:39 cool 19:10:46 looks like the api stuff is catching on 19:10:48 #info getting closer to having the API ref/guides drop-down navigation ready 19:10:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/329508/ 19:11:16 I think we know the order of landing those patches so the web dev stuff holds together. 19:11:28 Ok, other news on API "completeness" 19:12:19 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316396/ 19:12:25 that landed yesterday ^^ 19:12:33 So now we can do things like what this patch does 19:12:45 oh yeah, i remember that one 19:12:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349669/ 19:13:28 So, now we can follow up with the teams who a) don't have API docs or b) have them but won't be in the nav menu 19:13:33 yay 19:13:37 * Sam-I-Am likes progress 19:13:48 I think that's the report for this week 19:14:01 ok, guess we'll hit the networking guide since i'm here 19:14:21 not a lot going on, but a continuous stream of content patches from networking devs 19:14:30 i still need to backport the reorg patch 19:14:42 nice 19:14:49 then work on updating the scenarios... and of course the endless pile of content that needs love 19:15:13 any other specialty team reps here? 19:15:36 #topic liaisons 19:15:45 anything from doc liaisons here? 19:16:00 I don't have anything from the keystone side of the house 19:16:26 oh, I did have an incoming request 19:16:28 remember that around m3 into rc1, the install guide begins to need updates for the next release 19:16:36 from rosmaita that's a good idea 19:16:41 same with the networking guide, or anything else that has config-specific content 19:17:04 Basically now that we can make nicer status code tables, we should write an example file that contains the status descriptions we'd like to see. 19:17:19 thats a good idea 19:17:27 I can take a stab at it, but wanted to ask lbragstad or others, where would you like the example status codes tables to live? 19:17:41 it's an easy way to do a copy/paste to pre-fill, then add more details per-service later 19:17:50 annegentle_ hmmm 19:17:53 lbragstad: do you know about the status table addition? It only went in last week 19:18:01 annegentle_ not yet 19:18:05 annegentle_ link? 19:18:15 lbragstad: yep, getting one 19:18:30 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349551/ 19:18:38 that's the glance proof-of-concept 19:18:43 and they look nice 19:19:05 needs an update in the global requirements 19:19:27 annegentle_ ah interesting! 19:19:39 we're encouraging other projects to follow this lead? 19:19:46 #info now that we can make nicer status code tables, we should write an example file that contains the status descriptions 19:20:29 lbragstad: yeah I was hoping we'd get all the teams that have their content in rst+yaml to add these status code tables also, but want to find a good way to give them content 19:20:31 standards are good ideas 19:20:40 lbragstad: how could we bootstrap it? Ya know? 19:21:05 lbragstad: and, with the new sidebar nav coming in, teams will need to update the conf.py anyway 19:21:21 annegentle_ gotcha 19:21:38 anyway, the point of this meeting is to let people know about it, but also find ways we can give you more stuff to standardize with 19:21:46 annegentle_ what would the status code description example be like? 19:21:55 we're at the point where the status codes are consumable but from where 19:22:01 the release note standardization-ish spec will be nice when its merged/implemented :) 19:22:14 lbragstad: so it goes into a second yaml file: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349551/1/api-ref/source/v2/http-codes.yaml 19:22:30 lbragstad: and what we could do is give the default: text 19:22:39 and let teams fill in informal: text and also change default: 19:22:52 but these are standard codes so I'd like to pre-fill somewhat. 19:23:01 Maybe I just send a note to openstack-dev? with a starter yaml file? 19:23:14 annegentle_ yeah - that would make sense 19:23:38 annegentle_ personally - i'd be fine with a super simple template to fill out 19:23:39 yep 19:23:52 lbragstad: yeah 19:24:00 because chances are I'm going to be working through it with various members of my team anyway 19:24:12 lbragstad: I don't want to sign up for the patching, but can give out a starter file. 19:24:21 so, ML post ok? 19:24:26 annegentle_ sure 19:24:33 Yes. 19:24:41 check. 19:24:47 Sam-I-Am: feel free to send it as an action 19:25:30 #action annegentle will post to the dev mailing list regarding status code standardization 19:25:53 anything else? 19:26:21 not from here 19:26:24 #topic newton deliverables 19:26:34 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/NewtonDeliverables 19:26:44 tracking what we're trying to complete for newton 19:27:12 lastly... 19:27:15 #topic open discussion 19:27:26 anyone have any other input for the meeting? 19:27:52 I'll add a line about the file renaming. 19:27:58 ok 19:28:00 to the NewtonDeliverables. 19:28:08 first patch in review for common, woo 19:28:15 #action annegentle to add file renaming to newton deliverables 19:28:47 nothing else, we can close it at 30 minutes 19:28:55 go back and typey typey 19:29:04 #endmeeting